Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Dec;17(6):643-63.
doi: 10.1177/0962280207087309. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach

Jonathan D Mahnken  1 , Wenyaw Chan, Daniel H Freeman Jr, Jean L Freeman
Affiliations
Review

Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach

Jonathan D Mahnken et al. Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Measuring the benefit of screening mammography is difficult due to lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection. We evaluated the benefit of screening mammography in reducing breast cancer mortality using observational data from the SEER-Medicare linked database. The conceptual model divided the disease duration into two phases: preclinical (T(0)) and symptomatic (T(1)) breast cancer. Censored information for the bivariate response vector ( T(0), T(1)) was observed and used to generate a likelihood function. However, the contribution to the likelihood function for some observations could not be calculated analytically, thus, censoring boundaries for these observations were modified. Inferences about the impact of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality were made based on maximum likelihood estimates derived from this likelihood function. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.54 (0.48-0.61) and 0.33 (0.26- 0.42) for single and regular users (vs. non-users), respectively, demonstrated a protective effect of screening mammography among women 69 years and older. This method reduced the impact of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection, which biased the estimated hazard ratios derived from standard survival models in favour of screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources