Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Summer;3(3):109-17.

Clinical scales for comatose patients: the Glasgow Coma Scale in historical context and the new FOUR Score

Eelco F M Wijdicks  1
Affiliations
  • PMID: 17047576
Review

Clinical scales for comatose patients: the Glasgow Coma Scale in historical context and the new FOUR Score

Eelco F M Wijdicks. Rev Neurol Dis. 2006 Summer.

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has been the gold standard for assessing the level of consciousness in patients with significant brain injury. Prior efforts to modify or replace this scale have been unsuccessful because no scale could improve on its simplicity and practical usefulness. This review provides a historical perspective on coma scales and introduces a new and simple, but more comprehensive, scale: the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score, which has been recently validated. The FOUR Score has 4 components with "4" as a maximal score for each item. The individual components are eye responses (eye opening and eye tracking), motor responses (responses to pain and following simple hand commands), brainstem reflexes (pupil, cornea, and cough reflexes), and respiration (breathing rhythm and respiratory drive in ventilated patients). The FOUR Score is a further improvement on previous scales for classifying and communicating impaired consciousness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources