Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Dec;8(6):R409-13.
doi: 10.1186/cc2959. Epub 2004 Oct 14.

An international sepsis survey: a study of doctors' knowledge and perception about sepsis

Affiliations

An international sepsis survey: a study of doctors' knowledge and perception about sepsis

Martijn Poeze et al. Crit Care. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

Background: To be able to diagnose and treat sepsis better it is important not only to improve the knowledge about definitions and pathophysiology, but also to gain more insight into specialists' perception of, and attitude towards, the current diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.

Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective, international survey by structured telephone interview. The subjects were intensive care physicians and other specialist physicians caring for intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Results: The 1058 physicians who were interviewed (including 529 intensivists) agreed that sepsis is a leading cause of death on the ICU and that the incidence of sepsis is increasing, but that the symptoms of sepsis can easily be misattributed to other conditions. Physicians were concerned that this could lead to under-reporting of sepsis. Two-thirds (67%) were concerned that a common definition is lacking and 83% said it is likely that sepsis is frequently missed. Not more than 17% agreed on any one definition.

Conclusion: There is a general awareness about the inadequacy of the current definitions of sepsis. Physicians caring for patients with sepsis recognise the difficulty of defining and diagnosing sepsis and are aware that they miss the diagnosis frequently.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The challenge of sepsis.
    Levy MM. Levy MM. Crit Care. 2004 Dec;8(6):435-6. doi: 10.1186/cc3009. Epub 2004 Nov 15. Crit Care. 2004. PMID: 15566612 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kieft H, Hoepelman AIM, Zhou W, Rozenberg-Arska M, Struyvenberg A, Verhoef J. The sepsis syndrome in a Dutch University Hospital. Clinical observations. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2241–2247. doi: 10.1001/archinte.153.19.2241. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nathens AB, Marshall JC. Sepsis, SIRS, and MODS: what's in a name? World J Surg. 1996;20:386–391. doi: 10.1007/s002689900061. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL. Dear SIRS, I'm sorry to say that I don't like you.. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:372–374. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199702000-00029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RA, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest. 1992;101:1644–1655. - PubMed
    1. Carson SS, Stocking C, Podsadecki T, Christenson J, Pohlman A, MacRae S, Jordan J, Humphrey H, Siegler M, Hall J. Effects of organizational change in the medical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital: a comparison of 'open' and 'closed' formats. JAMA. 1996;276:322–328. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.4.322. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms