Evolution of human mate choice
- PMID: 15216422
- DOI: 10.1080/00224490409552211
Evolution of human mate choice
Abstract
This article provides a review of evolutionary theory and empirical research on mate choices in nonhuman species and uses it as a frame for understanding the how and why of human mate choices. The basic principle is that the preferred mate choices and attendant social cognitions and behaviors of both women and men, and those of other species, have evolved to focus on and exploit the reproductive potential and reproductive investment of members of the opposite sex. Reproductive potential is defined as the genetic, material, and/or social resources an individual can invest in offspring, and reproductive investment is the actual use of these resources to enhance the physical and social well- being of offspring. Similarities and differences in the mate preferences and choices of women and men are reviewed and can be understood in terms of similarities and differences in the form of reproductive potential that women and men have to offer and their tendency to use this potential for the well-being of children.
Similar articles
-
Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.Mol Ecol. 2005 Jan;14(1):19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02395.x. Mol Ecol. 2005. PMID: 15643948
-
Ageing, mate preferences and sexuality: a mini-review.Gerontology. 2009;55(4):371-8. doi: 10.1159/000203698. Epub 2009 Feb 20. Gerontology. 2009. PMID: 19229111 Review.
-
Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts.J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):16-26. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552210. J Sex Res. 2004. PMID: 15216421 Review.
-
Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:77-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408. Epub 2018 Sep 19. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30230999 Review.
-
The sexuality connection in reproductive health.Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Sep-Oct;24(5):269-82. Stud Fam Plann. 1993. PMID: 8296329 Review.
Cited by
-
Condition-dependent trade-offs maintain honest signalling.R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Oct 5;9(10):220335. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220335. eCollection 2022 Oct. R Soc Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 36249330 Free PMC article.
-
Individual's Reproductive Strategies Moderates the Association Between Facial Width-to-Height and Risk-Taking Propensity.Evol Psychol. 2022 Jul-Sep;20(3):14747049221096758. doi: 10.1177/14747049221096758. Evol Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35791511 Free PMC article.
-
Too Many Males or Too Many Females? Classroom Sex Ratio, Life History Strategies and Risk-Taking Behaviors.J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Oct;51(10):2033-2045. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01635-z. Epub 2022 Jun 1. J Youth Adolesc. 2022. PMID: 35648260 Free PMC article.
-
Are Toxoplasma-infected subjects more attractive, symmetrical, or healthier than non-infected ones? Evidence from subjective and objective measurements.PeerJ. 2022 Mar 25;10:e13122. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13122. eCollection 2022. PeerJ. 2022. PMID: 35356475 Free PMC article.
-
The Peacock Fallacy: Art as a Veblenian Signal.Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 22;12:767409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767409. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34880815 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
