Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Mar;16(3):113-6.
doi: 10.1023/a:1022594729197.

Endometrial evaluation is not predictive for in vitro fertilization treatment

Affiliations

Endometrial evaluation is not predictive for in vitro fertilization treatment

G Csemiczky et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate ovarian function by clomiphene citrate (CC) challenge test in a group of tubal infertile women and to study endometrial morphological maturation in the early luteal phase of CC-stimulated cycles as compared to in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment outcome.

Methods and results: Four women presented with strongly retarded, proliferative endometrium in the luteal phase. Of these, three presented with impaired ovarian function, high basal follicle-stimulating hormone, and high follicle-stimulating hormone levels after clomiphene stimulation on cycle day 10. In the remaining 30 women, showing an in-phase endometrium after CC stimulation, a comparison of six morphological characteristics did not reveal any significant differences between the 14 women who did become pregnant and the 16 who did not. No significant differences in endometrial thickness were observed between the groups. Significant differences were found when comparing estradiol and progesterone area under the curve during the luteal phase (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively) between those who did and those who did not become pregnant.

Conclusions: Luteal endometrium morphology was not a sharp instrument to detect differences between women who did and women who did not become pregnant following IVF treatment, while ovarian function, as measured by hormonal markers, seemed to be a more reliable prognostic factor for IVF treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams M, Garrisi J, Guzman I, Sandler B, Fox J, Schreiner-Engel P, Hofmann GE, Grunfeld L. An insight into early reproductive processes through the in vivo model of ovum donation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72:408–414. - PubMed
    1. Csemiczky G, Hagenfeldt K, Wramsby H. Selection of ovarian stimulation protocol is related to IVF treatment outcome in women 35 years of age and older. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:474–477. - PubMed
    1. Schmidt-Sarosi C, Kaplan DR, Sarosi P, Essing MN, Licciardi FL, Keltz M, Levitz M. Ovulation triggering in clomiphene citrate-stimulated cycles: Human chorionic gonadotropin versus a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:167–173. - PubMed
    1. Bonhoff AJ, Naether OGJ, Johannisson E. Effects of clomiphene citrate stimulation on endometrial structure in infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:844–849. - PubMed
    1. Landgren B-M, Unden AL, Diczfalusy E. Hormonal profile of the cycle in 68 normally menstruating women. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1980;94:89–98. - PubMed

MeSH terms