Como você pode otimizar o tratamento de erros e o gerenciamento de exceções na automação de processos com RPA?

One thing I believe is highly beneficial is having the FMEA document ready. Having the failure mode analysis will help catch the errors and exceptions proactively and prevent them. And thorough testing during UAT is a must on all applicable scenarios.

We need to anticipate for the type of errors we will in the development phase. Need to define different exception notification path for system errors and data errors. Define validations for data will optimize the possibility of data errors. Too much exceptions notification will also effect optimization of the process. Defining possible execptions at design phase will help you for better handling in development phase

Lets understand from UiPath perspective 1)Make sure the Application page loads completely before the bot perform any action. Retrying would help some times 2)Analyze the application and then decide the activities. Ex: Hotkeys work better than Click activities 3)The process should stop if there is a Consecutive System exception 4)Send an email to the internal team if unexpected happens in the process 5)Use Try Catch block, Throw, Rethrow wherever needed. Use log message to write the exception details 6)Validate the input before processing the data 7)Close all the Applications before the process starts 8)Capture exception screenshots and save 9)Document the exceptions helps to improve the process 10)Enable available recording options

Prior to launching any process, it's essential to conduct thorough stress testing. In my professional journey, I've found that incorporating robust data controls proves to be consistently effective. Additionally, when designing a process, it's prudent to explore the inclusion of a manual override feature to address potential system failures. Personally, I prefer testing data in a dedicated, isolated environment to avoid disruption for existing users. Also, integrating notification controls within the process ensures prompt alerts in case of any anomalies.

There are 2 types of exceptions available on any programming languages for now we focus on UiPath, 1. Even the error comes if we retry it will work again( like if an application is not loading quickly) 2. This one is no matter how many times we retry it will not move forward (ex: a wrong input or application is down for specific amount of time) in RPA like any programming language we can catch these exceptions using try catch (try to execute the process and catch if there is an exception and add appropriate steps) Also we need to understand the process thoroughly so we can catch all the exceptions during the development itself, but exception is inevitable that's why we have to catch unknown exceptions also and add the alternate steps)

We should always think the bot will fail and what if it fails , what are the alternate steps we need to do to make the process stops smoothly. in RPA like any programming language we can catch these exceptions using try catch (try to execute the process and catch if there is an exception and add appropriate steps) Also we need to understand the process thoroughly so we can catch all the exceptions during the development itself, but exception is inevitable that's why we have to catch unknown exceptions also and add the alternate steps test multiple number of times before going into the production and identify all the possible exceptions which can occur in our process Use throw to throw any custom exceptions and catch it and move forward

Underlying idea is to proactively address potential errors and exceptions during the development phase, ensuring that systems are equipped to handle unexpected issues. This approach promotes robustness and reliability in processes, minimizing the impact of errors and enhancing overall system resilience. Basically, we have to design the process using Tr-Catch which help us to caught the error. Try - Code that might generate an exception is placed inside a "try" block. Catch - Immediately following the try block, there is a "catch" block. The catch block contains code that handles the exception—this could involve logging the error, displaying a message, or taking other corrective actions

Create a separate module for handling errors with specific arguments and custom logic for severity of errors. The module should also log errors in a database and generate notifications along with screenshots. Call that module inside catch block and pass the necessary arguments based on the error type. This will increase resuability and consistency.

Proactive Planning: Anticipating potential errors during process design allows for the strategic incorporation of try-catch blocks, conditional statements, and loops, ensuring a proactive approach to error handling. Holistic Approach: Integrating error-handling mechanisms into the initial design fosters a holistic perspective, enabling seamless identification and resolution of issues at every step of the automation process. Traceability through Logging: Utilizing logging tools during the design phase establishes a traceable record of process execution, facilitating efficient debugging and troubleshooting when errors or exceptions arise.

Ideally, it's all about who we anticipate errors and action to be take for the specific errors. In UiPath's context here are the few workarounds in an order, Try-Catch Activities: The primary mechanism for handling exceptions in UiPath is the "Try-Catch" activity. Rethrow Activity: The "Rethrow" activity is used inside a "Catch" block to rethrow the caught exception. Finally Block: The "Finally" block is used to specify activities that should be executed regardless of whether an exception occurs or not. Throw Activity: The "Throw" activity is used to manually throw an exception. Global Exception Handler: Allows you to set up a global exception handler at the project level. Logging: This is crucial for troubleshooting and debugging.

Don't send an email to the business for every exception. Instead, create an excel log with the successful and failure status and send this file to the business at the end Send a process start email to the business so that they know when the execution has started Automate notifying(email) the users when given input is invalid If something is wrong with the application in the middle of the execution then don't just stop the process. Notify the users on the issue and share the processed data status in a log then stop Documenting every exception helps to remember what exceptions were handled previously and what additional exceptions need to be handled Creating dashboards based on the reporting would help to analyze& improvise the process

If any exceptions occurs be it a known or unknown exception we should make the developer or the business aware so they can move forward with the next approach. Always have a log stored somewhere in a central or local repository so we identify where exactly the error comes so we can also quickly make the required changes. If that is an business exception and bot cannot move forward we should send an alert to the business team so they can do the process manually or let the client knows.

Establish a well-defined escalation and notification mechanism. This implies a desire for a structured process that facilitates the smooth handling of issues or situations that require escalation, ensuring that relevant parties are promptly notified. The emphasis is on creating clarity and efficiency in addressing and communicating issues as they arise. In the event of any exceptions, whether they are known or unknown, it is essential to notify the developer or the business promptly. This notification ensures that they are informed and can proceed with the next appropriate course of action

Responsibility Assignment: Clearly defining roles and responsibilities for error resolution establishes accountability, ensuring that the right individuals or teams are aware of and address issues promptly. Timely Notifications: Implementing email, SMS, or dashboard alerts enables real-time notifications, allowing relevant stakeholders to respond promptly to errors and exceptions, minimizing potential disruptions. Structured Escalation Path: Establishing a structured escalation path through ticketing and reporting tools ensures a systematic approach to handling complex issues, preventing them from lingering without attention.

One thing i have found helpful is determine the escalation steps based on the severity of the error. For example, you might want to notify a team lead for minor errors but escalate to a manager or support team for critical failures. Here are the below other aspacts need to be considered, Centralized Notification Function: Consider creating a centralized function or workflow for sending notifications. This ensures consistency and makes it easier to update notification logic if needed. Monitoring and Reporting: Implement monitoring and reporting mechanisms to keep track of errors and notifications over time. This can help in analyzing patterns and improving the automation process.

This is an important step as we cannot say we identify all the errors and handled it gracefully. we should test and identify the possible exceptions and handle that as well. the last step is we should monitor the process regularly once it went into the production and update the bot to handle those exceptions as well.

Practice involves assessing and evaluating the efficiency, effectiveness, and alignment of various procedures within a business or project. By routinely testing processes, organizations can identify areas for improvement, streamline operations, and ensure that they remain adaptable to changing circumstances, ->Continuous Improvement ->Adaptability ->Resource Optimization ->Quality Assurance ->Risk Management Identification of bottlenecks, inefficiencies, or potential risks, enabling timely corrective actions. RPA. It was able great ensure the testing, both the business & system/application in multiple way. Regularly collect the feedback add-on the change to delivery the better product.

Testing is a crucial step in ensuring that your workflows are robust, reliable, and perform as expected. Here are key aspects and approaches to consider for testing automation projects: Unit Testing: Break down your automation project into smaller units, such as individual activities or sequence Data Security and Privacy: Ensure that sensitive data is handled securely and that your automation complies with data privacy regulations Performance Testing: Assess the performance of your automation by executing it with different data sets and under varying conditions. User Acceptance Testing (UAT): Collaborate with end-users or stakeholders to perform user acceptance testing.

Regular process testing ensures reliability: Scenario-based Scripts: Define diverse scenarios in test scripts to cover process variations. Test Data Alignment: Prepare data corresponding to each scenario for thorough validation. UAT Validation: Execute all scenarios during UAT to confirm functionality. Business User Confirmation: Validate scenarios with users to ensure real-world alignment. This method ensures comprehensive testing, aligning processes with actual business needs for reliability.

According to my experience, before reviewing exception management or documenting errors in the processes, you must continually review, analyze and optimize the processes, know the root cause of the errors, where you are failing to eliminate and/or control them. Minimize exceptions and define clear rules to ensure that development is a success.

Analyzing errors provides valuable insights into the weaknesses of a process, enabling organizations to refine and optimize their automation workflows. By identifying the root causes of errors, teams can implement corrective measures and enhance the overall efficiency and reliability of automated processes. Continuous improvement and leveraging performance from errors and exceptions contribute to the evolution of robust and resilient process automation systems Some key points to improve performance of process from error/exception, ->Error Analysis ->Continuous Improvement ->Adaptability ->Feedback Loop ->Testing and Validation ->Risk Mitigation

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) will help us on leartn from errors and improve your automation processes. Conducting a thorough root cause analysis is crucial for improving the robustness and reliability of your workflows. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to perform root cause analysis in UiPath: Use the UiPath Studio debugging features to step through your workflow one activity at a time. This can help pinpoint the exact location where the issue occurs. Document your findings throughout the root cause analysis process. This documentation can be useful for reference and future troubleshooting Once you identify the root cause, implement the necessary fixes or improvements in your automation workflow

Yes, When it comes to Robotic Process Automation (RPA), it’s important to learn from your errors and exceptions:- 1- By taking the time to analyze your RPA failures, you can discover inefficiencies, identify potential improvements, and gain valuable insight into how to better optimize your processes. For instance, you can review your automation logs or feedbacks to see which steps are taking longer than expected or which tasks are causing errors. 2- Using analytics to gain further insight into your process. By tracking the data associated with each step of the automation,you can identify areas where you can make further improvements and ensure that your process is running smoothly.

Absolutely, fostering a culture of transparency and embracing failures as learning experiences is essential. It encourages open communication, facilitates shared insights, and ultimately contributes to a more resilient and innovative environment.

Knowing the origin or cause of the detected incidents, we can implement improvements that help us perfect the parameters initially defined to increasingly improve our solution.

Following best practices and standards for error handling in process automation with RPA can significantly optimize error handling &exception management. Specific exception handling, and input validation contribute to a robust automation framework. Logging error messages with meaningful information, including stack traces, allows for quick diagnosis during troubleshooting. Try-Catch blocks and global exception handlers prevent workflows from crashing due to unforeseen errors. Standardized approaches, custom exception types, and global exception handlers make it easier for developers to understand and maintain the code. Continuous improvement, regular reviews, and documentation help in adapting error handling strategies to evolving needs.

An effective error handling and exception management system is crucial for the success of RPA implementations. Here are some of the best practices and standards:- 1. Establish clear policies and procedures for error handling and exception management. 2. Ensure that RPA bots are regularly tested and monitored for errors and exceptions. 3. Set up an efficient logging system to track errors and exceptions. 4. Develop an automated process for handling exceptions and errors. 5. Create a plan for responding to errors and exceptions in a timely manner. 6. Put in place a system for continuously improving error handling and exception management.

The best practices and standards followed on each RPA platform will vary based on the tool. In UiPath's context, the inbuild project template RE Framework( Robotic Enterprise Framework)which is a project template based on State Machines. It is created to fit all of the best practices regarding logging, exception handling, application initialization, and others, being ready to tackle a complex business scenario. Another apporach is, UiPath Automation Ops is a centralized, web-based platform that enables administrators to configure and deploy governance policies for UiPath Studio, UiPath Robot, and UiPath Assistant. Governance policies offer control over various functionalities, ensure that standards are met and that rules are followed.

1. Comprehensive Error Handling: Implement a robust error handling mechanism that captures and logs errors at each step of the automation process. This can include capturing error messages, stack traces, and relevant contextual information. 2. Error Logging and Reporting: Maintain a centralized error log that records all errors encountered during the automation process. This log can be used for analysis, identifying patterns, and improving the automation workflow. 3. Continuous Monitoring and Improvement: Regularly monitor the automation process for errors and exceptions. Analyze the root causes of errors and identify areas for improvement.

Indeed the bast practices are quite important. But as my experience thought me is that the creation of a custom framework based on the standards will bring you to the next level. As every client has differend needs and tools to automate, the standards should be shifted towards these needs.

The best way to approach this is by using 80:20 rule from Lean Six Sigma. It simply says - 80% of your errors are due to 20% of the issues. With that said we can use a pareto chart which will help you plot this. Now simply sort and select the top 20% of your issues which contribute to the max errors. Now that you have identified which errors to focus on, dig further; analysis the errors and action accordingly.

In any automated process there is always the possibility of a failure, which will almost always be the result of some element, which is why it is important to have spare parts and provide correct maintenance. However, what will help us anticipate the failure is a correct mechanical and programming analysis (PLC or robot) through which we can see the details of how our system is. All failures must be documented with evidence and corrective and preventive action.

Lessons learnt as part of project management is critical after each project closure. Ensure the team measures itself on Planned Vs. Actual efforts & Costs. Team should always ensure they are moving across the maturity continuum and do not aspire to boil the ocean by taking on too much. Project scoping is extremely critical and needs to be signed off by all key stakeholders including the customer / client representative. Team members can cross train themselves to be of more utility to the team and can take up bigger loads.

Determining the action to be taken when encountering specific types of errors is highly important here. For instance: For Business Exceptions, how we notify this to business counterparts and how we proceed with the next transaction or item to be processed by the automation solution. For System Exceptions, it's all about how we retry it and what kind of counter mechanism we have implemented as part of our automation solution.

During requirement gathering: Collaborate with stakeholders to foresee potential exceptions based on historical data or anticipated scenarios. Distinguish between issues related to business logic and those tied to system functionalities. Business Exceptions: Recognize exceptions arising from business rules or data discrepancies. Define methods like data validation, alternate paths, or user notifications to address business logic-related exceptions within the solution design. System Exceptions: Identify issues stemming from technical infrastructure or external dependencies. Incorporate mechanisms for IT notifications, retry functionalities, or error logging to manage technical issues.