Skip to main content

All Questions

5 votes
7 answers
1k views

What is the use in arguing for or against the existence of metaphysical things?

It seems to me that we ought to be rather indifferent to their existence. Take free will, for example. By the nature of how it's defined, and its incompatibility with science, it can't be proven nor ...
Joseph_Kopp's user avatar
0 votes
6 answers
440 views

Please criticize my argument for a first cause

Salaamualykum, I would like this argument to be strengthened by criticism: Everything has a cause, by cause I mean mean something that "therefores it" regardless of your definition. if ...
loopit's user avatar
  • 119
2 votes
2 answers
417 views

What is the best/most convincing objection to the Ontological Argument?

In A History of Western Philosophy, Bertrand Russell says (p. 568) Kant countered this argument by maintaining that “existence” is not a predicate. Another kind of refutation results from my theory ...
sket's user avatar
  • 321
-2 votes
1 answer
122 views

Why is the universe too big for us to explore? [closed]

It almost seems like a cruel joke that the universe would birth creatures with extremely curious minds and a sense of exploration and make the distances between stars too far for reasonable ...
Max's user avatar
  • 1
1 vote
2 answers
88 views

Is the claim that a non conscious entity cannot create a conscious entity valid?

In a debate I watched online, the theist person claimed that conscious creatures, such as humans, can only be created by a conscious being, because a non conscious being isn't able to give this ...
Mocas's user avatar
  • 157
-2 votes
3 answers
643 views

If Non-existence is nonexistent, then does that mean a Supernatural Exists?

Ok, what I am asking is bascially, if non-existence (which I use synonymously with the word 'nothing' - this is my defintion of 'nothing' in this piece - non-existence, so please no dcitionary ...
Simon's user avatar
  • 1