Timeline for Is there any ackonowledgement and solution for the objection raised on ontological argument using problem of evil?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2022 at 19:18 | comment | added | Wtjtykajwy | Added the link. plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/#TaxOntArg | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 19:16 | comment | added | Wtjtykajwy | Ok Will try to add them | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 18:37 | comment | added | Dcleve | @Wtjtykajwy -- add links or summaries to these other arguments, if you want them addressed as well. I am not familiar with either you just mentioned. | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 18:05 | comment | added | Wtjtykajwy | I'm not specifically asking about Anselm's ontological argument. I'm talking about al kinds of Ontological argument like the Godel, Modal etc. | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 18:03 | comment | added | Wtjtykajwy | Agree with all your points. I'm trying to explore specifically how problem of evil impacts ontological argument. I'm not trying to just disaprove ontological argument. | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 17:41 | comment | added | Dcleve | @Wtjtykajwy -- getting out of "contingency" is tough for any specific religion. A Triune God is not "maximal", as mono-God Muslims point out. The even MORE mono-God Sikhs point out their "God is Everything" is greater than the separate Islamic God. But Sikhs cannot defend the specificity of the poems and poets of the Granth Sahib as NECESSARILY MAXIMAL! An abstract "God of the Philosophers" is all Anselm can argue for, and even that is rejected by most people today as an invalid rationale | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 17:36 | comment | added | Wtjtykajwy | Plz check the edit | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 17:19 | comment | added | Wtjtykajwy | Umm disagree, it's valid for all times. I'm explaining it in an edit. | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 17:18 | history | answered | Dcleve | CC BY-SA 4.0 |