Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • Umm disagree, it's valid for all times. I'm explaining it in an edit.
    – Wtjtykajwy
    Commented Aug 26, 2022 at 17:19
  • Plz check the edit
    – Wtjtykajwy
    Commented Aug 26, 2022 at 17:36
  • @Wtjtykajwy -- getting out of "contingency" is tough for any specific religion. A Triune God is not "maximal", as mono-God Muslims point out. The even MORE mono-God Sikhs point out their "God is Everything" is greater than the separate Islamic God. But Sikhs cannot defend the specificity of the poems and poets of the Granth Sahib as NECESSARILY MAXIMAL! An abstract "God of the Philosophers" is all Anselm can argue for, and even that is rejected by most people today as an invalid rationale
    – Dcleve
    Commented Aug 26, 2022 at 17:41
  • Agree with all your points. I'm trying to explore specifically how problem of evil impacts ontological argument. I'm not trying to just disaprove ontological argument.
    – Wtjtykajwy
    Commented Aug 26, 2022 at 18:03
  • 1
    @Wtjtykajwy -- add links or summaries to these other arguments, if you want them addressed as well. I am not familiar with either you just mentioned.
    – Dcleve
    Commented Aug 26, 2022 at 18:37