Edit - Philosophy Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Interesting answer but it is not relevant to the situation, which is that not only the argument proves omnipotence illogical, but that humans are logical beings. As such, the argument is really problematic for people claiming that there is an omnipotent god. They may try to deny any validity to it, but their logical nature means that they do get the point. Your idea is akin to the idea that we may be living in a simulation. This might be true but most people are not going to believe that. The undeniable fact is that our innate logical sense makes omnipotence nonsensical.
– Speakpigeon
Commented Dec 15, 2021 at 18:30

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>
[example](https://example.com)
<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »