Timeline for Is there such a thing as an argument from unconstrained possibilities against God?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2023 at 6:42 | history | edited | tkruse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 274 characters in body
|
| Jul 19, 2023 at 6:33 | comment | added | tkruse | No, this just makes a god that is limited or otherwise self-restraining more probable than an omnipotent god focused on fastest results. It does not have enough weight to make atheism more logical. | |
| Jul 19, 2023 at 6:31 | history | edited | tkruse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 166 characters in body
|
| Jul 18, 2023 at 23:06 | comment | added | user62907 | The argument is not that that kind of god cannot exist. The argument is that there are an infinite number of gods you can think of who can do things in an infinite number of ways. But the ways in which things are done without god are extremely limited given physical laws. So it seems more probable to just assume no god | |
| Jul 18, 2023 at 21:53 | history | answered | tkruse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |