Edit - Philosophy Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Rev

The argument is not that that kind of god cannot exist. The argument is that there are an infinite number of gods you can think of who can do things in an infinite number of ways. But the ways in which things are done without god are extremely limited given physical laws. So it seems more probable to just assume no god
– user62907
Commented Jul 18, 2023 at 23:06
1

No, this just makes a god that is limited or otherwise self-restraining more probable than an omnipotent god focused on fastest results. It does not have enough weight to make atheism more logical.
– tkruse
Commented Jul 19, 2023 at 6:33

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)
<https://example.com>
[example](https://example.com)
<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »