Opinion

In terrible interview, Biden blames ‘bad night’ — when was a good one?

The truth is that President Joe Biden’s interview with George Stepanopoulos was never going to be the magic bullet his allies hoped it might be. 

If his debate with Donald Trump last week was the final nail in his political coffin, the days that have followed it have seen a metric ton of earth heaped on top of it. 

Now that the president’s decline cannot possibly be denied, the dam has broken.

Biden, as it turns out, can no longer recall the names of longtime family friends or keep up with his peers across the globe.

What to know about the fallout from President Biden's debate performance:

His staff is leaking like a faucet, elected Democrats are openly calling for him to step aside, and the media institutions that had been insulating him from criticism are now holding nothing back.

In a bombshell piece for New York magazine, Olivia Nuzzi wrote Biden had been struggling through noticeably bad and enjoying some good days at least as far back as 2020.

“Good days” aren’t good enough for a commander-in-chief.

But even if they were, the following question still stands: Where are they?

According to Biden’s team, last Thursday was a bad night; this Friday night was another. 

During his conversation with Stephanopoulos, the president failed to enunciate more than two sentences’ worth of words distinctly and reprised the blank stare that so alarmed the country during the debate.



His relaxed grip on reality was exemplified by more than just his appearance and delivery.

Asked if he had watched the debate, a confused Biden replied, “I don’t think I did.”

Asked about Virginia Senator Mark Warner’s effort to get him to stand down, Biden seemed to suggest that Warner was jealous because he had run against him for the Democratic presidential nomination. 

That never happened.

He went on to insist against every shred of available evidence that the presidential race was a “toss-up,” blame his debate performance on crosstalk, and defend himself by testily suggesting that Stephanopoulos had conducted bad interviews over the course of his career.

The post-interview analysis on ABC was grim.

Jonathan Karl reported that “nothing” about it had calmed the nerves of his party’s political class, and it even raised “new concerns.”

Martha Raddatz said that the most glowing review she had heard was that it “wasn’t as bad” as one Democrat expected.

A third panelist delivered the most crushing blow of all: That the “movement against him” was only “growing” on Friday night.

Nothing short of a home run could have revived Biden’s campaign.

If the debate was a three-pitch strikeout, his sit-down with Stephanopoulos was a weak ground out to first base.

Good days are what Biden and his inner circle are clinging to.

Can you remember the last one?