Opinion

What ‘money in politics’ problem? and other commentary

Libertarian: What ‘Money in Politics’ Problem?

Mike Bloomberg “spent $500 million in his bid for a Super Tuesday blitz” — and “came away with . . . American Samoa,” snorts Reason’s Eric Boehm. He didn’t win a single state, a “major disappointment for the billionaire who dumped nine figures of his personal fortune into the race” and “saturated airwaves with his ads.” The same thing happened to billionaire Tom Steyer, who exited after “spending more than $250 million and winning exactly zero delegates.” So much for complaints from Democrats and many Republicans about “the supposedly intolerable influence of money in American politics.” The moral: “Money, at best, buys you a ticket to the dance. It cannot make you the prom king.”

Bernie Bro: Don’t Buy the ‘Electability’ Con

The reason Joe Biden got a “flash coronation” after “a sudden burst of ­coordinated support from the Democratic establishment” is simple, argues The Week’s Ryan Cooper: “He is not Bernie Sanders.” It isn’t that “Biden convinced his competitors” who dropped out and endorsed him, like Pete Buttigieg, “that he had the best policies or the best temperament to take on Donald Trump.” No, “propping up Biden was a desperate reaction” to Sanders’ popular-vote wins in the first three primary states. Elites think Biden is more electable — even though the ex-veep is “clearly suffering some sort of cognitive decline” and has an “appalling record” that’s “utterly at odds with the modern Democratic Party’s branding.” The Democratic establishment “hates and fears” Sanders so much, Cooper sighs, it is working to elect a “fading, washed-up operator with decades of baggage.”

From the left: Biden, Sanders & Dems’ Future

If Joe Biden does go on to win the nomination, asks John Judis at Talking Points Memo, “what does that mean for the future of the Democratic Party?” Sanders “has attracted young voters . . . who understand democratic socialism could actually be something good, who in the absence of union protection on their jobs, and union-negotiated insurance and pensions, look to the federal government to do something about these things — and also want the government to do something about access to higher education, student debt and climate change.” Democrats can “be optimistic that you may have a candidate who can beat Donald Trump” but should worry that if they “can’t hold onto the Bernie generation of voters,” the future may belong to Republicans who speak to “the economic nationalism that Sanders also promoted.”

Refugee: Castro’s ‘Education’ Was Brainwashing

At NBC News Think, Yuri Pérez answers Bernie Sanders’ question — was it “a bad thing” that Fidel Castro “had a massive literacy program”? — with a resounding “Yes.” Cuban-born Pérez, who “came to the United States as a political refugee in 2009,” was “brainwashed” by educators who used “Che Guevara’s teaching” to make students “hate different ideas, looks and behaviors.” The “Cuban educational system is not a ‘literacy program’ but a tool of indoctrination, designed” to create “intolerant” citizens “ready to kill in order to impose the revolutionary ideology.” Indeed, “the ‘education’ under a socialist regime is probably the most malicious of their programs, because it is — to the eyes of people like Sanders — an unalloyed, irreproachable social good” but really “the most ­essential tools of indoctrination and repression.”

Surveillance beat: Watch the Watchmen

“The FBI improperly spied on the Trump campaign in 2016,” thunders Sen. Mike Lee at Fox News — and if it can do that, “imagine what it can do to regular Americans.” Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz ­revealed more than “a dozen ‘serious performance failures’ ” with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants the FBI used to “intercept the communications of President Trump’s campaign supporters.” The “Founding Fathers knew well the danger of a government with the power to snoop through the private communications of law-abiding Americans,” yet “abuse of the government’s surveillance powers is all too common.” Congress must reform FISA, requiring warrant-seeking agencies to show “probable cause” and “be fully honest” with the court. We can’t let these “violations of United States citizens’ civil liberties” ever happen again.

— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board