Abstract
The chapter begins by outlining how some of the central concepts and characteristics of the period — including sympathy, the imagination, lyric poetry, and experiments in nonhuman perception — show many Romantic writers to be displaying a posthumanist sensibility, or what we might think of as a strange kinship. Then, the chapter offers an account of how the field has been traditionally read and of the pathways that have been opened into critical posthumanist approaches. After tracing recent work in Romanticist scholarship that is informed by a posthumanist perspective and methodology, it then provides short posthumanist readings of three canonical Romantic texts: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Percy Bysshe Shelley’s “Mont Blanc,” and John Keats’s “To Autumn.” Following this account of the field, the chapter briefly considers the Romantic roots of a technologically inflected posthumanism to acknowledge the ways the period also participates in a more popular understanding of posthumanism with implications for cyborg theory and virtual reality. Finally, while the focus here is principally on British Romanticism, the chapter also explores how the tentacles of posthumanist thought extend into German and American Romanticisms and offers, in conclusion, some words on where posthumanist scholarship will move in Romantic studies in the years to come, including the need to consider its intersections with critical race studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., & Weinstein, M. (2020). Sylvia Wynter: Science studies and Posthumanism as praxes of being human. Cultural Studies <−> Critical Methodologies, 20(3), 235–250.
Aretoulakis, E. (2014). Towards a Posthumanist ecology: Nature without humanity in Wordsworth and Shelley. European Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 172–190.
Ault, D. (1974). Visionary physics: Blake’s response to Newton. U of Chicago P.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe Halfway. Duke UP.
Barad, K. (2015). TransMaterialities: Trans*/matter/realities and queer political imaginings. GLQ, 21(2–3), 387–422.
Bergren, K. (2019). The global Wordsworth: Romanticism out of place. Bucknell UP.
Bigger Six Collective. (n.d.). Mission. The bigger six Collective. Retrieved April 2, 2021 from https://bigger6romantix.squarespace.com
Bolton, B. (2016). Agency from a stone: Shelley’s Posthumanist experiments in ‘Mont Blanc’. Word and Text, 6(1), 28–47.
Braidotti, B. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.
Broglio, R. (2008). Technologies of the Picturesque: British art, poetry, and instruments, 1750–1830. Bucknell UP.
Broglio, R. (2017). Romantic. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and the Posthuman (pp. 29–40). Cambridge UP.
Bruder, H., & Connolly, T. (Eds.). (2018). Beastly Blake. Palgrave.
Bryant, L. (2011). The democracy of objects. Open Humanities Press.
Callus, I., Herbrechter, S., & Rossini, M. (2014). Introduction: Dis/locating Posthumanism in European literary and critical traditions. European Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 103–120.
Carson, J. (2010). Populism, gender, and sympathy in the romantic novel. Palgrave.
Chandler, M. (2017). Brown romantics: Poetry and nationalism in the global nineteenth century. Bucknell UP.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). New romantic cyborgs: Romanticism, information technology, and the end of the machine. The MIT Press.
Cohen, T., & Colebrook, C. (2017). Vortices: On “Critical climate change” as a project. South Atlantic Quarterly, 116(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3749381
Collings, D. (2014). Stolen future, broken present: The human significance of climate change. Open Humanities Press.
Connolly, T. (2002). William Blake and the body. Palgrave Macmillan.
Crockett, C. (2018). Derrida after the end of writing: Political theology and new materialism. Fordham UP.
de Man, P. (1984). The rhetoric of romanticism. Columbia UP.
de Man, P. (1986). The resistance to theory. U of Minnesota P.
Derrida, J. (1991). Che cos’è la poesia? In P. Kamuf (Ed.), A Derrida reader: Between the blinds (pp. 221–237). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Effinger, E. (2018). In the company of wolves: Blake’s Lyca poems as political fables. In H. Bruder & T. Connolly (Eds.), Beastly Blake (pp. 87–110). Palgrave.
Effinger, E. (2019). Nature’s “every day disabille”: John Clare, shattered vision, and the everyday poetics of noon. RoN, 72–73, 1–33. https://ronjournal.org/articles/n72-73/natures-every-day-disabille-john-clare-shattered-vision-and-the-everyday-poetics-of-noon/
Ellermann, G. (2015). Speculative Romanticism. SubStance, 44(1), 154–174.
Ellis, C. (2018). Antebellum Posthuman: Race and materiality in the mid-nineteenth century. Fordham UP.
Fairclough, M. (2015). The romantic crowd: Sympathy, Controversy and Print Culture. Cambridge UP.
Festa, L. (2019). Fiction without humanity: Person, animal, thing in early enlightenment literature and culture. U of Pennsylvania P.
Gottleib, E. (2016). Romantic realities: Speculative romanticism and British romanticism. Edinburgh UP.
Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the outside: Essays on real and virtual space. MIT P.
Grusin, R. (Ed.). (2015). The nonhuman turn. U of Minnesota P.
Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (Eds.). (1995). Posthuman Bodies. Indiana UP.
Hamilton, P. (2016). Introduction. In P. Hamilton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of European romanticism (pp. 1–12). Oxford UP.
Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm.
Haraway, D. (2006). A cyborg manifesto. In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The transgender studies reader (pp. 103–118). Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. U of Minnesota P.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke UP.
Head, L. (2016). Hope and grief in the anthropocene: Re-conceptualising human-nature relations. Routledge.
Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (2008). What is a Posthumanist Reading? Angelaki, 13(1), 95–111.
Heringman, N. (2019). Science and human Animality in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. The Wordsworth Circle, 50(1), 127–145.
Hessell, N. (2018). Romantic Literature and the Colonised World. Palgrave, 2018.
Heymans, P. (2011). Eating girls: Deleuze and Guattari’s becoming-animal and the romantic sublime in William Blake’s Lyca poems. Humanimalia, 3(1), 1–30.
Jackson, Z. (2020). Becoming human: Matter and meaning in an Antiblack world. NYU P.
Jacobus, M. (2012). Romantic things: A tree, a rock, a cloud. U of Chicago P.
Keats, J. (2005). Letter to Richard woodhouse, 27 October 1818. In G. F. Scott (Ed.), Selected letters of John Keats (Revised. ed., pp. 194–196). Harvard UP.
Kim, J. (2019). Romanticism, Orientialism, Orientation. Keats-Shelley Journal, 68, 134–136.
Klumbytė, G. (2018). Kin. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 225–227). Bloomsbury.
Koretsky, D. (2021). Death rights: Romantic suicide, race, and the bounds of liberalism. SUNY P.
Landgraf, E., Trop, G., & Weatherby, L. (2019). Introduction: Posthumanism after Kant. In Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 1–13). Bloomsbury.
Le Guin, U. (2017). In A. Tsing, H. Swanson, E. Gan, & N. Bubandt (Eds.), Arts of living on a damaged planet. U of Minnesota P.
Lussier, M. (1994). Blake’s vortex: The quantum tunnel in Milton. Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 18(1994), 263–291.
Lussier, M. (2011). Blake, Deleuze, and the emergence of ecological consciousness. In A. Goodbody & K. Rigby (Eds.), Ecocritical theory: New European approaches (pp. 256–269). U of Virginia P.
McGann, J. (1983). The romantic ideology: A critical investigation. U of Chicago P.
Meillassoux, Q. (2010). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Bloomsbury.
Menely, T. (2015). The animal claim: Sensibility and the creaturely voice. U of Chicago P.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Nature (R. Vallier, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern UP.
Mitchell, R. (2007). Sympathy and the state in the romantic era: Systems, state finance, and the shadows of futurity. New York: Routledge.
Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature. Harvard UP.
Morton, T. (2008). John Clare’s dark ecology. Studies in Romanticism, 47(2), 179–193.
Morton, T. (2011). Here comes everything: The promise of object-oriented ontology. Qui Parle, 19(2), 163–190.
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects. U of Minnesota P.
Mousley, A. (2016). The Posthuman. In A. Smith (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Frankenstein (pp. 158–172). Cambridge UP.
Muri, A. (2007). The enlightenment cyborg: A history of communications and control in the human machine, 1660–1830. U of Toronto P.
Otto, P. (2011). Multiplying worlds: Romanticism, modernity, and the emergence of virtual reality. Oxford UP.
Oliver, K. (2009). Animal lessons: How they teach us to be human. Columbia University Press.
Peckham, M. (1951). Toward a theory of romanticism. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 66(2), 5–23.
Piccitto, D. (2018). Apocalyptic visions, heroism, and intersections of the human and ‘the not human’ in Blake’s Milton. In H. Bruder & T. Connolly (Eds.), Beastly Blake (pp. 111–133). Palgrave.
Plotnitsky, A. (2007). Chaosmic orders: Nonclassical physics, allegory, and the epistemology of Blake’s minute particulars. Romantic Circles Praxis Series.
Rajan, T. (1980). Dark interpreter: The discourse of romanticism. Cornell UP.
Riggs, D., & Peel, E. (2016). Critical kinship studies: An introduction to the field. Palgrave.
Sandler, M. (2020). The black romantic revolution: Abolitionist poets at the end of slavery. Verso.
Shaviro, S. (2014). Universe of things: On speculative realism. U of Minnesota P.
Singer, K. (2020). It’s the end of the world and I feel queer: Mary Shelley, queer affect, and shapeshifting through the last Man. In K. Singer, A. Cross, & S. Barnett (Eds.), Material transgressions: Beyond romantic bodies, genders, things (pp. 213–232). Liverpool UP.
Singer, K., Cross, A., & Barnett, S. (2020). Introduction: Living in a new material world. In K. Singer, A. Cross, & S. Barnett (Eds.), Material transgressions: Beyond romantic bodies, genders, things (pp. 1–28). Liverpool UP.
Squier, S. (1995). Reproducing the Posthuman body: Ectogenetic fetus, surrogate mother, pregnant Man. In J. Halberstam & I. Livingston (Eds.), Posthuman Bodies (pp. 113–132). Indiana UP.
Stryker, S. (1994). My words to victor Frankenstein above the village of Chamounix. GLQ, 1, 237–254.
Stryker, S. (2019). More words about ‘my words to victor Frankenstein’. GLQ, 25(1), 39–44.
Taylor, M. (2013). Universes without us: Posthuman cosmologies in American literature. U of Minnesota P.
Thomson, J. (1730). The seasons, a hymn, a poem to the memory of sir isaac newton, and britannia, a poem. By Mr. Thomson. printed for J. Millan, near whitehall; and A. Millar, in the strand, MDCCXXX. Eighteenth century collections online, http://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CW0112624885/ECCO?u=fred46430&sid=bookmark-ECCO&xid=3d8fa578&pg=1. Accessed 11 Feb 2022.
Vermeulen, P. (2014). Posthuman affect. European Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 121–134.
von Uexküll, J. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans with a theory of meaning. U of Minnesota P.
Walcott, R. (2014). The problem of the human: Black ontologies and ‘the coloniality of our being’. In S. Bröck-Sallah & C. Junker (Eds.), Postcoloniality-Decoloniality-black critique: Joints and fissures (pp. 93–107). Campus Verlag.
Washington, C. (2015). Romanticism and speculative realism. Literature Compass, 12(9), 448–460.
Washington, C. (2019). Romantic revelations: Visions of post-apocalyptic life and Hope in the Anthropocene. U of Toronto P.
Washington, C., & McCarthy, A. (Eds.). (2019). Romanticism and speculative realism. Bloomsbury.
Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the Coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Toward the human, after Man, its overrepresentation – An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Effinger, E. (2022). Romanticism and Critical Posthumanism. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_5-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_5-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities