Skip to main content

Romanticism and Critical Posthumanism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism

Abstract

The chapter begins by outlining how some of the central concepts and characteristics of the period — including sympathy, the imagination, lyric poetry, and experiments in nonhuman perception — show many Romantic writers to be displaying a posthumanist sensibility, or what we might think of as a strange kinship. Then, the chapter offers an account of how the field has been traditionally read and of the pathways that have been opened into critical posthumanist approaches. After tracing recent work in Romanticist scholarship that is informed by a posthumanist perspective and methodology, it then provides short posthumanist readings of three canonical Romantic texts: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Percy Bysshe Shelley’s “Mont Blanc,” and John Keats’s “To Autumn.” Following this account of the field, the chapter briefly considers the Romantic roots of a technologically inflected posthumanism to acknowledge the ways the period also participates in a more popular understanding of posthumanism with implications for cyborg theory and virtual reality. Finally, while the focus here is principally on British Romanticism, the chapter also explores how the tentacles of posthumanist thought extend into German and American Romanticisms and offers, in conclusion, some words on where posthumanist scholarship will move in Romantic studies in the years to come, including the need to consider its intersections with critical race studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J., & Weinstein, M. (2020). Sylvia Wynter: Science studies and Posthumanism as praxes of being human. Cultural Studies <−> Critical Methodologies, 20(3), 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aretoulakis, E. (2014). Towards a Posthumanist ecology: Nature without humanity in Wordsworth and Shelley. European Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 172–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ault, D. (1974). Visionary physics: Blake’s response to Newton. U of Chicago P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe Halfway. Duke UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2015). TransMaterialities: Trans*/matter/realities and queer political imaginings. GLQ, 21(2–3), 387–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergren, K. (2019). The global Wordsworth: Romanticism out of place. Bucknell UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigger Six Collective. (n.d.). Mission. The bigger six Collective. Retrieved April 2, 2021 from https://bigger6romantix.squarespace.com

  • Bolton, B. (2016). Agency from a stone: Shelley’s Posthumanist experiments in ‘Mont Blanc’. Word and Text, 6(1), 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, B. (2017). Posthuman critical theory. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broglio, R. (2008). Technologies of the Picturesque: British art, poetry, and instruments, 1750–1830. Bucknell UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broglio, R. (2017). Romantic. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and the Posthuman (pp. 29–40). Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruder, H., & Connolly, T. (Eds.). (2018). Beastly Blake. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L. (2011). The democracy of objects. Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callus, I., Herbrechter, S., & Rossini, M. (2014). Introduction: Dis/locating Posthumanism in European literary and critical traditions. European Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. (2010). Populism, gender, and sympathy in the romantic novel. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, M. (2017). Brown romantics: Poetry and nationalism in the global nineteenth century. Bucknell UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). New romantic cyborgs: Romanticism, information technology, and the end of the machine. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, T., & Colebrook, C. (2017). Vortices: On “Critical climate change” as a project. South Atlantic Quarterly, 116(1), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3749381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collings, D. (2014). Stolen future, broken present: The human significance of climate change. Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T. (2002). William Blake and the body. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, C. (2018). Derrida after the end of writing: Political theology and new materialism. Fordham UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Man, P. (1984). The rhetoric of romanticism. Columbia UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Man, P. (1986). The resistance to theory. U of Minnesota P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1991). Che cos’è la poesia? In P. Kamuf (Ed.), A Derrida reader: Between the blinds (pp. 221–237). Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Effinger, E. (2018). In the company of wolves: Blake’s Lyca poems as political fables. In H. Bruder & T. Connolly (Eds.), Beastly Blake (pp. 87–110). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Effinger, E. (2019). Nature’s “every day disabille”: John Clare, shattered vision, and the everyday poetics of noon. RoN, 72–73, 1–33. https://ronjournal.org/articles/n72-73/natures-every-day-disabille-john-clare-shattered-vision-and-the-everyday-poetics-of-noon/

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellermann, G. (2015). Speculative Romanticism. SubStance, 44(1), 154–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2018). Antebellum Posthuman: Race and materiality in the mid-nineteenth century. Fordham UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, M. (2015). The romantic crowd: Sympathy, Controversy and Print Culture. Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa, L. (2019). Fiction without humanity: Person, animal, thing in early enlightenment literature and culture. U of Pennsylvania P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottleib, E. (2016). Romantic realities: Speculative romanticism and British romanticism. Edinburgh UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the outside: Essays on real and virtual space. MIT P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, R. (Ed.). (2015). The nonhuman turn. U of Minnesota P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (Eds.). (1995). Posthuman Bodies. Indiana UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, P. (2016). Introduction. In P. Hamilton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of European romanticism (pp. 1–12). Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2006). A cyborg manifesto. In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The transgender studies reader (pp. 103–118). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. U of Minnesota P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, L. (2016). Hope and grief in the anthropocene: Re-conceptualising human-nature relations. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (2008). What is a Posthumanist Reading? Angelaki, 13(1), 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heringman, N. (2019). Science and human Animality in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. The Wordsworth Circle, 50(1), 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessell, N. (2018). Romantic Literature and the Colonised World. Palgrave, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymans, P. (2011). Eating girls: Deleuze and Guattari’s becoming-animal and the romantic sublime in William Blake’s Lyca poems. Humanimalia, 3(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Z. (2020). Becoming human: Matter and meaning in an Antiblack world. NYU P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobus, M. (2012). Romantic things: A tree, a rock, a cloud. U of Chicago P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keats, J. (2005). Letter to Richard woodhouse, 27 October 1818. In G. F. Scott (Ed.), Selected letters of John Keats (Revised. ed., pp. 194–196). Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2019). Romanticism, Orientialism, Orientation. Keats-Shelley Journal, 68, 134–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumbytė, G. (2018). Kin. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 225–227). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koretsky, D. (2021). Death rights: Romantic suicide, race, and the bounds of liberalism. SUNY P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landgraf, E., Trop, G., & Weatherby, L. (2019). Introduction: Posthumanism after Kant. In Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 1–13). Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guin, U. (2017). In A. Tsing, H. Swanson, E. Gan, & N. Bubandt (Eds.), Arts of living on a damaged planet. U of Minnesota P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussier, M. (1994). Blake’s vortex: The quantum tunnel in Milton. Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 18(1994), 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussier, M. (2011). Blake, Deleuze, and the emergence of ecological consciousness. In A. Goodbody & K. Rigby (Eds.), Ecocritical theory: New European approaches (pp. 256–269). U of Virginia P.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, J. (1983). The romantic ideology: A critical investigation. U of Chicago P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, Q. (2010). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menely, T. (2015). The animal claim: Sensibility and the creaturely voice. U of Chicago P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). Nature (R. Vallier, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. (2007). Sympathy and the state in the romantic era: Systems, state finance, and the shadows of futurity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature. Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2008). John Clare’s dark ecology. Studies in Romanticism, 47(2), 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2011). Here comes everything: The promise of object-oriented ontology. Qui Parle, 19(2), 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects. U of Minnesota P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousley, A. (2016). The Posthuman. In A. Smith (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Frankenstein (pp. 158–172). Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muri, A. (2007). The enlightenment cyborg: A history of communications and control in the human machine, 1660–1830. U of Toronto P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, P. (2011). Multiplying worlds: Romanticism, modernity, and the emergence of virtual reality. Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K. (2009). Animal lessons: How they teach us to be human. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckham, M. (1951). Toward a theory of romanticism. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 66(2), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccitto, D. (2018). Apocalyptic visions, heroism, and intersections of the human and ‘the not human’ in Blake’s Milton. In H. Bruder & T. Connolly (Eds.), Beastly Blake (pp. 111–133). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotnitsky, A. (2007). Chaosmic orders: Nonclassical physics, allegory, and the epistemology of Blake’s minute particulars. Romantic Circles Praxis Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, T. (1980). Dark interpreter: The discourse of romanticism. Cornell UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D., & Peel, E. (2016). Critical kinship studies: An introduction to the field. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, M. (2020). The black romantic revolution: Abolitionist poets at the end of slavery. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S. (2014). Universe of things: On speculative realism. U of Minnesota P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, K. (2020). It’s the end of the world and I feel queer: Mary Shelley, queer affect, and shapeshifting through the last Man. In K. Singer, A. Cross, & S. Barnett (Eds.), Material transgressions: Beyond romantic bodies, genders, things (pp. 213–232). Liverpool UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, K., Cross, A., & Barnett, S. (2020). Introduction: Living in a new material world. In K. Singer, A. Cross, & S. Barnett (Eds.), Material transgressions: Beyond romantic bodies, genders, things (pp. 1–28). Liverpool UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squier, S. (1995). Reproducing the Posthuman body: Ectogenetic fetus, surrogate mother, pregnant Man. In J. Halberstam & I. Livingston (Eds.), Posthuman Bodies (pp. 113–132). Indiana UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1994). My words to victor Frankenstein above the village of Chamounix. GLQ, 1, 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2019). More words about ‘my words to victor Frankenstein’. GLQ, 25(1), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2013). Universes without us: Posthuman cosmologies in American literature. U of Minnesota P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. (1730). The seasons, a hymn, a poem to the memory of sir isaac newton, and britannia, a poem. By Mr. Thomson. printed for J. Millan, near whitehall; and A. Millar, in the strand, MDCCXXX. Eighteenth century collections online, http://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CW0112624885/ECCO?u=fred46430&sid=bookmark-ECCO&xid=3d8fa578&pg=1. Accessed 11 Feb 2022.

  • Vermeulen, P. (2014). Posthuman affect. European Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J. (2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans with a theory of meaning. U of Minnesota P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott, R. (2014). The problem of the human: Black ontologies and ‘the coloniality of our being’. In S. Bröck-Sallah & C. Junker (Eds.), Postcoloniality-Decoloniality-black critique: Joints and fissures (pp. 93–107). Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, C. (2015). Romanticism and speculative realism. Literature Compass, 12(9), 448–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, C. (2019). Romantic revelations: Visions of post-apocalyptic life and Hope in the Anthropocene. U of Toronto P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, C., & McCarthy, A. (Eds.). (2019). Romanticism and speculative realism. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the Coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Toward the human, after Man, its overrepresentation – An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Effinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Effinger, E. (2022). Romanticism and Critical Posthumanism. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_5-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_5-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42681-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics