Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Underreporting of Dietary Intake: Key Issues for Weight Management Clinicians

  • Obesity and Diet (G. Roa, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Underreporting of dietary intake is common in obesity treatment programs. Accurate reporting through daily food diaries is essential for organizing and personalizing treatment. This review explores key concerns for clinicians, summarizes the state of research on causes of underreporting and ways to promote consistency and accuracy, and identifies areas of need for future research.

Recent Findings

Dietary underreporting is a cross-cultural phenomenon, and obesity is the most consistent correlate. The association with BMI may be mediated by factors like socioeconomic status, gender, and body image. People with obesity—particularly women—tend to underreport high energy foods and those considered socially undesirable. Underreporting may be due to conscious or unconscious processes and is also influenced by literacy issues and the features of reporting tools. Perceived social pressure plays a role in underreporting, as does inconvenience of reporting. Web- and smartphone-based reporting options offer alternatives to paper-based reporting, but are prone to the same underreporting issues and may not accurately capture energy and micronutrient content. Some evidence indicates frequency and consistency of reporting are more important for weight loss than accuracy.

Summary

Dietary underreporting remains a major issue in weight management for obesity. The majority of studies are descriptive, identifying associations but not incorporating psychometric tests or qualitative methods like interviews or focus groups to explore underlying issues. Multidisciplinary research is needed to better understand why people underreport and inform strategies to improve quality and consistency of reporting and aid patients with obesity in adhering to dietary goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Shay LE, Seibert D, Watts D, Sbrocco T, Pagliara C. Adherence and weight loss outcomes associated with food-exercise diary preference in a military weight management program. Eat Behav. 2009;10(4):220–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Painter SL, Ahmed R, Hill JO, Kushner RF, Lindquist R, Brunning S, et al. What matters in weight loss? An in-depth analysis of self-monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e160.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Laitner MH, Minski SA, Perri MG. The role of self-monitoring in the maintenance of weight loss success. Eat Behav. 2016 Apr;21:193–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson A, Sainsburgy A. Strategies to improve adherence to dietary weight loss interventions in research and real-world settings. Behav Sci. 2017;7(4):44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Archer E, Hand GA, Blair SN. Validity of U.S. nutritional surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Caloric Energy Intake Data 1971–2010. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e76632.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garriguet D. Accounting for under-reporting when comparing energy intake across time in Canada. Health Rep. 2018;29(5):3–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian Health Survey: Users’ Guide 2011-13, 2014. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/B42F59546AB32C44CA257CD2001DF4CE?opendocument

  8. Tyrovolas S, Kovanagi A, Stickley A, et al. Weight perception, satisfaction, control, and low energy dietary reporting in the U.S. population: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2012. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(4):579–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orcholski L, Luke A, Plange-Rhule J, Bovet P, Forrester TE, Lambert EV, et al. Under-reporting of dietary energy intake in five populations of the African diaspora. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(3):464–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murakami K, Livingstone MDE, Okubo H, Sasaki S. Prevalence and characteristics of under-reporting of energy intake in Japanese adults: the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(2):441–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kye S, Kwon SO, Lee SY, Lee J, Kim BH, Suh HJ, et al. Under-reporting of energy intake from 24-hour dietary recalls in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2014;5(2):85–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Magalhaes V, Severo M, Torres D, et al. Characterizing energy intake under-reporting and its effects on intake estimations, in the Portuguese adult population. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(6):1031–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trijsburg L, Geelen A, Hollman PC, et al. BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to under-reporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(4):598–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kagawa M, Hills AP. Preoccupation with body weight and under-reporting of energy intake in female Japanese nutrition students. Nutrients. 2020;20:12(3).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moran LJ, McNaughton SA, Sui Z, et al. The characterization of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):204.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mullaney L, O’Higgins AC, Cawley S, et al. An estimation of periconceptual under-reporting of dietary energy intake. J Public Health (Oxf). 2015;37(4):728–36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maffeis C, Schutz Y, Fomari E, et al. Bias in food intake reporting in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: the role of body size, age, and gender. Pediatr Diabetes. 2017;18(3):213–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Murakami K, Livingstone MB. Prevalence and characteristics of under-reporting of energy intake in U.S. children and adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2012. Br J Nutr. 2016;15:294–304.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farajian P, Bountziouka V, Risvas G, Panagiotakos DB, Zampelas A. Anthropometric, lifestyle and parental characteristics associated with the prevalence of energy intake under-reporting in children: the GRECO (Greek childhood obesity) study. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(7):1120–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pfrimer K, Vilela M, Resende CM, Scagliusi FB, Marchini JS, Lima NKC, et al. Under-reporting of food intake and body fatness in independent older people: a doubly labelled water study. Age Ageing. 2015;44(1):103–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davison KM. Energy under-reporting in adults with mood disorders: prevalence and associated factors. Eat Weight Disord. 2013;18(3):323–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. •• Wehling H, Lusher J. People with a body mass index > 30 under-report their dietary intake: a systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2019;24(14):2042–59 This literature review summarizes the state of knowledge regarding underreporting of dietary intake, providing a broad overview of what is known about the obesity/underreporting link, the importance of considering intentionality, methodological issues in measuring dietary intake, potential factors that may mediate the obesity/underreporting link, and potential sources of bias, with a focus on applicability of information for clinicians and dietitians.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park Y, Dodd KW, Kipnis V, Thompson FE, Potischman N, Schoeller DA, et al. Comparison of self-reported dietary intake from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(1):80–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Murakami K, Livingstone MB, Sasaki S, et al. Ability of self-reported estimates of dietary sodium, potassium and protein to detect an association with general and abdominal obesity: comparison with the estimates derived from 24 h urinary excretion. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(8):1308–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Garden L, Clark H, Whybrow S, Stubbs RJ. Is misreporting of dietary intake by weighed food records or 24-hour recalls food specific? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jul;72(7):1026–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Suchanek P, Poledne R, Hubacek JA. Dietary intake reports fidelity—fact or fiction? Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32(Suppl 2):29–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Scagliusi FB, Polacow VO, Artioli GG, et al. Selective underreporting of energy intake in women: magnitude, determinants, and effect of training. Research. 2003;103(10):1306–13.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Poppitt SD, Swann D, Black AE, Prentice AM. Assessment of selective under-reporting of food intake by both obese and non-obese women in a metabolic facility. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998 Apr;22(4):303–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Muhlheim LS, Allison DB, Heshka S, Heymsfield SB. Do unsuccessful dieters intentionally underreport food intake? Int J Eat Disord. 1998;24(3):259–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Macdiarmid JI, Blundell JE. Assessing dietary intake: who, what and why of under-reporting. Nutr Res Rev. 1998;11:231–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. • Macdiarmid JI, Blundell JE. Dietary under-reporting: what people say about recording their food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51:199–200 Although this is an older study and only a short report, it provides a strong example of using qualitative methods to help explain quantitative research results and offers a model for future research to better understand the psychosocial mechanisms that underlie underreporting of dietary intake in obese populations.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Heitman BL, Lissner L. Dietary reporting by obese individuals—is it specific or non-specific? BMJ. 1995;311:986–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lissner L. New approaches to assessing diets of diverse populations: measuring food intake in studies of obesity. Pub Health Nutr. 2002;5(6A):889–92.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bathalon GP, Tucker KL, Hays NP, Vinken AG, Greenberg AS, McCrory MA, et al. Psychological measures of eating behavior and the accuracy of 3 common dietary assessment methods in healthy postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:739–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Maurer J, Taren DL, Teixeria PJ, et al. The psychosocial and behavioral characteristics related to energy under-reporting. Nutr Rev. 2006;64(2):53–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guan VX, Probst YC, Neale EP, et al. Predictors for under-reporting sodium and potassium intake by overweight and obese participants in a food-based clinical trial: implications for practice. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74(1):203–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tam KW, Veerman JL. Prevalence and characteristics of energy intake under-reporting among Australian adults in 1995 and 2011 to 2012. Nutr Diet. 2019;76(5):546–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Previdelli AN, Gomez G, Kovalskys I, et al. Prevalence and determinants of under-reporting of energy intake among Latin American populations: results from ELANS study. Nutr Res. 2019;68:9–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bel-Serrat S, Julian-Almarcegui C, Gonzalez-Gross, et al. Correlates of dietary energy under-reporting among European adolescents: the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA) study. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(8):1439–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. • Kirkpatrick SI, Gilsing AM, Hobin E, et al. Lessons learned from studies to evaluate an online 24-hour recall for use with children and adults in Canada. Nutrients. 2017;9(2):pii:E100 Summarizing studies testing the ASA24 Dietary Assessment tool across a range of subpopulations, the authors offer insight into challenges faced in applying technological innovation in an attempt to increase consistency and accuracy of dietary reporting and decrease underreporting. The study highlights key challenges and underscores the importance of tailoring resources to meet the needs and challenges of different populations.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kirkpatrick SI, Potischman N, Dodd KW, Douglass D, Zimmerman TP, Kahle LL, et al. The use of digital images in 24-hour recalls may lead to less misestimation of portion size compared with traditional interview-administered recalls. J Nutr. 2016;146(12):2567–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Meroni A, Jualim N, Fuller N. ‘Boden Food Plate’: novel interactive web-based method for the assessment of dietary intake. J Vis Exp. 2018;139.

  43. Fuller NR, Fong M, Gerofi J, Ferkh F, Leung C, Leung L, et al. Comparison of an electronic versus traditional food diary for assessing dietary intake—a validation study. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2017;11(6):647–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lafreniere J, Laramee C, Robitaille J, et al. Assessing the relative validity of a new, web-based, self-administered 24 h dietary recall in a French-Canadian population. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(15):2744–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Timon CM, Blain RJ, McNulty B, Kehoe L, Evans K, Walton J, et al. The development, validation, and user evaluation of Foodbook24; a web-based dietary assessment tool developed for the Irish adult population. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bell BM, Alam R, Alshurafa N, Thomaz E, Mondol AS, de la Haye K, et al. Automatic, wearable-based, in-field eating detection approaches for public health research: a scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jeong SA, Kim DW, Kim J, et al. Development of a smartphone application for dietary self-monitoring. Front Nutr. 2019;6:149.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bejar LM, Reyes OA, Garcia-Perea MD. Electronic 12-hour dietary recall (e-12HR): comparison of a mobile phone app for dietary intake assessment with a food frequency questionnaire and four dietary records. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(6):e10409.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mangieri CW, Johnson RJ, Sweeney LB, Choi YU, Wood JC. Mobile health applications enhance weight loss efficacy following bariatric surgery. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2019;13(2):176–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Linardon J, Messer M. My fitness pal usage in men: associations with eating disorder symptoms and psychosocial impairment. Eat Behav. 2019 Apr;33:13–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ipjian ML, Johnston CS. Smartphone technology facilitates dietary change in healthy adults. Nutrition. 2017;33:343–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Levison CA, Fewell L, Brosof LC. My fitness pal calorie tracker usage in the eating disorders. Eat Behav. 2017;27:14–6.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Simpson CC, Mazzeo S. Calorie counting and fitness tracking technologies: associations with eating disorder symptomatology. Eat Behav. 2017;26:89–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Patel ML, Hopkins CM, Brooks TL, Bennett GG. Comparing self-monitoring strategies for weight loss in a smartphone app: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(2):e12209.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Patel ML, Brooks TL, Bennett GG. Consistent self-monitoring in a commercial app-based intervention for weight loss: results from a randomized trial. J Behav Med. 2020;43(3):391–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. •• Regnier F, Chauvel L. Digital inequalities in the use of self-tracking diet and fitness apps: interview study on the influence of social, economic, and cultural factors. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(4):e101 Digital technologies have great potential to give individuals access to personalized health and wellness information and potentially remove barriers to dietary tracking that influence underreporting, but research has provided conflicting results regarding its influence on dietary behavior change or weight loss. This French study describes results of in-depth interviews with 79 individuals to better understand the use of these devices in daily life and the influence of socioeconomic status on usage, engagement, and outcomes.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Teixeira V, Voci SM, Mendes-Netto RS, da Silva DG. The relative validity of a food record using the smartphone application MyFitnessPal. Nutr Diet. 2018;75(2):219–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Griffiths C, Harnack L, Pereira MA. Assessment of the accuracy of nutrient calculations of five popular nutrition tracking applications. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(8):1495–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fallaize R, Zenun Franco R, Pasang J, Hwang F, Lovegrove JA. Popular nutrition-related mobile apps: an agreement assessment against a UK reference method. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(2):e9838.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen J, Berkman W, Bardouh M, Ng CYK, Allman-Farinelli M. The use of a food logging app in the naturalistic setting fails to provide accurate measurements of nutrients and poses usability challenges. Nutrition. 2019;57:208–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Jan;111(1):92–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. • Turner-McGrievy GM, Dunn CG, Wilcox S, et al. Defining adherence to mobile dietary self-monitoring and assessing tracking over time: tracking at least two eating occasions per day is best marker of adherence within two different mobile health randomized weight loss interventions. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(9):1516–152 The study provides important information regarding the “dose” of tracking that is most strongly associated with weight loss among obese individuals and provides practical, clinician-oriented advice regarding opportunities for early intervention to prevent the rapid decrease in self-monitoring rates seen in most studies.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Carter MC, Burley VJ, Cade JE. Weight loss associated with different patterns of self-monitoring using the mobile phone app My Meal Mate. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(2):e8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Peterson ND, Middleton KR, Nackers LM, Medina KE, Milsom VA, Perri MG. Dietary self-monitoring and long-term success with weight management. Obesity. 2014;22(9):1962–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Lerner Tower 1056 11100, Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Susan Connor

Authors
  1. Susan Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Connor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Obesity and Diet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Connor, S. Underreporting of Dietary Intake: Key Issues for Weight Management Clinicians. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 14, 16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-020-00652-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-020-00652-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation