Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping Potential Wilderness in China with Location-based Services Data

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wilderness mapping can provide valuable information for natural resource management. In this article, a novel, straightforward approach has been developed to identify wilderness areas in China using emerging new data. Tencent LBS (location based service) data that reflect human activities are used as a basis for mapping wilderness characteristics for the whole of China while admitting non-human-activity zones as “observed” wilderness, rather than “estimated/inferred” wilderness using spatial factors based on conventional wilderness mapping approaches using GIS. The mapping results using new data are compared and integrated with the results from the MCE approach. The wilderness map, delineating the range of wilderness across the whole of China, could be used in landscape planning to protect the remaining natural resources and evaluate existing spatial ecological protection schemes. With increasingly available new data, the proposed approach can be applied for mapping wilderness at other spatial scales and in other geographical areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkemade, R., van Oorschot, M., Miles, L., Nellemann, C., Bakkenes, M., & ten Brink, B. (2009). GLOBIO3: A framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems, 12(3), 374–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aplet, G., Thomson, J. and Wilbert, M. (2000). Indicators of wildness: Using attributes of the land to assess the context of wilderness. Vol. RMRS-P-15, 89–98.

  • Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2012). Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS(PPGIS). Applied Geography, 34, 316–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y, Yang, R, Long, Y., Carver, S (2018) A preliminary study on mapping wilderness in mainland China. International Journal of Wilderness, 24(2). ISSN 1086-5519.

  • Carver, S. (1991). Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5(3), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S. (1996). Mapping the wilderness continuum using raster GIS. Raster imagery in geographic information systems. OnWord press, New Mexico, 4, 283–288.

  • Carver, S., & Fritz, S. (2016). Mapping wilderness: Concepts, Techniques and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S. and Wrightham, M. (2003). Assessment of historic trends in the extent of wild land in Scotland: A pilot study: Scottish Natural Heritage.

  • Carver, S., Comber, A., McMorran, R., & Nutter, S. (2012). A GIS model for mapping spatial patterns and distribution of wild land in Scotland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(3), 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, S., Tricker, J., & Landres, P. (2013). Keeping it wild: Mapping wilderness character in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 131, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, S. A., Martin, V. G., Watson, A., Stringer, A., & Kormos, C. F. (2016). Wilderness protected areas: Management guidelines for IUCN category 1b protected areas. Gland: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, A., Carver, S., Fritz, S., McMorran, R., Washtell, J., & Fisher, P. (2010). Different methods, different wilds: Evaluating alternative mappings of wildness using fuzzy MCE and Dempster-Shafer MCE. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(2), 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronon, W. (1998). The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature (pp. 69–90). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C. P. and Hendee, J. C. (2002). Wilderness management: Stewardship and protection of resources and values: Fulcrum Pub, 2002(4), 469–470.

  • Fritz, S., Carver, S., See, L., Mccool, S. F., Cole, D. N., and Borrie, W. T., et al. (2000). New gis approaches to wild land mapping in europe. Proceedings - Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 120–127.

  • Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., Grillmayer, R., Achard, F., Kraxner, F., & Obersteiner, M. (2009). GeoWiki.Org: The use of crowd sourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sensing, 1, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., See, L., Schepaschenko, D., van der Velde, M., Kraxner, F., & Obersteiner, M. (2012). Geo-wiki: An online platform for improving global land cover. Environmental Modelling and Software, 31, 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habron, D. (1998). Visual perception of wild land in Scotland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, B. D. (2016). Visualising Space of Global Inaccessibility, Mapping Wilderness. Concepts, Techniques and Applications (pp. 102–116). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Walters, L., & Čivić, K. (2010). Wilderness and biodiversity. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(4), 338–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliskey, A. D. (1994). A comparative analysis of approaches to wilderness perception mapping. Journal of Environmental Management, 41(3), 199–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliskey, A. D. (1998). Linking the wilderness perception mapping concept to the recreation opportunity spectrum. Environmental Management, 22(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiters A.T., Kun Z., McIntosh N., Poirters C., van Apeldoorn R.C. and Vancura V. (2013). Guidelines for the management of wilderness and wild areas in Natura 2000, European Commission, available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/wilderness/. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.

  • Lesslie, R. G. (1998). Global wilderness. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC. Dataset derived using the Digital Chart of the World 1993 version and methods based on the Australian National Wilderness Inventory. http://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/global-wilderness. Accessed 30 Dec 2015.

  • Lesslie, R. G. (2016). The Wilderness Continuum Concept and Its Application in Australia: Lessons for Modern Conservation. Mapping Wilderness: Concepts, Techniques and Application. Dordrecht: Springer, 177–189.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lesslie, R. G., & Taylor, S. (1985). The wilderness continuum concept and its implications for Australian wilderness preservation policy. Biological Conservation, 32(4), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H., & Dearden, P. (2005). Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environmental Conservation, 32(01), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, F., Coghill, G. M., & Lusseau, D. (2018). Using social media to quantify spatial and temporal dynamics of nature-based recreational activities. PLoS One, 13(7), e0200565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Măntoiu, D. Ş., Nistorescu, M. C., Şandric, I. C., Mirea, I. C., Hăgătiş, A., & Stanciu, E. (2016). Wilderness Areas in Romania: A Case Study on the South Western Carpathians, Mapping Wilderness. Concepts, Techniques and Applications (pp. 145–156). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, J. M., & Spalding, H. (1989). A reconnaissance-level inventory of the amount of wilderness remaining in the world. Ambio, 221–227.

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Thomsen, J. B., Da Fonseca, G. A., & Olivieri, S. (1998). Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: Approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conservation Biology, 12(3), 516–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, L. (1983). Wilderness recreation in New Zealand. Paper presented at the proceedings of the FMC 50th jubilee conference on wilderness. Federated Mountain clubs of NZ (Inc).

  • Müller, A., Bøcher, P. K., & Svenning, J. C. (2015). Where are the wilder parts of anthropogenic landscapes? A mapping case study for Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning, 144, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. (1967). Wilderness and the American mind. CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ÓlafsdÓttir, R., & Runnström, M. (2011). How wild is Iceland? Wilderness quality with respect to nature-based tourism. Tourism Geographies, 13(2), 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ÓlafsdÓttir, R., Sæþórsdóttirand, A. D., & Runnström, M. (2016). Purism Scale Approach for Wilderness Mapping in Iceland. Mapping Wilderness. Concepts, Techniques and Applications (pp. 157–176). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsi, F., & Geneletti, D. (2013). Using geotagged photographs and gis analysis to estimate visitor flows in natural areas. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21(5), 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsi, F., Geneletti, D., & Borsdorf, A. (2013). Mapping wildness for protected area management: A methodological approach and application to the Dolomites UNESCO world heritage site (Italy). Landscape and Urban Planning, 120, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plutzar, C., Enzenhofer, K., Hoser, F., Zika, M., & Kohler, B. (2016). Is there something wild in Austria? In S. J. Carver & S. Fritz (Eds.), Mapping wilderness: Concepts, techniques and application (pp. 177–189). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, E. W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M. A., Redford, K. H., Wannebo, A. V., & Woolmer, G. (2002). The human footprint and the last of the wild: The human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. BioScience, 52(10), 891–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, N. (2016). Wild vistas: Progress in computational approaches to “viewshed” analysis. Mapping wilderness. Concepts, techniques and applications (pp. 69–87). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • See, L., Fritz, S., Perger, C., Schill, C., Albrecht, F., McCallum, I., Schepaschenko, D., Van der Velde, M., Kraxner, F., Baruah, U. D., Saikia, A., Singh, K., de Miguel, S., Hazarika, R., Sarkar, A., Marcarini, A. A., Baruah, M., Sahariah, D., Changkakati, T., & Obersteiner, M. (2014). Mapping human impact using crowdsourcing. Mapping wilderness. Concepts, techniques and applications (pp. 89–102). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G.H., and Schreyer, R. (1987). Attitudes toward wilderness and factors affecting visitor behaviour: A state-of-knowledge review. General Technical Report, Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, No. INT-220, 246–293.

  • Tricker, J. & Landres, P. (2012). Mapping wilderness character in Death Valley National Park. National Resource Stewardship and Science, 82.

  • Tuan, Y. F. (1990). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W. R., Brandon, K., Brooks, T. M., Costanza, R., Da Fonseca, G. A., & Portela, R. (2007). Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience, 57(10), 868–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walden-Schreiner, C., Rossi, S. D., Barros, A., Pickering, C., and Leung, Y. F. (2018). Using crowd-sourced photos to assess seasonal patterns of visitor use in mountain-protected areas. Ambio, 1–13.

  • Wild Europe (2013) A working definition of European wilderness and wild areas. http://www.wildeurope.org/images/pdf/a-working-definition-of-european-wilderness-and-wild-areas.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2014.

  • Wilderness Act of 1964, Pub.L. No. 88–577, 78 Stat. 890 (1964).

  • Worboys, G., Francis, W. L., & Lockwood, M. (Eds.). (2010). Connectivity conservation management: A global guide (with particular reference to mountain connectivity conservation). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S., Galt, R. E., & Buck, M. V. (2004). Globalization and multi-spatial trends in the coverage of protected-area conservation (1980–2000). Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 33(8), 520–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778319), the National Water Pollution Control and Treatment Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2017ZX07103-002) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (NO. 2018M631476).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Long.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Map potential wilderness characteristics for the whole of China using Tencent LBS (location based service) big data that reflects individual level human mobility activity by recognizing that areas with no human mobility activity are “observed” wilderness

• Compare wilderness mapping by using new data compared with mapping by using a conventional approach with GIS

• Support landscape planning to retain nature reserves, evaluate the protection of existing ecological protection areas.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 3 The wilderness ratio in provincial administrative regions (excluding Macao)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, S., Long, Y. Mapping Potential Wilderness in China with Location-based Services Data. Appl. Spatial Analysis 13, 69–89 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-019-09295-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-019-09295-6

Keywords

Navigation