Skip to main content
Log in

Human disturbances on landscapes in protected areas: a case study of the Wolong Nature Reserve

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Human-induced ecological degradation in protected areas is of great concern in landscape ecological studies. Using Landsat TM data and GIS-based spatial analysis, we assessed the impacts of human disturbances on landscape structure in the Wolong Nature Reserve in southwestern China. Buffer zone and landscape dissimilarity analysis were used to examine the scope of three types of human-induced disturbances—construction of hydropower stations, human activities around settlement, and human activities along roads. We found that the impacts of these human disturbances extend to a threshold distance of about 1,000 m from the sources of disturbance. The intensity of the impact of human disturbances on landscape structure exhibited clear distance–decay effects. The first 200 m buffer zone is the area where human activities have inflicted the most visible changes, with a decrease of forest cover by 15–40% and an increase of shrub and barren land area by 15–50%. The relative intensity of the overall impact on landscape structure was highest around hydropower stations, second around human settlements, and lowest along roads. Overtime, however, the relative level of impact associated with construction of hydropower stations will likely decrease and that associated with human activities around settlements likely increase. Our case study of Wolong exposes hurdles that habitat preservation must cross in protected areas. Future management of Wolong Nature Reserve should focus on adoption of effective policies to further constrain human activities in the reserve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andren H (1994) Effect of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscape with different proportions of suitable habitat. Okois 71:355–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff S (1989) Geographic information systems: a management perspective. WDL, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon K, Redford KH, Sanderson SE (eds) (1998) Parks in peril: people, politics, and protected areas. Island, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks T, Bruner AG, Brunner J, Gustavo AB, Fonseca DA, Liu R, Sung W, Yan X, Baragona K, Liu J, Linderman M, Ouyang Z, Li A (2001) The pandas’ habitat at Wolong nature reserve. Science 293:603–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca Gustavo AB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LD, Liu XH, Fu BJ (1999) Evaluation on giant panda habitat fragmentation in Wolong natural reserve (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Ecol Sin 19:291–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Dompka V (ed) (1996) Human population, biodiversity and protected areas: science and policy issues. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (1995) The scale of human enterprise and biodiversity loss. In: Lawton JH, May RM (eds) Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 214–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forester DJ, Machlis GE (1996) Modeling human factors that affect the loss of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 10:1253–1263

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire KB, Pimbert MP (eds) (1997) Social change and conservation: environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie A (2000) The human impact on the natural environment. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking M, Stolton S, Dudley N (2000) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management of protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available online at http://wcpa.iucn.org/pubs/pdfs/Evaluating_Effect.pdf. (accessed 15 April 2003)

  • Homewood K, Lambin EF, Coast E, Kariuki A, Kikula I, Kivelia J, Said M, Serneels S, Thompson M (1998) Long-term changes in Serengeti-Mara wildebeest and land cover: pastoralism, population, or policies? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12544–12549

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (1998) United Nations list of protected areas. World Conservation Monitoring Centre and IUCN Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

  • James AN, Green MJB, Paine JR (1999) Global review of protected area budgets and staff. WCMC, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Liu JG, Ouyang ZY, Linderman M, Zhou SQ, Zhang HM (2001) Simulating demographic and socioeconomic processes on household level and implications for giant panda habitats. Ecol Model 140:31–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Li A, Lupi F, Liu JG, Linderman MA, Huang JY (2002) Modeling the choice to switch from fuelwood to electricity: implications for giant panda habitat conservation. Ecol Econ 42:445–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Ouyang Z, Taylor WW, Group R, Tan Y, Zhang H (1999) A framework for evaluating the effects of human factors on wildlife habitat: the case of Giant Pandas. Conserv Biol 13:1360–1370

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Linderman M, Ouyang ZY, Li A (2001) Ecological degradation in protected area: the case of Wolong Natural Reserve for Giant Pandas. Science 292:98–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Luck GW (2003) Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature 421:530–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks CJ, Lü Z, Dinerstein E, Wang H, Olson DM, Zhu C, Wang D (2001) Ecology: giant pandas in a changing landscape. Science 294:1465

    Google Scholar 

  • Lü YH, Chen LD, Fu BJ, Liu SL (2003) A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas: the case of Wolong Biosphere Reserve. Landscape Urban Plann 63:213–223

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon J, DeWulf R (1994) Designing protected areas for the giant pandas in China. In: Miller RI (ed) Mapping the diversity of nature. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 142–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Rao KS, Chandrasekhar K, Gavali R, Saxena KG (2000) Analysis and resolution of protected area—people conflicts in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Environ Conserv 27:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA, Gadgil M, Leveque C, Padoch C, Redford K (1995) Human influences on biodiversity and protected areas. In: Heywood VH (ed) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 711–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Z, Liu J, Zhang H (2000) Community structure analysis of giant panda habitat in Wolong (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Ecol Sin 20:458–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Lawton JH (1998) Planning for biodiversity. Science 279:2068–2069

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB (2000) A primer of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin ZS, Allen T (1993) The bamboo and forest dynamic succession of the ecological environment for Giant Pandas in Wolong (in Chinese). Forestry, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Samant SS, Dhar U, Rawal RS (2000) Assessment of fuel resource diversity and utilization patterns in Askot Wildlife Sanctuary in Kumaun Himalaya, India for conservation and management. Environ Conserv 27:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller GB, Hu J, Pan W, Zhu J (1985) The Giant Pandas of Wolong. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR, White AM, Zhou XP, Zhang HM, Zhang GQ, Wei RP, Hare VJ, Tepper EM, Lindburg DG (2001) A quantitative assessment of the efficacy of an environmental enrichment program for giant pandas. Anim Behav 61:447–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenner E (1996) Why things bite back: technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Trakolis D (2001) Local people’s perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes national park, Greece. Environ Manage 61:227–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF, Mathews JT, Meyer WB (eds) (1990) The earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay JK, Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca Gustavo AB (2001) The effectiveness of parks. Science 293:1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RG (ed) (1996) National parks and protected areas: their role in environmental protection. Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng H, Wu XB (2004) Utilities of edge-based metrics for studying landscape fragmentation. Comput, Environ Urban Syst 29:159–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZJ, Hu JC (2000) A study on giant panda’s habitat selection (in Chinese with English abstract). J Sichuan Normal Univ 21:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HM, Wang PY, Zhang GQ, Wei RP (2000) Advances in conservation and research technology for captive and wild pandas of Wolong (in Chinese with English abstract). Sichuan J Zool 19:35–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the constructive comments made by three anonymous reviewers, which have significantly improved the quality of this paper. This study is partially funded by the National Basic Science and Technology Planning Project (G2000046807) sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology, and the National Natural Science Foundation, People’s Republic of China (40171091). Ningning Kong and Shujuan Li were two key graduate assistants for this project. We would like to express our sincere thanks to Ouyang Zhiyun, Research Fellow of Ecological Environment Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for providing the DEM and data on locations of human activities. We also like to thank Dr. Ma Keming, Dr. Chen Liding, and Ms. Gao Lingyun for their help in the field survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Z. Sui.

About this article

Cite this article

Zeng, H., Sui, D.Z. & Wu, X.B. Human disturbances on landscapes in protected areas: a case study of the Wolong Nature Reserve. Ecol Res 20, 487–496 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-005-0065-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-005-0065-6

Keywords

Navigation