Abstract
Sunspot number series are subject to various uncertainties that are still poorly known. The need to understand these better was recently highlighted by the major revision of the international Sunspot Number (Clette et al., in Space Sci. Rev. 186, 35, 2014). We present the first thorough estimation of these uncertainties, which behave as Poisson-like random variables with a multiplicative coefficient that is time- and observatory-dependent. We provide a simple expression for these uncertainties, and reveal how their evolution in time coincides with changes in the observations and processing of the data. Knowing their value is essential for properly building composites out of multiple observations, and for preserving the stability of the composites in time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the following, “sunspot number” will designate the sunspot number in a generic way, whereas “Wolf number” will refer to the relative sunspot number \([N_{\mathrm{W}}]\) from specific stations, and “international Sunspot Number” will be used for the composite \(S_{\mathrm{N}}\) from SILSO.
References
Allen, E.J., Huff, C.: 2010, Derivation of stochastic differential equations for sunspot activity. Astron. Astrophys. 516, A114. DOI .
Anscombe, F.J.: 1948, The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data. Biometrika 35(3/4), 246.
Arlt, R.: 2008, Digitization of sunspot drawings by Staudacher in 1749 – 1796. Solar Phys. 247, 399. DOI .
Bartlett, M.S.: 1947, The use of transformations. Biometrics 3(1), 39.
Bray, R.J., Loughhead, R.E.: 1964, Sunspots, Chapman & Hall, London.
Chatfield, C.: 2003, The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction, 6th edn. CRC Press, London.
Clette, F., Berghmans, D., Vanlommel, P., Van der Linden, R.A.M., Koeckelenbergh, A., Wauters, L.: 2007, From the Wolf number to the International Sunspot Index: 25 years of SIDC. Adv. Space Res. 40, 919. DOI .
Clette, F., Svalgaard, L., Vaquero, J.M., Cliver, E.W.: 2014, Revisiting the Sunspot Number. Space Sci. Rev. 186(1 – 4), 35. DOI .
Clette, F., Lefèvre, L., Cagnotti, M., Cortesi, S., Bulling, A.: 2016, The revised Brussels–Locarno Sunspot Number (1981 – 2015). Solar Phys. DOI
Cliver, E.W.: 2016, The Discontinuity in 1885 in the Group Sunspot Number. Solar Phys. DOI
Davis, R.A., Dunsmuir, W.T.M., Wang, Y.: 1999, Modeling Time Series of Count Data, Statistics Textbooks and Monographs 158, Dekker, New York, 63.
Donoho, D., Johnstone, I., Johnstone, I.M.: 1993, Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81, 425.
Dudok de Wit, T.: 2011, A method for filling gaps in solar irradiance and solar proxy data. Astron. Astrophys. 533, A29. DOI .
Dudok de Wit, T., Kopp, G., Fröhlich, C., Schöll, M.: 2016, Methodology to create a new total solar irradiance record: making a composite out of multiple data records. Geophys. Res. Lett., submitted.
Friedli, T.K.: 2016, The construction of the Wolf series from 1749 to 1980. Solar Phys., submitted.
Fröhlich, C.: 2016, Determination of time-dependent uncertainty of the total solar irradiance records 1978 to present. Space Weather Space Clim. 6, A18. DOI .
Golub, G.H., van Loan, C.F.: 1980, An analysis of the total least squares problem. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 17, 883. DOI .
Howard, R.F.: 1992, The growth and decay of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 137, 51. DOI .
Hoyt, D.V., Schatten, K.H.: 1998, Group Sunspot Numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction. Solar Phys. 181, 491. DOI .
Lepreti, F., Fanello, P.C., Zaccaro, F., Carbone, V.: 2000, Persistence of solar activity on small scales: Hurst analysis of time series coming from H\(\upalpha\) flares. Solar Phys. 197, 149. DOI .
Letellier, C., Aguirre, L.A., Maquet, J., Gilmore, R.: 2006, Evidence for low dimensional chaos in sunspot cycles. Astron. Astrophys. 449, 379. DOI .
Ljung, L.: 1997, System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Lockwood, M., Owens, M.J., Barnard, L.A., Usoskin, I.G.: 2016a, An assessment of sunspot number data composites over 1845 – 2014. Astrophys. J., accepted.
Lockwood, M., Owens, M.J., Barnard, L., Usoskin, I.G.: 2016b, Tests of sunspot number sequences: 3. Effects of regression procedures on the calibration of historic sunspot data. Solar Phys. DOI .
Mäkitalo, M., Foi, A.: 2012, Poisson–Gaussian denoising using the exact unbiased inverse of the generalized Anscombe transformation. In: Proc. 2012 IEEE Internat. Conf. Acoustics, Speech Signal Proc. (ICASSP) 20, 1081. DOI .
Mann, M.E., Lee, J.M.: 1996, Robust estimation of background noise and signal detection in climatic time series. Clim. Change 33(3), 409. DOI .
Morfill, G.E., Scheingraber, H., Voges, W., Sonett, C.P.: 1991, Sunspot number variations – stochastic or chaotic. In: Sonett, C.P., Giampapa, M.S., Matthews, M.S. (eds.) The Sun in Time, 30, Springer, New York.
Noble, P.L., Wheatland, M.S.: 2011, Modeling the sunspot number distribution with a Fokker–Planck equation. Astrophys. J. 732, 5. DOI .
Noble, P.L., Wheatland, M.S.: 2013, Origin and use of the Laplace distribution in daily sunspot numbers. Solar Phys. 282(2), 565. DOI .
Ogden, R.T.: 1996, Essential Wavelets for Statistical Applications, Academic Press, Basel. 3764338644.
Pop, M.-I.: 2011, Distribution of the daily Sunspot Number variation for the last 14 solar cycles. Solar Phys. 276(1 – 2), 351. DOI .
Press, W.H., Rybicki, G.B.: 1989, Fast algorithm for spectral analysis of unevenly sampled data. Astrophys. J. 338, 277. DOI .
Schaffrin, B., Wieser, A.: 2008, On weighted total least-squares adjustment for linear regression. J. Geod. 82, 415. DOI .
Schneider, T.: 2001, Analysis of incomplete climate data: estimation of mean values and covariance matrices and imputation of missing values. J. Climate 14, 853. DOI .
Schulz, M., Mudelsee, M.: 2002, REDFIT: estimating red-noise spectra directly from unevenly spaced paleoclimatic time series. Comput. Geosci. 28, 421. DOI .
Sornette, D.: 2004, Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences : Chaos, Fractals Self-organization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools, 2nd edn., Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, Heidelberg.
Svalgaard, L.: 2013, Solar activity – past, present, future. Space Weather Space Clim. 3(27), A24. DOI .
Svalgaard, L., Schatten, K.H.: 2016, Reconstruction of the Sunspot Group Number: the Backbone method. Solar Phys. DOI
Taylor, B.N., Kuyatt, C.E.: 1994, Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. Technical report 1297, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC.
Usoskin, I.G., Mursula, K., Kovaltsov, G.A.: 2003, Reconstruction of monthly and yearly group sunspot numbers from sparse daily observations. Solar Phys. 218, 295. DOI .
Vaquero, J.M.: 2007, Historical sunspot observations: a review. Adv. Space Res. 40, 929. DOI .
Vaquero, J.M., Vázquez, M.: 2009, The Sun Recorded Through History: Scientific Data Extracted from Historical Documents, Astrophysics and Space Science Library 361, Springer, Heidelberg.
Vigouroux, A., Delache, P.: 1994, Sunspot numbers uncertainties and parametric representations of solar activity variations. Solar Phys. 152, 267. DOI .
Wang, Y.-M., Lean, J.L., Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 2005, Modeling the Sun’s magnetic field and irradiance since 1713. Astrophys. J. 625, 522. DOI .
Wolf, R.: 1850, Mitteilungen über die Sonnenflecken III. Astron. Mitt. Eidgenöss. Sternwarte Zür. 1, 27.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7, 2012) under grant agreement no 313188 (SOLID, projects.pmodwrc.ch/solid ). We sincerely thank the anonymous referee for carefully reviewing the manuscript, and for making pertinent comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Sunspot Number Recalibration
Guest Editors: F. Clette, E.W. Cliver, L. Lefèvre, J.M. Vaquero, and L. Svalgaard
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dudok de Wit, T., Lefèvre, L. & Clette, F. Uncertainties in the Sunspot Numbers: Estimation and Implications. Sol Phys 291, 2709–2731 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0970-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0970-6