Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evolutionary Neuroandrogenic Theory and Universal Gender Differences in Cognition and Behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A theory is proposed that predicts the existence of numerous gender differences in cognition and behavior. The basis for these expectations is the single assumption that females have evolved tendencies to form long term sociosexual alliances with a competent resource provisioner. This assumption is teamed with evidence that males are actually a variant on the female sex with brains masculinized in ways that help them respond to female mating preferences. To orchestrate male responses to female biases in mates, the theory asserts that androgens (male sex hormones) have two main effects on human brain functioning. One is a diminished sensitivity to most environmental stimuli. The other involves shifting cognitive functioning away from the left hemisphere toward a more even and task-specialized hemispheric distribution. Many of the cognitive and behavioral differences between males and females predicted by the theory are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. S. (1947). Some aspects of sex differences in relation to marketing. Journal of Marketing, 12, 158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D. (1990). Sex, gender, and the individual. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 486–526). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azim, E., Mobbs, D., Jo, B., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2005). Sex differences in brain activation elicited by humor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16496–16501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev, A. V. (2002). Growing apart: An ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsamo, L. M., Xu, B., Grandin, C. B., Petrella, J. R., Braniecki, S. H., Elliott, T. K., et al. (2002). A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of left hemisphere language dominance in children. Archives of Neurology, 59, 1168–1174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Hampson, E., Berkley, K. J., Geary, N., & Herman, J. (2007). Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, M., Friedman, R. B., Grafman, J., Perez, E., Diamond, S., & Lindsay, M. B. (1994). Summation priming and course semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bench, C. J., Friston, K. J., Brown, R. G., Scott, L. C., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Dolan, R. J. (1992). The anatomy of melancholia: Focal abnormalities of cerebral blood flow in major depression. Psychological Medicine, 22, 607–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bendelow, G. (2000). Pain and gender. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1981). The good provider role: Its rise and fall. The American Psychologist, 36, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijur, P. E., Stewart-Brown, S., & Butler, N. (1986). Child behavior and accidental injury in 11, 966 preschool children. American Journal of Disabled Children, 140, 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Kipp, K. (1996). Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 163–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, R. E., & Zhang, Y. (1997). Conduct disorder and HIV risk behaviors among runaway and homeless adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 48, 69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., et al. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117, 1241–1253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breedlove, S. M., Cooke, B. M., & Jordoan, C. L. (1999). The orthodox view of brain sexual differentiation. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 54, 8–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, R. (2002). The genetics and biology of true love: Prosocial biological affects and the left hemisphere. Psychological Review, 109, 739–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne, P. S. (1988). Role of mammalian Y chromosome in sex determination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 322, 63–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2007). The evolution of human mating. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 502–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: A evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canli, T., Desmond, J., Zhao, Z., Glover, G., & Gabrieli, J. (1998). Hemispheric asymmetry for emotional stimuli detected with fMRI. NeuroReport, 9, 3233–3239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carruth, L. L., Reisert, I., & Arnold, A. P. (2002). Sex chromosome genes directly affect brain sexual differentiation. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 933–934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. (1996). Women’s mating strategies. Evolutionary Anthropology, 5, 124–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello, C. (1998). On codes of meaning and the meaning of codes: Semantic access and retrieval within and between hemispheres. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspective from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 141–160). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiron, C., Jambaque, I., Nabbout, R., Lounes, R., Syrota, A., & Dulac, O. (1997). The right brain hemisphere is dominant in human infants. Brain, 120, 1057–1065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Bendahan, C. C. C., Buitelaar, J. K., van Goozen, S. H. M., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2004). Prenatal exposure to testosterone and functional cerebral lateralization: A study in same-sex and opposite-sex twin girls. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 911–916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coney, J., & Evans, K. D. (1999). Hemispheric asymmetries in the resolution of lexical ambiguity. Neuropsychologia, 38, 272–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D. A., DeFiore, J. M., Hermsen, J. M., Kowalewski, B. M., & Vanneman, R. (1995). Occupational gender desegregation in the 1980s. Work and Occupations, 22, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, S., & Wu, Y. C. (2005). Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 494–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Kaufman, M. R. (2006). Sex differences versus social processes in the construction of gender. In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Hargrove, M. F. (1997). Age, testosterone, and behavior among female prison inmates. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 477–480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbs, J. M., Riad, J. K., & Chance, S. E. (2001). Testosterone and ruthless homicide. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W., & Wilkinson, L. S. (2006). It is not all hormones: Alternative explanations for sex differentiation of the brain. Brain Research, 1126, 36–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J., Abercrombiea, H., Nitschkea, J. B., & Putnam, K. (1999). Regional brain function, emotion and disorders of emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 228–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, C. (2004). Brain development: The most important sexual organ. Nature, 427, 390–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doktor, R., & Bloom, D. M. (1977). Selective lateralization of cognitive style related to occupation as determined by EEG alpha asymmetry. Psychophysiology, 14, 385–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social role. The American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (1991). A synthesized (biosocial) theory of rape. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 631–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (2001). The biosocial female choice theory of social stratification. Social Biology, 48, 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (2004). Sex, status, and criminality: A theoretical nexus. Social Biology, 51, 144–160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (2005). A theory explaining biological correlates of criminality. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 287–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (2006). Gender differences in smiling: An evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory. Physiology & Behavior, 88, 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., Beaver, K., & Wright, J. (2009). Handbook of crime correlates. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., Das, S., & Buker, H. (2007). Androgen-promoted physiological traits and criminality: A test of the evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., & Das, S. (2010). The factorial structure of self-reported androgen-promoted physiological traits. Natural Science, 2, 1164–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L., Hershberger, S., Field, E., Wersinger, S., Pellis, S., Geary, D., et al. (2008). Sex differences: Summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillingim, R. B., & Maixner, W. (1996). The influence of resting blood pressure and gender on pain responses. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58, 326–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Findgold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual ability: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62, 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivush, R., Brotman, M., Buckner, J., & Goodman, S. (2000). Gender differences in parent–child emotion narratives. Sex Roles, 42, 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fivush, R., Haden, C. A., & Reese, E. (2006). Elaborating on elaborations: Role of maternal reminiscingstyle on cognitive and socioemotional development. Child Development, 77, 1568–1588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forest, G., & Godbout, R. (2000). Effects of sleep deprivation on performance and EEG spectral analysis in young adults. Brain and Cognition, 43, 195–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. A., & Davidson, R. J. (1987). Electroencephalogram asymmetry in response to the approach of a stranger and maternal separation in 10-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. A., Rubin, K. H., Calkins, S. D., Marshall, T. R., Coplan, R. J., Porges, S. W., et al. (1995). Frontal activation: Asymmetry and social competence at four years of age. Child Development, 66, 1770–1784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Geary, D. C., Vigil, J., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2004). Evolution of human mate choice. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geier, D. A., & Geier, M. R. (2006). A clinical and laboratory evaluation of methionine cycle-transsulfuration and androgen pathway markers in children with autistic disorders. Hormone Research, 66, 182–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • George, D. T., Umhau, J. C., Phillips, M. J., Emmela, D., Ragan, P. W., Shoaf, S. E., et al. (2001). Serotonin, testosterone and alcohol in the etiology of domestic violence. Psychiatry Research, 104, 27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, P. N., & Lovell-Badge, R. (1993). SRY and sex determination in mammals. Annual Review of Genetics, 27, 71–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, N., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2010). Preschoolers’ mental rotation: Sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1244–1250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hankin, B. L., & Abramson, L. Y. (2001). Development of gender differences in depression: An elaborated cognitive vulnerability-transactional stress theory. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 773–796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harpending, H., & Cochran, G. (2002). In our genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 10–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, C., & Widiger, T. (1998). Gender differences in the diagnosis of mental disorders: Conclusions and controversies of the DSM-IV. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 260–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauspie, R. C., Das, S. R., Preece, M. A., & Tanner, J. M. (1980). A longitudinal study of the growth in height of boys and girls of West Bengal (India) aged six months to 20 years. Annals of Human Biology, 7, 429–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort, M., Stowe, L., Wijers, B., & Paans, A. (1999). Familial handedness and sex in language comprehension. Neuroimage, 9, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, W. R., & McGuire, K. R. (2003). The ascendance of hunting during the California middle archaic: An evolutionary perspective. American Antiquity, 67, 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, K., Lauritsen, J. L., & Lynch, J. P. (2009). The national crime victimization survey and the gender gap in offending: Redux. Criminology, 47, 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetrick, W. P., Sandman, C. A., Bunney, W. E., Jin, Y., Potkin, S. G., & White, M. H. (1996). Gender differences in gating of the auditory evoked potential in normal subjects. Biological Psychiatry, 39, 51–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, L. T., Zheng, M., Liu, Y., & Sun, C. H. (2002). Attitudes to marriage and sexual behaviors: A survey of gender and culture differences in China and United Kingdom. Sex Roles, 46, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husain, A., & Firdous, J. (1990). Physical factors of mate selection: Testing assortative mating theory. Psychologia, 33, 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R. A., Reynolds, J. D., & Deutsch, J. C. (1996). Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution, 50, 1382–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karkanaki, A., Praras, N., Katsikis, I., Kita, M., & Panidis, D. (2007). Is the Y chromosome all that is required for sex determination? Hippokratia, 11, 120–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl, K., Smith, A., Mendrek, A., Forster, B., Hare, R., & Liddle, P. (2004). Temporal lobe abnormalities in semantic processing by criminal psychopaths revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 130, 297–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D., & Hampson, E. (1994). Cognitive pattern in men and women is influenced by fluctuations in sex hormones of special interest. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinomura, S., Larsson, J., Gulyas, B., & Roland, P. E. (1996). Activation by attention of the human reticular formation and thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Science, 271, 512–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, D. J., & Fisher, M. L. (2005). Males identify and respond adaptively to the mating strategies of other men. Sexualities, Evolution and Gender, 7, 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFreniere, P., & Dumas, J. (1996). Social competence and behavior evaluation in children ages 3 to 6 years: The short form (SCBE-30). Psychological Assessment, 8, 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiere, M., Harris, G., & Quinsey, V. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity for sexual aggression. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leonhard, D., & Brugger, P. (1998). Creative, paranormal, and delusional thought: A consequence of right hemisphere semantic activation? Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 11, 177–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, I. M., Mena, I., Boone, K. B., Miller, B. L., Mehringer, C. M., & Wohl, M. (1994). Reduction of cerebral blood flow in older depressed patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 677–686.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liotti, M., & Mayberg, H. S. (2001). The role of functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology of depression. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 121–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (2005). Sexual orientation and personality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 119–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, I., Ramos, J., Arce, C., Guevara, M. A., & Corsi-Cabrera, M. (1995). Effect of total sleep deprivation on reaction time and waking EEG activity in man. Sleep, 18, 346–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., Ivanec, D., & Zarevaki, P. (2009). Sex differences in general knowledge domains. Collegium Anthropologicum, 33, 515–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1966). A social-learning view of sex differences in behavior. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences (pp. 56–69). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. L. C., & Crow, T. J. (2005). Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: the forgotten hemisphere? Brain, 128, 963–978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morais da Silva, S., Hacker, A., Harley, V., Goodfellow, P., Swain, A., & Lovell-Badge, R. (1996). Sox9 expression during gonadal development implies a conserved role for the gene in testis differentiation in mammals and birds. Nature Genetics, 14, 62–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgane, P. J., Galler, J. R., & Mokler, D. J. (2005). A review of systems and networks of the limbic forebrain/limbic midbrain. Progress in Neurobiology, 75, 143–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. A., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2004). Sexual differentiation of the vertebrate nervous system. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1034–1039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscicki, E. K. (1997). Identification of suicide risk factors using epidemiologic studies. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 20, 499–517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., Hunkin, J., & Spector, T. (2008). Is the tendency to engage in entrepreneurship genetic? Management Science, 54, 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niewenweg, R., Smit, M. L., Walenkamp, M. J. E., & Wit, M. (2003). Adult height corrected for shrinking and secular trend. Annals of Human Biology, 30, 563–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicka, A., & Fersten, E. (2001). Sex-related differences in interhemispheric transmission time in the human brain. NeuroReport, 12, 4171–4175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ober, C., Loisel, D. A., & Gilad, Y. (2008). Sex-specific genetic architecture of human disease. Nature Review Genetics, 9, 911–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Boyle, M. W., Benbow, C. P., & Alexander, J. E. (1995). Sex differences, hemispheric laterality and associated brain activity in the intellectually gifted. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 415–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, M. (1987). Right hemisphere involvement in depression: Toward a neuropsychological theory of negative affective experiences. Biological Psychiatry, 22, 1201–1215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitchford, I. (2001). The origin of violence: Is psychopathy an adaptation? Human Nature Review, 1, 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, R., Martinez, I. G., & Dedmon, A. (1995). Childhood risk taking and injury: Self-report and informant measures. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20, 5–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Stallworth, L. M. (1993). Sexual selection and the sexual and ethnic basis of social hierarchy. In L. Ellis (Ed.), Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality (A comparative biosocial analysis, Vol. 1, pp. 112–137). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preti, A., & Miotto, P. (1999). Suicide and unemployment in Italy, 1982–1994. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 53, 694–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., Lencz, T., Taylor, K., Hellige, J. B., Bihrle, S., Lacasse, L., et al. (2003). Corpus callosum abnormalities in psychopathic antisocial individuals. Archive of General Psychiatry, 60, 1134–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, B., & Rappelsberger, P. (1999). Gender dependent EES: Changes during mental rotation tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 33, 209–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, D. C., Teale, P., Sheeder, J., & Reite, M. (1999). Sex differences in the refractory period of the 100 ms auditory evoked magnetic field. NeuroReport, 10, 3321–3325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblitt, J. C., Soler, H., Johnson, S. E., & Quadagno, D. M. (2001). Sensation seeking and hormones in men and women: Exploring the link. Hormones and Behavior, 40, 396–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, V. S. (2004). The peculiarity of the right-hemisphere function in depression: Solving the paradoxes. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 28, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J., & Bons, T. (2005). Mate choice and friendship in twins. Psychological Science, 16, 555–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savic-Berglund, I. (Ed.). (2010). Sex differences in the human brain. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlutera, N. D., Kramsb, M., Rushwortha, M. F. S., & Passingham, R. E. (2001). Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: The selection of actions. Neuropsychologia, 39, 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmithorst, V., & Holland, S. (2007). Sex differences in the development of neuroanatomical functional connectivity underlying intelligence found using Bayesian connectivity analysis. Neuroimage, 35, 406–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seto, M. C., Khattar, N. A., Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1997). Deception and sexual strategy in psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shammi, P., & Stuss, D. T. (1999). Humor appreciation: A role of the right frontal lobe. Brain, 122, 657–666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shucard, J. L., Shucard, D. W., & Thomas, D. G. (1984). Auditory evoked potentials of probes of hemispheric differences in cognitive processing. Science, 197, 1295–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silventoinen, K., Kaprio, J., Lahelma, E., Viken, R. J., & Rose, R. J. (2001). Sex differences in genetic and environmental factors contributing to body-height. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 4, 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slutske, W. S., Heath, A. C., Dinwiddie, S. H., Madden, P., Bucholtz, K. K., Dunne, M. P., et al. (1997). Modeling genetic and environmental influences in the etiology of conduct disorder: A study of 2, 682 adult twin pairs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 266–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, I., Aleman, A., Bouma, A., & Kahn, R. (2004). Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain, 127, 1845–1852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, I., & Baskin, D. (1992). Sex, race, age, and violent offending. Violence and Victims, 7, 191–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stattin, H., & Magnusson, D. (1996). Antisocial development: A holistic approach. Developmental Psychopathology, 8, 617–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. (2000). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coecion. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troisi, A. (2005). The concept of alternative strategies and its relevance to psychiatry and clinical psychology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 159–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. (1994). The nature of gender. Demography, 31, 561–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vawter, M. P., Evans, S., Choudary, P., Tomita, H., Meador-Woodruff, J., Molnar, M., et al. (2004). Gender-specific gene expression in post-mortem human brain: Localization to sex chromosomes. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, 373–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, J. C., & Gorski, R. A. (2000). Structural sex differences in the mammalian brain: Reconsidering the male/female dichotomy. In A. Malsumoto (Ed.), Sexual differentiation of the brain (pp. 229–239). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. V., Manoli, D. S., Fraser, E. J., Coats, J. K., Honda, S., Harada, N., et al. (2009). Estrogen masculinizes neural pathways and sex-specific behaviors. Cell, 139, 61–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M., Narayanan, J., Arvey, R., Chaturvedi, S., Avolio, B., et al. (2009). The genetic basis of entrepreneurship: Effects of gender and personality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee Ellis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellis, L. Evolutionary Neuroandrogenic Theory and Universal Gender Differences in Cognition and Behavior. Sex Roles 64, 707–722 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9927-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9927-7

Keywords

Navigation