Skip to main content
Log in

Cluster analysis: a useful technique to identify elderly cardiac patients at risk for poor quality of life

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purposes of this study are (1) to examine the frequency of cardiac symptoms in elderly people one year after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and/or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG); (2) to identify patient subgroups (cluster solutions) based on cardiac symptoms after cardiac events and (3) to determine if these subgroups vary based on health related quality of life and psychological distress.

Methods

A sample of 206 elderly, unpartnered, patients (age ≥ 65) were interviewed one year after AMI and/or CABG by telephone. Cardiac symptoms, SF-36, POMS, and QOL-I were measured. A hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify patient subgroups based on cardiac symptoms, using a combination of dendrograms and stopping rules.

Results

Three subgroups were identified: (1) the Weary (19.4%), (2) the Diffuse symptom (68.4%), and (3) the Breathless groups (12.2%). The Weary group had significantly lower scores on all of SF-36 subscales (except for social functioning) and higher scores on all of POMS subscales (except for Anger/hostility and Confusion/Bewilderment) compared to the Diffuse symptom group.

Conclusions

The cluster analysis was useful to identify the subgroup with poorer recovery. Patients in the Weary group need more attention and intervention strategies to improve their health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that some researchers might use the pragmatic approach of dichotomizing continuous scores into extreme groups, or at the median, in order to find groups of observations with similar classifications of the dichotomies—as this would be done in a multi-way contingency table. This practice of dichotomizing variables “wastes” variance and could lead to serious errors in estimation [19, 20] .

References

  1. He, W., Sengupta, M., Velkoff, A. V., et al. (2005). U.S. Census Bureau: Current population report, 65+ in the United States: 2005 (Vol. 30). Washington, DC: U.S.: Government Printing Office.

  2. American Heart Association (2007). 2007 Statistical Fact Sheet – Populations: Older Americans and cardiovascular diseases – Statistics. American Heart Association.

  3. Westin, L., Nilstun, T., Carlsson, R., et al. (2005). Patients with ischemic heart disease: Quality of life predicts long-term mortality. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, 39(1–2), 50–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rumsfeld, J. S., MaWhinney, S., McCarthy, M., Jr., et al. (1999). Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery. JAMA, 281(14), 1298–1303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grace, S. L., Abbey, S. E., Irvine, J., et al. (2004). Prospective examination of anxiety persistence and its relationship to cardiac symptoms and recurrent cardiac events. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 73(6), 344–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dodd, M. J., Miaskowski, C., & Paul, S. M. (2001). Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 28(3), 465–470.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gift, A. G., Jablonski, A., Stommel, M., et al. (2004). Symptom clusters in elderly patients with lung cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31(2), 202–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, H. J., McGuire, D. B., Tulman, L., et al. (2005). Symptom clusters: Concept analysis and clinical implications for cancer nursing. Cancer Nursing, 28(4), 270–282 (quiz 283–274).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll, D. L., Rankin, S. H., & Cooper, B. A. (2007). The effects of a collaborative peer advisor/advanced practice nurse intervention: Cardiac rehabilitation participation and rehospitalization in older adults after a cardiac event. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22(4), 313–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1988). The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care, 26(7), 724–735.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrans, C. E., & Ferrell, B. R. (1992). [Quality of life studies in nursing science (1). Development of a quality of life index for patients]. Kango Kenkyu, 25(2), 117–124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1992). POMS manual: Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Edits.

  15. Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine, 32(6), 705–714.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindgren, G. T., Fukuoka, Y., Rankin, H. S., et al. (In press). Cluster analysis of elderly cardiac patients’ prehospital symptomatology. Nursing Research.

  17. Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., et al. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(5), 373–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., & Leese, M. (2001). Cluster analysis. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., et al. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Royston, P., Altman, D. G., & Sauerbrei, W. (2006). Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: A bad idea. Statistics in Medicine, 25(1), 127–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Milligan, G., & Cooper, M. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50(2), 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miaskowski, C., Cooper, B. A., Paul, S. M., et al. (2006). Subgroups of patients with cancer with different symptom experiences and quality-of-life outcomes: a cluster analysis. Oncology Nursing Forum, 33(5), E79–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fox, S. W., & Lyon, D. E. (2006). Symptom clusters and quality of life in survivors of lung cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 33(5), 931–936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Agewall, S., Berglund, M., & Henareh, L. (2004). Reduced quality of life after myocardial infarction in women compared with men. Clinical Cardiology, 27(5), 271–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lukkarinen, H., & Hentinen, M. (1998). Assessment of quality of life with the Nottingham Health Profile among women with coronary artery disease. Heart & Lung, 27(3), 189–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Herlitz, J., Wiklund, I., Sjoland, H., et al. (2001). Relief of symptoms and improvement of health-related quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass graft in women and men. Clinical Cardiology, 24(5), 385–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Aben, I., Verhey, F., Strik, J., et al. (2003). A comparative study into the one year cumulative incidence of depression after stroke and myocardial infarction. Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery Psychiatry, 74(5), 581–585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thombs, B. D., Bass, E. B., Ford, D. E., et al. (2006). Prevalence of depression in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(1), 30–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lenzen, M., Scholte op Reimer, W., Norekval, T. M., et al. (2006). Pharmacological treatment and perceived health status during 1-year follow up in patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease, but ineligible for revascularization. Results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 5(2), 115–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lesman-Leegte, I., Jaarsma, T., Sanderman, R., et al. (2006). Depressive symptoms are prominent among elderly hospitalised heart failure patients. European Journal of Heart Failure, 8(6), 634–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Freedland, K. E., Rich, M. W., Skala, J. A., et al. (2003). Prevalence of depression in hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(1), 119–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge support from the NINR R01 NR005205 for Drs. Rankin and Carroll, NIH T32 NR07088 symptom management postdoctoral fellowships for Drs. Lindgren and Fukuoka and support from NICHD 9K12 HD052163-06 and UCSF’s Office of Research on Women’s Health for Dr. Fukuoka.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshimi Fukuoka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fukuoka, Y., Lindgren, T.G., Rankin, S.H. et al. Cluster analysis: a useful technique to identify elderly cardiac patients at risk for poor quality of life. Qual Life Res 16, 1655–1663 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9272-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9272-7

Keywords

Navigation