The Effectiveness of Direct Instruction for Teaching Language to Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Identifying Materials

• Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Revision). Washington, DC: Author.

• Benner, G. J., Trout, A., Nordness, P. D., Nelson, J. R., Epstein, M. H., Knobel, M., et al. (2002). The effects of the Language for Learning program on the receptive language skills of kindergarten children. Journal of Direct Instruction, 2, 67–74.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). Manual for the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

  Google Scholar 

• Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., & Babbitt, B. P. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 99–111. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00066.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2002). Increasing the reading achievement of at-risk children through Direct Instruction: Evaluation of the Rodeo Institute for Teacher Excellence (RITE). Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7, 141–166. doi:10.1207/S15327671ESPR0702_3.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Engelmann, S., Haddox, P., Hanner, S., & Osborn, J. (2002). Corrective reading thinking basics: Comprehension level A. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Engelmann, S., & Osborn, J. (1999). Language for Learning. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Flores, M. M., & Ganz, J. B. (2007). Effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching statement inference, use of facts, and analogies to students with developmental disabilities and reading delays. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 244–251.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fredrick, L. D., Keel, M. C., & Neel, J. H. (2002). Making the most of instructional time: Teachign reading at an accelerated rate to students at risk. Journal of Direct Instruction, 2, 57–63.

  Google Scholar 

• Grossen, B. (2004). Success of a Direct Instruction model at a secondary level school with high-risk students. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 20, 161–178. doi:10.1080/10573560490262091.

  Google Scholar 

• Hammill, D., & Newcomer, P. L. (1997). Test of Language Development-Intermediate (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

  Google Scholar 

• Harris, C. A., Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1995). Teaching initial multiplication skills to students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 180–196.

  Google Scholar 

• Humphries, T., Neufeld, M., Johnson, C., Engels, K., & McKay, R. (2005). A pilot study of the effect of Direct Instruction programming on the academic performance of students with intractable epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior, 6, 405–412. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.01.015.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & McNerney, E. K. (2001). Pivotal areas in intervention for autism. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 19–32. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3001_4.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Kjelgaard, M. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic subgroups. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 287–308. doi:10.1080/01690960042000058.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lord, C., Risi, S., & Pickles, A. (2004). Trajectory of language development in autistic spectrum disorders. In M. L. Rice & S. F. Warren (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• MacIver, M. A., & Kemper, E. (2002). The impact of Direct Instruction on elementary students’ reading achievement in an urban school district. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7, 197–220. doi:10.1207/S15327671ESPR0702_5.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2003). Analysis of WISC-III, Stanford-Binet:IV, and academic achievement test scores in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 329–341. doi:10.1023/A:1024462719081.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992a). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 19–35.

  Google Scholar 

• Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992b). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 19–35.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1993a). Using data to learn about concrete-semiconcrete-abstract instruction for students with math disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 89–96.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1993b). Mnemonics: Enhancing the math performance of students with learning difficulties. Intervention in School and Clinic, 29, 78–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Nation, K., & Norbury, C. F. (2005). Why reading comprehension fails: Insights from developmental disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 21–32.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Richards, S. B., Taylor, R. L., Ramasamy, R., & Richards, R. Y. (1999). Single subject research: Applications in educational and clinical settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning.

  Google Scholar 

• Ryder, R. J., Burton, J. L., & Silberg, A. (2006). Longitudinal study of direction Instruction effects from first through third grades. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 179–191. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.3.179-192.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1988). Childhood Autism Rating Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

  Google Scholar 

• Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221–242. doi:10.1177/01454455980223001.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., Steventon, C., & Sartor, D. (2005). A comparison of two Direct Instruction reading programs for urban middle school students. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 175–182. doi:10.1177/07419325050260030501.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, V., Mirenda, P., & Zaidman-Zait, A. (2007). Predictors of expressive vocabulary growth in children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 50, 149–160. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/013).

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Stein, M., Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. (1997). Designing effective mathematics instruction: A Direct Instruction approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Waldron-Soler, K. M., Martella, R. C., Marchand-Martella, N. E., Tso, M. E., Warner, D. A., & Miller, D. E. (2002). Effects of a 15-week Language for Learning implementation with children in an integrated preschool. Journal of Direct Instruction, 2, 75–86.

  Google Scholar 

• Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction approach. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 121–131. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00068.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references