Abstract
Urbanization may affect genetic differentiation among animal populations because it converts native vegetation to novel land cover types that can affect population connectivity. The effect of land cover change on genetic differentiation may vary among taxa; mobile birds may be least affected. Regardless, genetic differentiation between populations should be best predicted by measures of distance that incorporate the effect of land cover on movement. We studied the relationship between land cover and genetic differentiation in Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia) at eighteen sites in the Seattle metropolitan region. We generated a series of hypothetical “resistance surfaces” based on land cover and development age, calculated “resistance distances” between pairs of sampling sites, and related them to pairwise genetic differentiation. Genetic differentiation was best described by a multiple regression model where resistance to gene flow (1) linearly increased with age of development and (2) was greater in high- and medium-density urbanization than in native forest land cover types (R 2 = 0.15; p = 0.003). The single variable with the highest correlation with genetic differentiation was derived from a linear relationship between development age and resistance (R 2 = 0.08; p = 0.007). Our results thus suggested that urban development reduced population connectivity for Song Sparrows. However, the relation of development age to genetic differentiation suggested that equilibrium was not yet reached. Hence, the effects of lost connectivity will increase. Our understanding of the landscape genetics of this recently anthropogenically modified landscape benefited from considering population history.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson MJ (2001) Permutation tests for univariate and multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:626–639
Andrews KM, Gibbons JW (2005) How do highways influence snake movement? Behavioral responses to roads and vehicles. Copeia 4:772–782
Arcese P, Sogge MK, Marr AB, Patten MA (2002) Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, vol 704. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia
Arctander P (1988) Comparative studies of avian DNA by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis: convenient procedures based on blood samples from live birds. J Ornithol 129:S205–S216
Arguedas N, Parker PG (2000) Seasonal migration and genetic population structure in house wrens. Condor 102:517–528
Badyaev AV, Young RL, Oh KP, Addison C (2008) Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 62:1951–1964
Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow and population structure. Quart Rev Biol 74:21–45
Boutin-Ganache I, Raposo M, Raymond M, Deschepper CF (2001) M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. Biotechniques 31:25–28
Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by tag DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques 20:1004–1010
Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JFY, Burke T (1992) Single-locus and multilocus DNA fingerprinting. In: Hoelzel AR (ed) Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 225–269
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Chan Y, Arcese P (2002) Subspecific differentiation and conservation of Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia) in the San Francisco Bay region inferred by microsatellite loci analysis. Auk 119:641–657
Chan Y, Arcese P (2003) Morphological and microsatellite differentiation in Melospiza melodia (Aves) at a microgeographic scale. J Evol Biol 16:939–947
Crochet P-A (1996) Can measures of gene flow help to evaluate bird dispersal? Acta Oecol 17:459–474
Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499
Delaney KS, Riley SPD, Fisher RN (2010) A rapid, strong, and convergent genetic response to urban habitat fragmentation in four divergent and widespread vertebrates. PLoS ONE 5(9):e12767. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012767
Donnelly RE (2002) Design of habitat reserves and settlements for bird conservation in the Seattle metropolitan area. University of Washington, Dissertation
Donnelly R, Marzluff JM (2006) Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosyst 9:99–117
Environmental Systems Research Institute (2002) ArcView 3.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA
Garroway CJ, Bowman J, Wilson PJ (2011) Using a genetic network to parameterize a landscape resistance surface for fishers, Martes pennanti. Mol Ecol 20:3978–3988
Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html
Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Harris RJ, Reed JM (2002) Behavioral barriers to non-migratory movements of birds. Ann Zool Fenn 35:275–290
Hedrick PW (2000) Genetics of populations, 2nd edn. Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, MA
Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633–1638
Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
Jeffery KJ, Keller LF, Arcese P, Bruford MW (2001) The development of microsatellite loci in the Song Sparrow, Melospiza melodia (Aves) and genotyping errors associated with good quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 1:1–13
Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, Murphy M, Luikart G (2010) Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19:4179–4191
Lee-Yaw JA, Davidson A, McRae BH, Green DM (2009) Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog? Mol Ecol 18:1863–1874
Lepczyk CA, Mertig AG, Liu JI (2003) Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biol Conserv 115:191–201
MacDougall-Shackleton EA, Clinchy M, Zanette L, Neff BD (2012) Songbird genetic diversity is lower in anthropogenically versus naturally fragmented landscapes. Conserv Genet 12:1195–1203
Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18:189–197
Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Norwell, MA, pp 19–47
Marzluff JM, Rodewald AD (2008) Conserving biodiversity in urbanizing areas: nontraditional views from a bird’s perspective. Cities Environ 1:6
Marzluff JM, Withey JC, Whittaker KA, Oleyar MD, Unfried TM, Rullman S, Delap J (2007) Consequences of habitat utilization by nest predators and breeding songbirds across multiple scales in an urbanizing landscape. Condor 109:516–534
McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology and conservation. Ecology 10:2712–2724
Meirmans PG (2006) Using the AMOVA framework to estimate a standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 60:2399–2402
Pruett CL, Arcese P, Chan YL, Wilson AG, Patten MA, Keller LF, Winker K (2008a) Concordant and discordant signals between genetic data and described subspecies of Pacific Coast Song Sparrows. Condor 110:359–364
Pruett CL, Arcese A, Chan YL, Wilson AG, Patten MA, Keller LF, Winker K (2008b) The effects of contemporary processes in maintaining the genetic structure of western Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Heredity 101:67–74
Puget Sound Regional Council (2007) Population change and net migration. Puget Sound Trends no. D7. Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle, WA. http://www.psrc.org/assets/785/d7feb07.pdf. Accessed June 2010
Ray N (2005) PATHMATRIX: a GIS tool to compute effective distances among samples. Mol Ecol Notes 5:177–180
Raybould AF, Clarke RT, Bond JM, Welters RE, Gliddon CJ (2002) Inferring patterns of dispersal from allele frequency data. In: Bullock JM, Kenward RE, Hails RS (eds) Dispersal ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 89–112
Robinson L, Newell JP, Marzluff JM (2005) Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 71:51–72
Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228
Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP ‘007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Notes 8:103–106
Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494
Sardell RJ, Keller LF, Arcese P, Bucher T, Reid JM (2010) Comprehensive paternity assignment: genotype, spatial location and social status in song sparrows, Melospiza Melodia. Mol Ecol 19:4352–4364
Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ Jr, Link WA (2011) The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966–2010. Version 12.07.2011. Accessed 5 Sept 2012
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234
Schwartz MK, Copeland JP, Anderson NJ, Squires JR, Inman RM, McKelvey KS, Pilgrim KL, Waits LP, Cushman SA (2009) Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology 90:3222–3232
Smith LM, Burgoyne LA (2004) Collecting, archiving and processing DNA from wildlife samples using FTA® databasing paper. BMC Ecol 4:4. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/4. Accessed June 2010
Stenzler LM, Makarewich CA, Coulon A, Ardia DR, Lovette IJ, Winkler DW (2009) Subtle edge-of-range genetic structuring in transcontinentally distributed North American Tree Swallows. Condor 111:470–478
Sutherland GD, Harestad AS, Price K, Lertzman KP (2000) Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4:16
R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed June 2010
Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30
Unfried TM (2009) Urban landscape relationships with Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population structure and connectivity and human health and behavior. Dissertation, University of Washington
Varvio S-L, Chakraborty R, Nei M (1986) Genetic variation in subdivided populations and conservation genetics. Heredity 57:189–198
Veit SL, Robertson RJ, Hamel PB, Friesen VL (2005) Population genetic structure and dispersal across a fragmented landscape in cerulean warblers (Dendroica cerulea). Conserv Genet 6:159–174
Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166:1963–1979
Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370
Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1999) Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: F ST ≠ 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity 82:117–125
Whittaker KA, Marzluff JM (2009) Species-specific survival and relative habitat use in an urban landscape during the postfledging period. Auk 126:288–299
Whittaker KA, Marzluff JM (2012) Post-fledging mobility in an urban landscape. In: Lepczyk CA, Warren PS (eds) Urban bird ecology and conservation. Stud Avian Biol (no. 45). University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 183–198
Wilson AG, Arcese P, Chan YL, Patten MA (2011) Micro-spatial genetic structure in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Conserv Genet 12:213–222
With KA (2004) Metapopulation dynamics: perspectives from landscape ecology. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, London, pp 23–44
Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138
Acknowledgments
M. Alberti and J. Hepinstall of the University of Washington’s Urban Ecology Research Laboratory provided the classified Landsat TM imagery. Sample collection was aided by M. D. Oleyar, S. Rullman, K. Whittaker, J. Delap, M. Dickerson, and C. Templeton. J. Lawler provided computing resources. Molecular laboratory and analytical assistance was provided by T. R. Seamons, M. Baird, L. Newton, B. Godfrey, and H. D. Bradshaw. The research was conducted under an animal use protocol overseen by the University of Washington IACUC and permits issued by the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife and USGS Bird Banding Laboratory. This material is based upon work supported under a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to TMU. Project funding was also provided by NSF Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship for Urban Ecology (National Science Foundation awards DEB-9875041, BCS0120024, BCS 0508002 and IGERT0114351), Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Seattle Chapter, and University of Washington College of Forest Resources. We thank R. Holderegger and four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Unfried, T.M., Hauser, L. & Marzluff, J.M. Effects of urbanization on Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population connectivity. Conserv Genet 14, 41–53 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0422-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-012-0422-2