Skip to main content
Log in

The labellar sugar receptor ofDrosophila

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The electrophysiology of the sugar receptor in labellar taste hairs ofDrosophila melanogaster (Diptera) was investigated using 33 monosaccharides, oligosaccharides, glucosides, and amino acids which in calyptrate flies are known to bind to specific receptor sites or which may be assigned to specific receptor sites on the basis of structural criteria.

  2. 2.

    The pyranose site ofDrosophila is very similar to the pyranose site of the calyptrate flies: regarding monosaccharides of the pyranose type three adjacent equatorial hydroxyl groups (C-2, C-3, C-4) seem to be important for stimulating effectiveness. On the other hand, it exhibits a more rigid stereospecificity with regard to the substituents at C-1 and C-5.

  3. 3.

    A furanose site as in calyptrate flies does not exist inDrosophila. First, D-galactose, phenylalanine and 2,5-anhydro-D-mannitol are not or nearly not stimulatory. Secondly, according to different sugar receptor responses after treatment of the taste hairs with papain, D-fucose binds to another receptor site than D-fructose. Thirdly, the effective conformation of D-fructose is not the furanose, but most probably the pyranose form as can be concluded from experiments with freshly prepared and equilibrium solutions of D-fructose.

  4. 4.

    The characteristic differences between the properties of the sugar receptors ofDrosophila and of the calyptrate flies lead to the suggestion that the actual number of types of receptor sites in the various fly species is greater than assumed up till now. The broad specificity of the sugar receptors of flies may therefore result from a mosaic of different types of highly specific receptor sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dethier VG (1955) The physiology and histology of the contact chemoreceptors of the blowfly. Q Rev Biol 30:348–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier VG (1976) The hungry fly. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Ephrussi B, Beadle GW (1936) A technique of transplantation inDrosophila. Am Nat 70:218–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DR (1963) Chemical structure and stimulation by carbohydrates. In: Zotterman Y (ed) Olfaction and taste. I. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 165–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk R, Bleiser-Avivi N, Atidia J (1976) Labellar taste organs ofDrosophila melanogaster. J Morphol 150:327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujishiro N, Kijima H, Morita H (1984) Impulse frequency and action potential amplitude in labellar chemosensory neurones ofDrosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 30:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanamori T, Shiraishi A, Kijima H, Morita H (1972) Stimulation of labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly by glucosides. Z Vergl Physiol 76:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanamori T, Shiraishi A, Kijima H, Morita H (1974) Structure of effective monosaccharides in stimulation of the sugar receptor of the fly. Chem Senses and Flavor 1:147–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen K (1978) Insect chemoreception. In: Hazelbauer GL (ed) Receptors and recognition. Ser B, vol 5. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 231–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Hille B (1976) Gating in sodium channels of nerve. Annu Rev Physiol 38:139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson ES, Roeder KD (1956) Electrophysiological studies of arthropod chemoreception. I. General properties of the labellar chemoreceptors of Diptera. J Cell Comp Physiol 48:51–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Isono K, Kikuchi T (1974a) Autosomal recessive mutation in sugar response ofDrosophila. Nature 248:243–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Isono K, Kikuchi T (1974b) Behavioral and electrical responses to sugars inDrosophila melanogaster. Jpn J Genet 49:113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakinovich W Jr, Goldstein U, Baumgarten RJ von, Agranoff BW (1971) Sugar receptor specificity in the fleshfly,Sarcophaga bullata. Brain Res 35:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi T (1975) Genetic alteration of insect sugar reception. In: Denton DA, Coglan JP (eds) Olfaction and taste V. Academic Press, New York, pp 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengeler J (1980) Die biologischen Funktionen bakterieller Transportsysteme. Forum Mikrobiol 6:359–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita H, Shiraishi A (1968) Stimulation of the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly by monoand disaccharides. J Gen Physiol 52:559–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita H, Shiraishi A (1985) Chemoreception physiology. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. 6. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 133–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninomiya M, Shimada I (1976) Stereospecificity for oligosaccharides of two receptor sites in a labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly. J Insect Physiol 22:483–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Piesch D (1983) Computer-Auswertung von Mehrzell-Aktionspotentialen mit hohem Rauschanteil. Diplomarbeit, Universität Regensburg, FRG

    Google Scholar 

  • Piesch D, Wieczorek H (1982) Computer analysis of multi-unit spike trains with a low signal to noise ratio. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 75:325

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues V, Siddiqi O (1981) A gustatory mutant ofDrosophila defective in pyranose receptors. Mol Gen Genet 181:406–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada I (1975) Two receptor sites and their relation to amino acid stimulation in the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly. J Insect Physiol 21:1675–1680

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada I (1978) The stimulating effect of fatty acids and amino acid stimulation in the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly. J Gen Physiol 71:19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada I, Isono K (1978) The specific receptor site for aliphatic carboxylate anion in the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly. J Insect Physiol 24:807–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada I, Shiraishi A, Kijima H, Morita H (1974) Separation of two receptor sites in a single labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly by treatment with p-chloromercuribenzoate. J Insect Physiol 20:605–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada I, Horiki H, Ohrui H, Meguro H (1985) Taste response to 2,5-anhydro-D-hexitols; rigid stereospecificity of the furanose site in the sugar receptor of the flesh fly. J Comp Physiol A 157:477–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiraishi A, Kuwabara M (1970) The effects of amino acids on the labellar hair chemosensory cells of the fly. J Gen Physiol 56:768–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi T, Toda H, Isemura T (1971) Bacterial and mold amylases. In: Boyer PD (ed) The enzymes, V. Academic Press, New York London, pp 235–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanimura T, Shimada I (1981) Multiple receptor proteins for sweet taste inDrosophila discriminated by papain treatment. J Comp Physiol 141:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanimura T, Isono K, Takamura T, Shimada I (1982) Genetic dimorphism in the taste sensitivity to trehalose inDrosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 147:433–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma JA, Brothers Ch, Spradlin J (1970) Subsite mapping of enzymes. Studies onBacillus subtilis amylase. Biochemistry 9:1768–1775

    Google Scholar 

  • Weast RC (ed) (1987) CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek H (1980) Sugar reception by an insect water receptor. J Comp Physiol 138:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek H, Köppl R (1978) Effect of sugars on the labellar water receptor of the fly. J Comp Physiol 126:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek H, Köppl R (1982) Reaction spectra of sugar receptors in different taste hairs of the fly. J Comp Physiol 149:207–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek H, Shimada I, Hopperdietzel C (1988) Treatment with pronase uncouples water and sugar reception in the labellar water receptor of the blowfly. J Comp Physiol A 163:413–419

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wieczorek, H., Wolff, G. The labellar sugar receptor ofDrosophila . J. Comp. Physiol. 164, 825–834 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00616754

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00616754

Keywords

Navigation