Summary
Most of the commercial hybrids of indica rice are based on wild abortive (WA) source of cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility (CMS). Such cytoplasmic uniformity may lead to genetic vulnerability to disease and insect pests. To overcome this problem, diversification of CMS sources is essential. Crosses of 46 accessions of O. perennis and two accessions of O. rufipogon as female parents were made with two restorers (IR54, IR64) of WA cytosterility. Sterile hybrids were backcrossed with the respective recurrent parents. Of all the backcross derivatives, one line having the cytoplasm of O. perennis Acc 104823 and the nuclear background of IR64 was found to be stable for male sterility. The newly developed CMS line has been designated as IR66707A. This line is completely sterile (0% seed set) under selfed conditions. Crosses of IR66707A with 10 restorers of WA cytoplasm showed almost complete (93–100%) pollen sterility, indicating that the male sterility source of IR66707A is different from WA sterility. Southern hybridization of IR66707A, O. perennis (cytoplasmic donor), IR66707B (maintainer) and V20A (WA cytoplasm) using mitochondrial DNA specific probes (5 endonucleases × 8 probes) showed identical banding patterns between IR66707A and O. perennis. However, in more than half of the combinations, different banding patterns were observed between IR66707A and IR66707B and between IR66707A and V20A. The results suggest that IR66707A has the same cytoplasm as the donor (O. perennis), and CMS may not be caused by any major rearrangement or modification of mtDNA. The new CMS source identified will be useful in cytoplasmic diversification in hybrid rice breeding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dellaporta, S.L., J., Wood & J.B., Hicks, 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1 (4): 19: 21.
Hooker, A.L., 1974. Cytoplasmic susceptibility in plant disease. Ann. Rev. Phytopath 12: 167–169.
Ishii, T., O., Panaud, D.S., Brar & G.S., Khush, 1990. Use of nonradioactive digoxigenin-labeled DNA probes for RFLP analysis in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 8: 167–171.
Ishii, T., T., Terachi, N., Mori & K., Tsunewaki, 1993. Comparative study on the chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear genome differentiation in two cultivated rice species, Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima, by RFLP analyses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 88–96.
Kadowaki, K., K., Yazaki, T., Osumi, K., Harada & M., Nakagahra, 1988. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in male-sterile cytoplasm of rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 234–236.
Newton, K.J., 1988. Plant mitochondrial genomes: organization, expression and variation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 503–532.
Sakamoto, W., K., Kadowaki, S., Tano & T., Yabuno, 1990. Analysis of mitochondrial DNAs from Oryza glaberrima and its cytoplasmic substituted line for Oryza sativa associated with cytoplasmic male sterility. Jpn. J. Genet. 65: 1–6.
Shikanai, T., Z.A., Yang & Y., Yamada, 1987. Properties of the circular plasmid-like DNA from mitochondria of cytoplasmic male-sterile rice. Plant Cell. Physiol. 28: 1243–1251.
Shinjyo, C., 1969. Cytoplasmic-genetic male sterility in cultivated rice, Oryza sativa L. II. The inheritance of male sterility. Jpn. J. Genet. 44: 149–156.
Virmani, S.S. & I.B., Edwards, 1983. Current status and future prospects for breeding hybrid rice and wheat. Adv. Agron. 36: 145–214.
Virmani, S.S. & C., Shinjyo, 1988. Current status of analysis and symbols of male-sterile cytoplasms and fertility-restoring genes. Rice Genet. Newsl. 5: 9–15.
Yuan, L.P., 1993. Advantages of and constraints to the use of hybrid rice varieties. In: K.J., Wilson (Ed.). International Workshop on Apomixis in Rice. pp. 1–4. Rockefeller Foundation, New York and China National Centre for Biotechnology Development, Beijing, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dalmacio, R., Brar, D.S., Ishii, T. et al. Identification and transfer of a new cytoplasmic male sterility source from Oryza perennis into indica rice (O. sativa). Euphytica 82, 221–225 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029564
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029564