Skip to main content

On the Way to the Future of Smelling

How Fragrances Increasingly Excite the Brain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beautiful SCENT

Abstract

For over 2000 years, research has been underway to track down the scent. Meanwhile, brain research or neuroperfumery knows of three olfactory feedback loops in the brain and two types of sensory perception that influence smelling, perfume and effect. We will also discuss how findings from neuroperfumery combined with AI are currently ushering in the future of perfumery and increasingly enabling a new category of perfumes: active fragrances or neuroscents. The big keyword here is “mood & health modulation”. This development certainly also carries risks that the legislator must keep in mind. The key question is therefore: How strong can perfumes actually work? However, through neuroperfumery, one also comes to more and more findings about what makes certain scents so special, for example citrus notes, and why one can become “addicted” to them. They have a sophisticated broadband effect on the neocortex and stimulate in many ways. This type of multiple brain stimulation provides suggestions for the research and application of fragrance molecules and thus also for the future of smelling and perfumery. Based on current findings from neuroperfumery, I will give tips for fragrance consulting at the end of the chapter: how to inspire the brain for a new perfume or how to give it a little help.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adolphs R (2010) Social cognition: Feeling voices to recognize emotions. Curr Biol 20:R1071–R1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barden P (2013) Decoded—the science behind why we buy. Wiley, Phil Barden

    Google Scholar 

  • Benchetrit G (2000) Breathing pattern in humans: diversity and individuality. Respir Physiol 122(2–3):123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhle JT et al (2014) Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. In: Cerebral Cortex, Bd 24, S 2981–2990

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdenzi C et al (2017) Individual differences in verbal and non-verbal affective responses to smells: influence of odor label across cultures. Chem Senses 42(1):37–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fried I et al (1998) Electric current stimulates laughter. Nature 391:650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried JA (2006) Smell: central nervous processing. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 63:44–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg M (2012) How to prevent stress from shrinking your brain. Published on August 12, (The mindful self-express) in Psychology Today. Ongoing blog

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan MT et al (2019) A fear memory engram and its plasticity in the hypothalamic oxytocin system. Neuron 04:029

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatt H, Dee R (2012) Das kleine Buch vom Riechen und Schmecken. Albrecht Klaus, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz RS, Eliassen J, Beland S, Souza T (2004) Neuroimaging evidence for the emotional potency of odor-evoked memory. Neuropsychologia 42:371–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Illig KR, Wilson DA (2014) Olfactory cortex: comparative anatomy. In: Reference module in biomedical sciences. ScienceDirekt, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareken DA, Sabri M, Radnovich AJ, Claus E, Foresman B, Hector D, Hutchins GD (2004) Olfactory system activation from sniffing: effects in piriform and orbitofrontal cortex. Neuroimage 22(1):456–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna A (2010) Sensory marketing: research on the sensuality of products. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leistikow A (2019) Das Recht auf Schönheit—ein Plädoyer der Literatur. An Vio, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik B et al (2019) Mammalian taste cells express functional olfactory receptors. Chem Senses 44(5):289–301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, R.C. et al. (2019) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Braz J Psychiatry 41(5): 447–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Nani A et al (2019) The neural correlates of consciousness and attention: two sister processes of the brain. Front Neurosci 13:1169

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa S et al (1990) Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9868–9872

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen RK, Moses SN, Riggs L, Ryan JD (2012) The hippocampus supports multiple cognitive processes through relational binding and comparison. Front Hum Neurosci 6:146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET (2004) The functions of the orbitofrontal cortex. Brain Cogn 55(1):11–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romoli L et al (2012) fMRI study of smell: perceptual, cognitive and semantic components of cortical elaboration of 3 familiar aromas—Lecture. German Research School for Simulation Sciences, Jülich

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheline YL, Sanghavi M, Mintun MA et al (1999) Depression duration but not age predicts hippocampal volume loss in medically healthy women with recurrent major depression. J Neurosci 19:5034–5043

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel N, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Goode RL, Sullivan EV, Gabrieli JD (1998) Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in the human olfactory cortex. Nature 392(6673):282–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sowndhararajan K, Kim S (2016) Influence of fragrances on human. Psychophysiological activity: with special reference to human electroencephalographic response. Sci Pharm 84(4):724–752. (School of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turin L (1996) A spectroscopic mechanism forprimary olfactory reception. Chem Senses 21(6):773–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vedaei F et al (2016) The human olfactory system: cortical brain mapping using fMRI. In Neuroradiology (in Press e16250). In: Iranian Journal of Radiology 14(2):e16250

    Google Scholar 

  • Welge-Lüssen A et al (2002) Grundlagen, Methoden und Indikationen der objektiven Olfaktometrie. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 81:661–667

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Mensing .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mensing, J. (2023). On the Way to the Future of Smelling. In: Beautiful SCENT. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67259-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics