Skip to main content

Big and Small Moments of Modern Perfumery

From the Search for the Blue Flower and the Atlantis of Perfumery—How Perfumery Became What It is Today

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beautiful SCENT
  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss the second revolution of perfume and see how it came to the first scent of emancipation. We also examine the ups and downs of perfume from different perspectives. So we illuminate the important role of Charles Baudelaire for the development of modern perfume. But we also see that not a few of the famous classical philosophers have expressed themselves disparagingly about the sense of smell and the effect of scents. I therefore introduce you to the “Godfather” of perfume—Friedrich Nietzsche—who has contributed a great deal to the image enhancement and fascination of the sense of smell and smelling. The romantic era also contributed a lot to the positive image of perfume. But we also get to know another side of perfume, which stigmatizes, excludes and spies out the olfactory. Pheromones in humans are a controversial topic in research and have caused a rise and fall of the perfume image with perfumes that did not keep their promises. Although the existence of pheromone receptors has now been discovered in humans, which can be activated by the fragrance Hedion (a synthetic fragrance with a floral character), one is not really sure whether the receptors are involved in sexual readiness. After reading this chapter, the reader can weigh up good arguments for why he belongs to the pheromone believers or unbelievers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Translated by the author from Guernes, 7 https://christian-0-guernes.blogspot.com.

References

  • Berger S et al (2017) Exposure to hedione increases reciprocity in humans. Front Behav Neurosci 11:79

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Canetti E (1992) Masse und Macht. Claassen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakkarath P, Weidemann D (2018) Kulturpsychologische Gegenwartsdiagnosen: Bestandsaufnahmen zu Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Transcript, Bielefeld

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen C, Howes D, Synnott A (1994) Aroma: The cultural history of smell. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin A (1984) Pesthauch und Blütenduft. Eine Geschichte des Geruchs. Wagenbach, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • De Villa M (2017) “Who are you, incomprehensible you spirit” Perfume in nineteenth and twentieth-century German literature. In: Ciani Forza (Eds) Perfume and literature, the persistence of the ephemeral. Linea edizioni, Padua pp. 179–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Flammersberger T (2016) Baudelaire und die Moderne—Charles Baudelaire. Der Dichter der Modernität? Hausarbeit, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (Romanistik)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelstein S et al (2011) Human tears contain a chemosignal. Science 331(6014):226–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer K, Jütte A (1995) Der Krieg der Düfte—Bedeutung der Pheromone für die menschliche Reproduktion. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 37(1997):149–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins ET (1987) Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychol Rev 94:319–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurton A (1994) Erotik des Parfums. Fischer, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Largey GP, Watson DR (1972) The sociology of odours. Am J Sociol 77(6):1021–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Guérer A (1992) Die Macht der Gerüche. Eine Philosophie der Nase. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Leistikow A (2019) Das Recht auf Schönheit—ein Plädoyer der Literatur. An Vio, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartney W (1968) Olfaction and Odours: An Osphrésiological Essay. Springer, Berlin\Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Miertsch B (2005) Parfum, donc souvenir?—Bedeutung und Einfluss von Geruch(ssinn) in ‘Le Flacon’ und ‘Parfum Exotique’ von C. Baudelaire (Fleurs du Mal). Studienarbeit, GRIN

    Google Scholar 

  • Novalis (1978–1987) Werke, Tagebücher und Briefe Friedrich von Hardenberg, hrsg. von H. J. Mähl und Richard Samuel, München: Carl Hanser Bd. 1, p. 240

    Google Scholar 

  • Oren C et al (2019) A scent of romance: human putative pheromone affects men’s sexual cognition. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 14:719–726

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raab J (1998) Die soziale Konstruktion olfaktorischer Wahrnehmung. Eine Soziologie des Geruchs. Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades des Doktors der Sozialwissenschaften an der Universität Konstanz

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinarz J (2014) Past scents: historical perspectives on smell. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmel E (1988) Das Buch des Parfums. Die klassische Geschichte des Parfums und der Toilette. Ullstein, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindisbacher H (2015) What’s this smell? Shifting worlds of olfactory perception. KulturPoetik 15(1):70–104. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Savic I, Berglund H (2010) Androstenol—A steroid derived odor activates the hypothalamus in women. PLoS One 5(2):e8651

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd G (2013) Neurogastronomy: how the brain creates flavor and why it matters. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G (1992) Soziologie. Untersuchungen über Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Süskind P (1985) Das Parfum. Die Geschichte eines Mörders. Diogenes, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullett W (2019) The past stinks: a brief history of smells and social spaces: in the conversation newsletter (theconversation.com) published August 9, 2019. Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, Apicella C (2017) Synthetic copulin does not affect men’s sexual behavior. Adapt Hum Behav Physiol 4:121–137. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, Jacobson A (2016) Effect of copulins on rating of female attractiveness, mate-guarding, and self-perceived sexual desirability. Evol Psychol 14(2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlleben P (2019) Das geheime Band zwischen Mensch und Natur. Ludwig, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt TD (2015) The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles. Proc Biol Sci 282(1804):20142994

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Y, Zhuang Y et al (2019) Human chemosignals modulate emotional perception of biological motion in a sex-specific manner. Psychoneuroendocrinology 100:246–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Mensing .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mensing, J. (2023). Big and Small Moments of Modern Perfumery. In: Beautiful SCENT. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67259-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics