Transformation of Society: Governance of Global Crises

• Alonso-Yanez, G., House Peters, L., Garcia-Cartagena, M., Bonelli, S., Lorenzo-Arana, I., & Ohira, M. (2019). Mobilizing Transdisciplinary Collaborations: Collective Reflections on Decentering Academia in Knowledge Production. Global Sustainability, 2(e5), 1–6.

  Google Scholar 

• Andrews, K. (2021). The Age of Empire. How Racism and Colonialism Still Rule the World. Penguin Randomhouse UK.

  Google Scholar 

• Bammer, G., O’Rourke, M., O’Connell, D., Neuhauser, L., Midgley, G., Julie Thompson Klein, J., Grigg, N. J., Gadlin, H., Elsum, I. R., Bursztyn, M., & Fulton, E. A. (2020). Expertise in Research Integration and Implementation for Tackling Complex Problems: When is it Needed, Where Can it be Found and How can it be Strengthened? Palgrave Communication, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0

• Barnett, M. N., Pevehouse, J. C. W., & Raustiala, K. (2021). Introduction: The Modes of Global Governance. In M. N. Barnett, J. C. W. Pevehouse, & K. Raustiala (Eds.), Global Governance in a World of Change (pp. 1–47). Cambridge University Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Biermann, F., Hickmann, T., & Sénit, C. A. (Eds.). (2022). The Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals. Transforming Governance through Global Goals? Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kima, R. E. (2017). Global Governance by Goal-Setting: The Novel Approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bolton, J. (2000). Should we Take Global Governance Seriously? Chicago Journal of International Law, 1(2), 205–221.

  Google Scholar 

• Boulding, K. E. (1966). The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In H. E. Daly (Ed.), Toward a steady-State Economy (pp. 121–132). W.H. Freeman and Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Brand, U. (2003). Nach der Krise des Fordismus. Global Governance als möglicher hegemonialer Diskurs des internationalen Politischen. Zeitschrift Für Internationale Beziehungen, 1, 143–166.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brand, U. (2005). Order and Regulation: Global Governance as a Hegemonic Discourse of International Politics? Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 155–176.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brand, U. (2016). Transformation” as a New Critical Orthodoxy. The Strategic Use of the Term “Transformation. Does Not Prevent Multiple Crises. GAIA, 25(1), 23–27.

  Google Scholar 

• Brand, U., Brunnengräber, A., Schrader, L., Stock, C., & Wahl, P. (2000). Global Governance. Alternative zur neoliberalen Globalisierung? Westfälisches Dampfboot.

  Google Scholar 

• Cash, D. W., & Belloy, P. G. (2019). Salience, Credibility and Legitimacy in a Rapidly Shifting World of Knowledge and Action. Sustainability, 12(18), 7376, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187376

• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity.

  Google Scholar 

• Chakrabarty, D. (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. The University of Chicago Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Colloff, M. J., Martín-Lópezc, B., Lavoreld, S., Locatellie, B., Goddard, R., Longarettig, P.-Y., Walters, G., van Kerkhoff, L., Wyborn, C., Coreau, A., & Wise, R. M. (2017). An Integrative Research Framework for Enabling Transformative Adaptation. Environmental Science & Policy, 68, 87–96.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Crary, J. (2022a). Scorched Earth. Beyond the Digital Age to a Post-Capitalist World. Verso Books.

  Google Scholar 

• CLCS. (1999). CLCS/11—Scientific and Technical Guidelines of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf. Adopted by the Commission 13. May 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Crary, J. (2022b). Scorched Earth: Beyond the Digital Age to a Post-Capitalist World. Verso.

  Google Scholar 

• de Castro, F., Hogenboom, B., & Baud, M. (2016). Environmental Governance in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Dellmuth, L., Scholte, I. A., Tallberg, J., & Verhaegen, S. (2022). Citizens, Elites, and the Legitimacy of Global Governance. Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Eversberg, D., Koch, P., Lehmann, R., Saltelli, A., Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Kovacic, Z. (2023). The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Promises of Bioeconomy and the Economy of Promises. Sustainability Science, 18, 557–568.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fioretos, O., & Tallberg, J. (2021). Politics and Theory of Global Governance. International Theory, 13, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000408

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Folke, C., Polasky Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., & Seto, K. C. (2021). Our Future in the Anthropocene Biosphere. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-0154-8

• Fraser, N. (2023 [2022]). Cannibal Capitalism. Verso.

  Google Scholar 

• Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Emergent Complex Systems. Futures, 26(6), 568–582.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Geiselberger, H. (Ed.). (2017). Die Große Regression. Eine internationale Debatte über die geistige Situation der Zeit. Suhrkamp.

  Google Scholar 

• Görg, G. C., Plank, C., Wiedenhofer, D., Mayer, A., Pichler, M., Schaffartzik, K., & F. (2020). Scrutinizing the Great Acceleration: The Anthropocene and its Analytic Challenges for Social-Ecological Transformations. The Anthropocene Review, 7(1), 42–61.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graefe, S. (2019). Resilienz im Krisenkapitalismus. Wider das Lob der Anpassungsfähigkeit. Transcript Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• IPCC. (2022). Summary for Policymakers (pp. 3–33). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.001

• Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (Eds.). (2017). Governing through Goals: Sustainable Development Goals as Governance Innovation. MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Latif, M. (2023 [2022]). Countdown. Unsere Zeit läuft ab – was wir der Klimakatatstrophe noch entgegensetzen können. Goldmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Lovink, G. (2023). Internetdämmerung. Über das Ende der Netzkulturen wie wir sie kennen. Lettre International, Frühjahr, 2023, 47–52.

  Google Scholar 

• Martínez-Alier, J., Unai Pascual, U., Franck-Dominique Vivien, F.-D., & Zaccai, E. (2010). Sustainable De-growth: Mapping the Context, Criticisms and Future Prospects of an Emergent Paradigm. Ecological Economics, 69, 1741–1747.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mau, S., Lux, T., & Westheuser, L. (2023). Triggerpunkte. Konsens und Konflikt in der Gegenwartsgesellschaft. Suhrkamp.

  Google Scholar 

• Morin, E., & Kern, A. B. (1999). Homeland Earth: A Manifesto for the New Millenium. Hampton Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nachtwey, O. (2016). Die Abstiegsgesellschaft. Über das Aufbegehren in der regressiven Moderne. Suhrkamp.

  Google Scholar 

• Nida-Rümelin, J. (2020). Die gefährdete Rationalität der Demokratie: Ein politischer Traktat. Edition Körber.

  Google Scholar 

• Nuscheler, F. (2006 [2004]). Entwicklungspolitik. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.

  Google Scholar 

• Pereira, Â., & Funtowicz, S. (Eds.). (2015). The End of the Cartesian Dream. Routledge’s Series: Explorations in Sustainability and Governance. Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Pichler, M. (2023). Political Dimensions of Social-Ecological Transformations: Polity, Politics, Policy. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 19(1), 2222612. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2023.222261

• Poto, M. P., Kuhn, A., Tsiouvalas, A., Hodgson, K. K., Treffenfeldt, M. V., & Beitl, C. M. (2021). Knowledge Integration and Good Marine Governance: A Multidisciplinary Analysis and Critical Synopsis. Human Ecology, 50, 125–139.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Randle, M., & Eckersley, R. (2015). Public Perceptions of Future Threats to Humanity and Different Societal Responses: A Cross-National Study. Futures, 72, 4–16.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ravetz, J. R. (1987). Usable Knowledge, Usable Ignorance, Incomplete Science with Policy Implications. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 9(1), 87–116.

  Google Scholar 

• Reckwitz, A. (2012). Die Erfindung der Kreativität. Zum Prozess gesellschaftlicher Ästhetisierung. Suhrkamp.

  Google Scholar 

• Reckwitz, A. (2019). Das Ende der Illusionen. Suhrkamp.

  Google Scholar 

• Renn, O. (2021). Transdisciplinarity: Synthesis Towards a Modular Approach. Futures, 130, 102744.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rome, A. (2015). The Launch of Spaceship Earth. Nature, 527, 443–445.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rosa, H. (2019). Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp.

  Google Scholar 

• Scheidel, A., Temper, L., Demaria, F., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2018). Ecological Distribution Conflicts as Forces for Sustainability. An Overview and Conceptual Framework. Sustainability Science, 13, 585–598.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schneider, F., Patel, Z., Paulavets, K., Buser, T., Kkado, J., & Burkhart, S. (2023). Fostering Transdisciplinary Research for Sustainability in the Global South: Pathways to Impact for Funding Programmes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication, 10, 620. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02138-3

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schneidewind, I. (2013). Transformative Literacy. Gesellschaftliche Veränderungsprozesse Verstehen Und Gestalten. GAIA, 22(2), 82–86.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schneidewind, U. (2019 [2018]). Die große Transformation. Eine Einführung in die Kunst des gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Fischer.

  Google Scholar 

• Storm, S. (2009). Capitalism and Climate Change: Can the Invisible Hand Adjust the Natural Thermostat? Development and Change, 40(6), 1011–1038.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stupak, I., Mansoor, M., & Tattersall Smith, C. (2021). Conceptual Framework for Increasing Legitimacy and Trust of Sustainability Governance. Energy, Sustainability, Society, 11, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00280-x

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, E. W., & Cranton, P. (2012). The Handbook of Transformative Learning. Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Volkmer, M., & Werner, K. (Eds). (2020). Die Corona-Gesellschaft. Analysen zur Lage und Verlag.Perspektiven für die Zukunft. Transcript.

  Google Scholar 

• Walz, K. (2016). Entwicklung und Stand der Debatte: Transformationsforschung im deutschen Kontext. Universität Hamburg: Global Transformations Towards a Low Carbon Society (Working Paper 11, 2016).

  Google Scholar 

• Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., & Bodan, Ö. (2013). A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327

• Zuboff, S. (1988). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.

  Google Scholar 

• Zürn, M. (2018). A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

Download references