Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Democracy, News Media, and Religion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Democratic Approach to Religion News

  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter sets the ground and provides broader legitimacy for the proposed democratic approach to newspaper religion reporting and the questions this research seeks to answer. To this end, it explores three of the four-layer rationale for it. In the first layer, the attitude of democracy to the news media, civil society, and religion, I discuss leading twentieth-century models or ideal types of democracy and a few contemporary models or hybrid types of democracy, beginning with the model that assigns the most limited role to the news media and civil society, part of which is religion, and finishing with the most sophisticated model—monitory democracy for which I make a case. In each model’s review, I pay closer attention to its central tenets, the roles assigned to the news media, civil society, and religion. In the second layer, I examine the news media’s attitude to and roles in democracy. I complete the discussion of the wider framework for this research by considering the third layer or the attitude of religion and religious citizens to democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Their study investigates TV news in nine countries, using content analysis and surveys. However, the US and Norway were not part of the content analysis that examined news sources.

References

  • Aalberg, T., & Curran, J. (2012a). Conclusion. In T. Aalberg & J. Curran (Eds.), How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach (pp. 189–199). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aalberg, T., & Curran, J. (2012b). How Media Inform Democracy: Central Debates. In T. Aalberg & J. Curran (Eds.), How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach (pp. 3–14). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, I. (2015). In Conversation with John Keane: Gods, Power, Democracy. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, 1(1), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (2006). The Civil Sphere. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, S. (2023). Introduction: The Value(s) of Truth-Seeking in News and Journalism. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism (2nd ed., pp. 1–13). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. J. (2007a). Challenges for Journalism. In P. J. Anderson & G. Ward (Eds.), The Future of Journalism in the Advanced Democracies (pp. 51–69). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. J. (2007b). Competing Models of Journalism and Democracy. In P. J. Anderson & G. Ward (Eds.), The Future of Journalism in the Advanced Democracies (pp. 39–49). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. J., Weymouth, A., & with Ward, G. (2007). The Changing World of Journalism. In P. J. Anderson & G. Ward (Eds.), The Future of Journalism in the Advanced Democracies (pp. 17–37). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, R. S. (2000). The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. E. (2002). Media, Markets, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2011). Religion-Friendly Democracy and Democracy-Friendly Religion. The Guardian. Retrieved June 1, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2011/nov/11/tony-blair-democracy-friendly-religion

  • Bloom, P. B.-N., & Arikan, G. (2012a). A Two-Edged Sword: The Differential Effect of Religious Belief and Religious Social Context on Attitudes Towards Democracy. Political Behavior, 34(2), 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. B.-N., & Arikan, G. (2012b). Priming Religious Belief and Religious Social Behavior Affects Support for Democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 368–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. B.-N., & Arikan, G. (2013). Religion and Support for Democracy: A Cross-National Test of the Mediating Mechanisms. British Journal of Political Science, 43(02), 375–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. W. (2002). Preface. Journal of Media and Religion, 1(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1997). Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 407–437). MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly-Ahern, C., & Golan, G. J. (2007). Press Freedom and Religion: Measuring the Association between Press Freedom and Religious Composition. Journal of Media and Religion, 6(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, S. (2000). Rethinking News Access. Journalism Studies, 1(3), 427–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, F. (2002). Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., et al. (2014). Reconsidering ‘Virtuous Circle’ and ‘Media Malaise’ Theories of the Media: An 11-Nation Study. Journalism, 15(7), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913520198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1985). A Preface to Economic Democracy. Polity.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FH. (2015). Freedom in the World 2015. Freedom House. Retrieved April 27, 2015, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015#.VT6JfJ1waUk

  • Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B. (1997). Newszak and News Media. Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, T. L., & Lee, F. L. F. (2002). Repositioning the Newsroom: The American Experience with Public Journalism. In R. Kuhn & E. Neveu (Eds.), Political Journalism: New Challenges, New Practices (pp. 203–225). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (2023). The Political Economy of Contemporary Journalism and the Crisis of Public Knowledge. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism (2nd ed., pp. 36–45). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, N., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2014). Democratic Demands on the Media. In B. Pfetsch (Ed.), Political Communication Cultures in Europe: Attitudes of Political Actors and Journalists in Nine Countries (pp. 126–147). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, K. (2016). Beyond Belief: Freedom of Expression| Ernie Rea (presenter)| Ed Condon, Barry Kleinberg and Khola Hassan (guest speakers)| 13 June 2016. BBC Radio 4 [Online]. Retrieved December 20, 2016, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07ffj3h

  • Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, V. F. (2010). Civil Society Indicators and Indexes. In H. K. Anheier, S. Toepler, & R. A. List (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 376–380). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy (3rd ed.). Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S. (1992). Beyond Hypocrisy: Decoding the News in an Age of Propaganda Including the Doublespeak Dictionary. South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1984). Will More Countries Become Democratic? Political Science Quarterly, 99(2), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karppinen, K. (2013). Uses of Democratic Theory in Media and Communication Studies. Observatorio, 7(3), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2009a). Monitory Democracy and Media-Saturated Societies. Griffith Review, 24, 79–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2009b). The Future of Representative Democracy. Universitat Jaume I. Retrieved August 9, 2018, from http://www.svideo.uji.es/peli.php?codi=316&lg=

  • Keane, J. (2010a). Civil Society, Definitions and Approaches. In H. K. Anheier, S. Toepler, & R. A. List (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 461–464). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2010b). The Life and Death of Democracy. Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2013a). Civil Society in the Era of Monitory Democracy. In L. Tragårdh, N. Witoszek, & B. Taylor (Eds.), Civil Society in the Age of Monitory Democracy (pp. 22–51). Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2013b). Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2014). Lecture: The New Despotisms of the 21st Century. Middle East Monitor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2018). Power and Humility: The Future of Monitory Democracy. eBook: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2022). The Shortest History of Democracy. eBook: Old Street Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatab, S., & Bouma, G. D. (2007). Democracy in Islam. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuru, A. T. (2014). Authoritarianism and Democracy in Muslim Countries: Rentier States and Regional Diffusion. Political Science Quarterly, 129(3), 399–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., Inthorn, S., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2005). Citizens or Consumers? What the Media Tell Us About Political Participation. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, G. (1996). Religion and the Rise of Democracy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J., Hamilton, A., & Jay, J. (1961). The Federalist Papers. New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, B. (2008). Journalism and Democracy. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 237–249). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, B. (2009). News and Journalism in the UK (5th ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T., & Hinchman, L. P. (2002). Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R. E. (2023). The So-Called ‘Crisis’ of Trust in Journalism. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism (2nd ed., pp. 55–63). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, L. (2014). Comparing Mass Media in Established Democracies: Patterns of Media Performance. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstreng, K. (2000). Media and Democracy: What Is Really Required? In J. van Cuilenburg & R. van der Wurff (Eds.), Media and Open Societies: Cultural, Economic and Policy Foundations for Media Openness in East and West (pp. 29–47). Het Spinhuis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polat, R. K., & Pratchett, L. (2014). Citizenship in the Age of the Internet: A Comparative Analysis of Britain and Turkey. Citizenship Studies, 18(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puga, C. (2010). Civil Society Theory: Keane. In H. K. Anheier, S. Toepler, & R. A. List (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 425–430). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiqi, A. (2019). A Clash of Civilizations? Muslims, Christians, and Preferences for Democracy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 58(3), 689–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. K., & Smith, N. (2009). Islam’s Democracy Paradox: Muslims Claim to Like Democracy, So Why Do They Have So Little? Public Choice, 139(3-4), 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayyid, S. (2005). Mirror, Mirror Western Democrats, Oriental Despots? Ethnicities, 5(1), 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (2003). The Sociology of News. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (2005). Four Approaches to the Sociology of News. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass Media and Society (4th ed., pp. 172��197). Hodder Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, A. C. (2001). The World’s Religious Systems and Democracy: Crafting the ‘Twin Tolerations’. In A. C. Stepan (Ed.), Arguing Comparative Politics (pp. 213–253). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, D. A., & Buddenbaum, J. M. (2008). Approaches to the Study of Media and Religion: Notes from the Editors of the Journal of Media and Religion with Recommendations for Future Research. Religion, 38(3), 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struhl, K. J. (2007). Is Democracy a Universal Value? Whose Democracy? Radical Philosophy Today, 5, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (2011). Religion and Modern Society: Citizenship, Secularisation, and the State. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Schnitzler, A. (2008). Liberalism. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (Vol. 4, 2nd ed., pp. 425–427). Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1946). Politics as a Vocation. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 77–128). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. Talcott Parsons. Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIN/Gallup International. (2015). Global Views on Democracy. Retrieved December 15, 2019, from https://www.gallup-international.bg/en/34065/global-views-on-democracy/

  • Woolley, P. (2012). A Relationship Worth Getting Right. In J. Mitchell & O. Gower (Eds.), Religion and the News (pp. 61–75). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2000). Democracy and Inclusion. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. (2003). A New Standard of News Quality: Burglar Alarms for the Monitorial Citizen. Political Communication, 20(2), 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanetti, L. A. (2007). Democratic Theory. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Governance (Vol. 1, pp. 207–212). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B., Boczkowski, P. J., & Anderson, C. W. (2022). The Journalism Manifesto. eBook: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Journalism, Media & Culture, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Ahmed Topkev

Authors
  1. Ahmed Topkev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Topkev .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Topkev, A. (2024). Democracy, News Media, and Religion. In: A Democratic Approach to Religion News. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49519-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation