Skip to main content

Ethics in the Practice and Management of Male Aesthetic Patient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Comprehensive Guide to Male Aesthetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery

Abstract

The number of aesthetic procedures in plastic surgery has grown exponentially and now accounts for more than half of all interventions in plastic surgery. A total of 13.5 million cosmetic procedures were performed in 2020 in the United States alone, of which only 8% were performed on male patients. In this chapter, we attempt to explore the ethical implications of male cosmetic surgery, provide an overview of its guiding principles, and discuss special population considerations. The second part of this chapter highlights the specific management of male cosmetic patients, examines cultural implications, and discusses management in different settings: the impact of social media on patients, body dysmorphic disorders, and a selection of hypothetical patients’ cases. Male cosmetic patients are a population that displays their own set of characteristics and requires specific consideration and approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Statistics Report 2020:5. 2020. Accessed 08/30/2021. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2020.pdf

  2. Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. Statistics Report. 2017:3. 2017. Accessed 05/15/2022. https://d2wirczt3b6wjm.cloudfront.net/News/Statistics/2016/2016-plastic-surgery-statistics-report.pdf

  3. Dumont EA. [Sir Harold D. Gillies, pioneer of plastic surgery]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;160:A9547. Sir Harold Gillies, pionier van plastische chirurgie.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rohrich RJ. The man as a cosmetic surgery patient: the weaker sex? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(7):2098–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200112000-00042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Indla V, Radhika MS. Hippocratic oath: Losing relevance in today's world? Indian J Psychiatry. 2019;61(Suppl. 4):S773–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_140_19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandal J, Ponnambath DK, Parija SC. Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine. Trop Parasitol. 2016;6(1):5–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.175024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Misselbrook D. Duty, Kant, and deontology. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(609):211. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X665422.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mousavi SR. The ethics of aesthetic surgery. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2010;3(1):38–40. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.63396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eaton MM. Merit. Aesthetic and ethical: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gallo L, Baxter C, Murphy J, Schwartz L, Thoma A. Ethics in plastic surgery: applying the four common principles to practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3):813–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nejadsarvari N, Ebrahimi A, Ebrahimi A, Hashem-Zade H. Medical ethics in plastic surgery: a mini review. World J Plast Surg. 2016;5(3):207–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarwer DB, Grossbart TA, Didie ER. Beauty and society. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003;22(2):79–92. https://doi.org/10.1053/sder.2003.50014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rohrich RJ, Cho MJ. when is teenage plastic surgery versus cosmetic surgery okay? Reality versus hype: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(3):293e–302e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh K. Cosmetic surgery in teenagers: to do or not to do. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015;8(1):57–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.155091.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Latham J. Ethical issues in considering transsexual surgeries as aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2013;37(3):648–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0100-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubov A, Fraenkel L. Facial feminization surgery: the ethics of gatekeeping in transgender health. Am J Bioeth. 2018;18(12):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1531159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hann M, Ivester R, Denton GD. Bioethics in practice: ethical issues in the care of transgender patients. Ochsner J Summer. 2017;17(2):144–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lichtenstein M, Stein L, Connolly E, et al. The Mount Sinai patient-centered preoperative criteria meant to optimize outcomes are less of a barrier to care than WPATH SOC 7 criteria before transgender-specific surgery. Transgend Health. 2020;5(3):166–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2019.0066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Selvaggi G, Dhejne C, Landen M, Elander A. The 2011 WPATH standards of care and penile reconstruction in female-to-male transsexual individuals. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:581712. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/581712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Roger S. Beauty: a very short introduction. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Why SR, Matters B. Monist. 2018;101(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onx031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morales RGHR. The idea of beauty is always shifting. Today, it’s more inclusive than ever. Essay National Geographic Magazine 07/01/2020 2020;February 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shaye DA. The science of art: Leonardo Da Vinci and facial plastic surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;28(4):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0000000000000643.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Danikas D, Panagopoulos G. The golden ratio and proportions of beauty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(4):1009. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000138702.13724.26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh P, Vijayan R, Mosahebi A. The Golden ratio and aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(1):Np4–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Simonova M. The ideal man: male beauty standards through history. 2021. https://www.thecollector.com/idealized-man-male-beauty-standards-through-history/

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maisey DS, Vale EL, Cornelissen PL, Tovée MJ. Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. Lancet. 1999;353(9163):1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00438-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Naigaga DA, Jahanlu D, Claudius HM, Gjerlaug AK, Barikmo I, Henjum S. Body size perceptions and preferences favor overweight in adult Saharawi refugees. Nutr J. 2018;17(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-018-0330-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Li B, Anderson MJ. Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: sexual preferences of men and women in China. Am J Hum Biol. 2007;19(1):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abbas OL. Analysis of the factors affecting men’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery: body image, media exposure, social network use, masculine gender role stress and religious attitudes. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41:1454–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0882-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M, Tantleff-Dunn S. Exacting beauty: theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance, vol. xii. American Psychological Association; 1999. 396-xii

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Statistics. 2017. https://www.theaestheticsociety.org/media/procedural-statistics

  33. Code of Ethics of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/Governance/asps-code-of-ethics.pdf

  34. Greenberg JL, Weingarden H, Wilhelm S. A practical guide to managing body dysmorphic disorder in the cosmetic surgery setting. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(3):181–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Regier DA, Kuhl EA, Kupfer DJ. The DSM-5: classification and criteria changes. World Psychiatry. 2013;12(2):92–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20050.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sweis IE, Spitz J, Barry DR, Cohen M. A review of body dysmorphic disorder in aesthetic surgery patients and the legal implications. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41(4):949–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0819-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Crerand CE, Phillips KA, Menard W, Fay C. Nonpsychiatric medical treatment of body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics. 2005;46(6):549–55. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.46.6.549.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Veale D, Boocock A, Gournay K, et al. Body dysmorphic disorder. A survey of fifty cases. Br J Psychiatry. 1996;169(2):196–201. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.169.2.196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Alsaidan MS, Altayar NS, Alshmmari SH, Alshammari MM, Alqahtani FT, Mohajer KA. The prevalence and determinants of body dysmorphic disorder among young social media users: a cross-sectional study. Dermatol Rep. 2020;12(3):8774. https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2020.8774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sandman L, Hansson E. An ethics analysis of the rationale for publicly funded plastic surgery. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00539-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Terris-Feldman A, Chen A, Poudrier G, Garcia M. How accessible is genital gender-affirming surgery for transgender patients with commercial and public health insurance in the United States? Results of a patient-modeled search for services and a survey of providers. Sex Med. 2020;8(4):664–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2020.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Clevens RA, Prendiville S. Reflections on aesthetic facial surgery in men. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2009;17(4):613–24., vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2009.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bulstrode NW, Waterhouse N, Forrester P. Male aesthetic patients to avoid, SLAP-SIMON. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(1):452. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000233628.59721.f4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Saeed K, Khan FA, Khan I, Farid A. Psychology behind aesthetic rhinoplasty—introducing the term "SIFON". J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(6):2152–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000007496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Adamson P, Chen T. The dangerous dozen—avoiding potential problem patients in cosmetic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am. 2008;16:195–202., vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2007.11.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gillanders SL, Walsh M, Anderson S, Abdulrahman S. Gender specific considerations in septorhinoplasty, a retrospective observational study and review of the literature. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;78:103810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Parsa KM, Gao W, Lally J, Davison SP, Reilly MJ. Evaluation of personality perception in men before and after facial cosmetic surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(5):369–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Grijalva E, Newman DA, Tay L, et al. Gender differences in narcissism: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2015;141(2):261–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(606):e76–84. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13X660814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Beckman HB, Frankel RM. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101(5):692–6. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-101-5-692.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wright MR. The male aesthetic patient. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(7):724–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1987.01860070038012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel J. Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alvarez, A.H., Foppiani, J., Lin, S.J. (2024). Ethics in the Practice and Management of Male Aesthetic Patient. In: Thaller, S.R., Cohen, M.N. (eds) A Comprehensive Guide to Male Aesthetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48503-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48503-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48502-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48503-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics