Abstract
The use of ultrasound guidance is increasingly popular for interventional pain management and has been demonstrated to be superior to landmark based injections. Proper knowledge of the mechanisms by which this technology works is essential for the success of ultrasound-guided procedures and allows for the maximum utility this technology offers. There are different types of probes depending on the objective that is required, the higher the frequency, the more the attenuation; lower frequency probes (2–5 MHz) are used to visualize deeper structures, higher frequency probes (5–18 MHz) are most often used for superficial structures. Regarding the procedures, there is nomenclature that describes the ultrasound probe-to-target orientation and the probe-to-needle disposition. The position and comfort of the doctor are very important when performing a procedure. Ultrasound is a tool that helps us to identify the target with the surrounding tissues, being able to observe the soft tissue and vascular structures which cannot be identified when procedures are performed with fluoroscopy. This chapter will discuss the fundamentals of ultrasound science and technology for the interventional pain physician.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Candido KD, Chang Chien GC. Ultrasound basics. In: Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Falco FJE, Hirsch JA, editors. Essentials of interventional techniques in managing chronic spinal pain. New York, NY: Springer; 2018. p. 445–50.
Sharpe RE, Nazarian LN, Parker L, et al. Dramatically increased musculoskeletal ultrasound utilization from 2000 to 2009, especially by podiatrists in private offices. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9:141–6.
Parker L, Nazarian LN, Carrino JA, et al. Musculoskeletal imaging: Medicare use, costs, and potential for cost substitution. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5:182–8.
Ahmed R, Nazarian LN. Overview of musculoskeletal sonography. Ultrasound Q. 2010;26:27–35.
Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD011447.
Aly AR, Rajasekaran S, Ashworth N. Ultrasound-guided shoulder girdle injections are more accurate and more effective than landmark-guided injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:1042–9.
Bhatia A, Gofeld M, Ganapathy S, et al. Comparison of anatomic landmarks and ultrasound guidance for intercostal nerve injections in cadavers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:503–7.
Bae JH, Park YS, Chang HJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial for efficacy of capsular distension for adhesive capsulitis: fluoroscopy-guided anterior versus ultrasonography-guided posterolateral approach. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014;38:360–8.
Kim YH, Park HJ, Moon DE. Ultrasound-guided pararadicular injection in the lumbar spine: a comparative study of the paramedian sagittal and paramedian sagittal oblique approaches. Pain Pract. 2015;15:693–700.
Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Meenagh G, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist VII. Ultrasound imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:5–10.
de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, et al. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1701–7.
Grassi W, Filippucci E, Carotti M, et al. Imaging modalities for identifying the origin of regional musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17:17–32.
McDermott JD, Ilyas AM, Nazarian LN, et al. Ultrasound-guided injections for de Quervain's tenosynovitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:1925–31.
Allison SJ, Nazarian LN. Musculoskeletal ultrasound: evaluation of ankle tendons and ligaments. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:W514.
Ghozlan R, Vacher H. Where is imaging going in rheumatology? Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000;14:617���33.
Grassi W, Cervini C. Ultrasonography in rheumatology: an evolving technique. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57:268–71.
Naredo E, Aguado P, De Miguel E, et al. Painful shoulder: comparison of physical examination and ultrasonographic findings. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:132–6.
Zbojniewicz AM. US for diagnosis of musculoskeletal conditions in the young athlete: emphasis on dynamic assessment. Radiographics. 2014;34:1145–62.
Konin GP, Nazarian LN, Walz DM. US of the elbow: indications, technique, normal anatomy, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics. 2013;33:E125–47.
Nazarian LN. The top 10 reasons musculoskeletal sonography is an important complementary or alternative technique to MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1621–6.
Khoury V, Cardinal E, Bureau NJ. Musculoskeletal sonography: a dynamic tool for usual and unusual disorders. AJR. 2007;188:W63–73.
Boesen MI, Boesen M, Langberg H, et al. Musculoskeletal colour/power Doppler in sports medicine: image parameters, artefacts, image interpretation and therapy. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:103–13.
Acknowledgments
This book chapter is modified and updated from a previous book chapter, “Ultrasound Basics” by Kenneth D. Candido, MD, and George C. Chang Chien, DO, in Essentials of Interventional Techniques in Managing Chronic Spinal Pain published by Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silva-Ortiz, V.M., Chang Chien, G.C., Candido, K.D. (2024). Ultrasound Basics. In: Singh, V., Falco, F.J., Kaye, A.D., Soin, A., Hirsch, J.A. (eds) Essentials of Interventional Techniques in Managing Chronic Pain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46217-7_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46217-7_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-46216-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-46217-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)