Type 1 Research: Phenomenology, Definition, Classification, and Foundation

• Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Wittig, B. A. (1969). Attachment and exploratory behaviour of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Determinants of infant behaviour. Methuen

  Google Scholar 

• Amsel, E., Langer, R., & Loutzenhiser, L. (2014). Do lawyers reason differently from psychologists? A comparative design for studying expertise. In Complex problem solving (pp. 223–250). Psychology Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193–224.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain sciences, 11(2), 169–183.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bornstein, M. H. (1989). Sensitive periods in development: structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 179–197.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568–586.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. K. (1986). A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(3), 255–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Charness, N., Clifton, J., & MacDonald, L. (1988). Case study of a musical “mono-savant”: A cognitive-psychological focus. The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities. Guilford Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Cotterill, S. (2015). Preparing for performance: strategies adopted across performance domains. The Sport Psychologist, 29(2), 158–170.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.

  Google Scholar 

• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 185–199.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Current theory and research in motivation. University of Nebraska Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenager. Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y. (2013). The nature-nurture debate regarding high potential: beyond dichotomous thinking. In Confronting dogmatism in gifted education. Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y. (2017). Envisioning a new foundation for gifted education: Evolving Complexity Theory (ECT) of talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 172–182.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y. (2021). Evolving complexity theory (ECT) of talent development: A new vision for gifted and talented education. Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent, 99–122.

  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y. (2024). The nature and nurture of talent: A new foundation for education and optimal human development. Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 151–168.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y., & Coleman, L. J. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on nature, nurture, and the development of exceptional competence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3–4), 254–269.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S. (2008). Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 114–130.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dai, D. Y., & Speerschneider, K. (2012). Cope and grow: A model of affective curriculum for talent development. Talent Development & Excellence, 4(2), 181–199.

  Google Scholar 

• de Groot, A. (1978). Thought and choice in chess. Mouton. (Original work published 1946).

  Google Scholar 

• DeHaan, R. G., & Havighurst, R. J. (1957). Educating the gifted. University of Chicago press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Free Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Duckworth, A. L. (2006). Intelligence is not enough: Non-IQ predictors of achievement. University of Pennsylvania.

  Google Scholar 

• Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. American Psychological Association.

  Google Scholar 

• Eaton, J., Williams, D., & Miranda, E. (2015). The space between us: evaluating a multi-user affective brain-computer music interface. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 2(2��3), 103–116.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, K. A. (2001). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In The pursuit of excellence through education. Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2005). Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 287–311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, K. A., Nandagopal, K., & Roring, R. W. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3–55.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, K. A., & Ward, P. (2007). Capturing the naturally occurring superior performance of experts in the laboratory: Toward a science of expert and exceptional performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 346–350.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ericsson, K. A., & Williams, A. M. (2007). Capturing naturally occurring superior performance in the laboratory: translational research on expert performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(3), 115–123.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Feldman, D. H. (1974). Universal to unique: A developmental view of creativity and education. In S. Rosner & L. Abt (Eds.), Essays in creativity. North River Press

  Google Scholar 

• Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Gagné, F. (1999). Nature or nurture? A re-examination of Sloboda and Howe’s (1991) interview study on talent development in music. Psychology of Music, 27(1), 38–51.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, second edition. Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. Macmillan.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(27), 9240–9245.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gaudreau, P., Amiot, C. E., & Vallerand, R. J. (2009). Trajectories of affective states in adolescent hockey players: Turning point and motivational antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 307–319.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gee, J. P. (2007). What Video Games have to Teach Us about Learning and Language, 2nd ed. Palgrave.

  Google Scholar 

• Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology. MIT press.

  Google Scholar 

• Glaveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E., … & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio-cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745.

  Google Scholar 

• Glaveanu, V. P., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., De Biaisi, P. M., Desainte-Catherine, M., … & Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: Findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 40417.

  Google Scholar 

• Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105(4), 792–802.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gottlieb, G. (2007). Probabilistic epigenesis. Developmental Science, 10, 1–11.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Gray, W. D., & Lindstedt, J. K. (2017). Plateau, dips, and leaps: Where to look for inventions and discoveries during skilled performance. Cognitive Science, 41, 1838–1870.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Haier, R. J. (2001). PET studies of learning and individual differences. In J. L. McClelland & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Haier, R. J., White, N. S., & Alkire, M. T. (2003). Individual differences in general intelligence correlate with brain function during nonreasoning tasks. Intelligence, 31(5), 429–441.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haraldsen, H. M., Nordin-Bates, S. M., Abrahamsen, F. E., & Halvari, H. (2020). Thriving, striving, or just surviving? TD learning conditions, motivational processes and well-being among Norwegian elite performers in music, ballet, and sport. Roeper Review, 42(2), 109–125.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hatano, G. (1988). Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. In G. B. Saxe & M. Gearhart (Eds.), Children’s mathematics. Jossey-Bass

  Google Scholar 

• Kagan, J. (2002). Surprise, uncertainty, and mental structures. Harvard University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Kanevsky, L. (1990). Pursuing qualitative differences in the flexible use of problem-solving strategy by young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 115–140.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kanevsky, L. (2020). Tannenbaum’s psychosocial conception of giftedness. In T. L. Cross, & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Conceptual frameworks for giftedness and talent development. Prufrock Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kellogg, R. T. (2006). Professional writing expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 250–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Knowles, A. M., & Lorimer, R. (2014). A case study of an athlete’s experience of multiple change-events moving between team and individual sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 26(2), 197–210.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kozbelt, A., & Meredith, D. (2010). A note on trans-historical melodic originality trends in classical music. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 20(2), 109–125.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Capra, R. (2022, March). Analyzing information resources that support the creative process. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval.

  Google Scholar 

• Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2021). Intellectual precocity: What have we learned since Terman? Gifted Child Quarterly, 65, 3–28.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, R. E. (2005). The scientific study of giftedness. Conceptions of Giftedness, 2, 437–447.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McPherson, G. E., & Williamon, A. (2016). Building gifts into musical talents. In G. E. McPherson (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (2nd ed.). Oxford University

  Google Scholar 

• Press Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Talent. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved August 31, 2023, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/talent

• Miller, A. I. (1996). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. Springer-Verlag.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Miller, L. K. (2005). What the savant syndrome can tell us about the nature and nurture of talent. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 361–373.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Obler, L. K., & Fein, D. E. (1988). The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities. Guilford Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Renzulli, J. S. (2011). What makes giftedness?: Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(8), 81–88.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Renzulli, J. S. (2021). The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model for Promoting Creative Productivity 4. In Reflections on gifted education. Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Robinson, A., & Jolly, J. L. (Eds.). (2014). A century of contributions to gifted education: Illuminating lives. Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Rose, T. (2016). The end of average: How we succeed in a world that values sameness. HarperOne.

  Google Scholar 

• Russ, S. W., & American Psychological Association. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. American Psychological Association.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Salas, E., & Klein, G. A. (Eds.). (2001). Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making. Psychology Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sawyer, R. K. (1999). The emergence of creativity. Philosophical psychology, 12(4), 447–469.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Improved dialogues: Emergence and creativity in conversation. Greenwood.

  Google Scholar 

• Sawyer, R.K. (2012). The science of human innovation: explaining creativity (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. In The Improvisation Studies Reader. Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Sawyer, R. K. & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and Arts, 3, 81–92.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schlaug, G. (2001). The brain of musicians: A model for functional and structural adaptation. In R. J. Zatorre & I. Peretz (Eds.), The biological foundations of music (Annals of the New York Academy Sciences) (Vol. 930). New York Academy of Sciences.

  Google Scholar 

• Shavinina, L. (2004). Explaining high abilities of Nobel laureates. High Ability Studies, 15, 243–254.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shavinina, L. (2010). What does research on child prodigies tell us about talent development and expertise acquisition. Talent Development & Excellence, 29(2), 29–49.

  Google Scholar 

• Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). The mechanisms and boundary conditions of the Einstellung effect in chess: evidence from eye movements. PloS One, 8(10), e75796.

  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research?. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 251–267.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104(1), 66–89.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106(3), 435–457.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stanley, J. C. (1997). Varieties of Intellectual talent 1. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(2), 93–119.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise. Conceptions of giftedness, 343–357.

  Google Scholar 

• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. Macmillan

  Google Scholar 

• Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R.J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Tannenbaum, A. J. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon, Incorporated.

  Google Scholar 

• Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). A history of giftedness in school and society. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed.). Elsevier.

  Google Scholar 

• Tannenbaum, A. J. (2009). Defining, determining, discovering, and developing excellence. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, & C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted & talented. Creative Learning Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wagstaff, C. R. (2014). Emotion regulation and sport performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 401–412.

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Modes of expertise in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press

  Google Scholar 

• Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Witty P. A. (1958). Who are the gifted? In Henry N. B. (Ed.), Education of the gifted. 57th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part 2. Crossref.

  Google Scholar 

Download references