Abstract
The Human Rights Model of Disability asserts that every person, including those with disabilities, deserves their human rights and dignity protected by the law. It emerged in the 2000s as an attempt to address the critique of the social model of disability introduced in the 1980s during the rise of disability rights activism. This chapter, therefore, uses an analysis of the relevant scientific literature on the human rights and other disability models, including review articles, as a main source. It also takes into account international human rights law documents, such as main human rights treaties and reports.
The first part outlines the emergence of the Human Rights Model of Disability. It briefly discusses the history of the disability model concept, the development of the specific term for the Human Rights Model of Disability, and points out the lack of consistency in how both scholars and human rights practitioners address this model nowadays. The second section explains the scope and role of the Human Rights Model of Disability, emphasizing its focus on design and implementation of disability policy, rather than on the concept of disability. The third part describes the six main characteristics of the Human Rights Model of Disability. These include its rights-based approach, the focus on prevention policy and development, the recognition of impairment as a natural part of human diversity, and the recognition of multiple layers of identity and their importance in shaping the experiences of people with disabilities. The last section, in turn, depicts the main strains of critique toward the Human Rights Model of Disability in terms of its epistemic value and its operational side and implementation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Barral, C. (2007). Disabled persons’ associations in France. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 9(3–4), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410701680506
Bell, C. (2011). Blackness and disability: Critical examinations and cultural interventions. Michigan State University Press.
Berghs, M., Atkin, K., Graham, H., Hatton, C., & Thomas, C. (2016). Implications for public health research of models and theories of disability: A scoping study and evidence synthesis. Public Health Research, 4(8), 1–88. https://doi.org/10.3310/phr04080
Bruce, A., Quinn, G., Degener, T., Burke, C., Quinlivan, S., Castellino, J., Kenna, P., & Kilkelly, U. (2002). Human rights and disability: The current use and future potential of United Nations human rights instruments in the context of disability. United Nations Press. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/disability/study.htm
Butlin, S. (2011). The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Does the equality act 2010 measure up to UK international commitments? Industrial Law Journal, 40(4), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwr015
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]. (2013). Including the rights of persons with disabilities in the post 2015 agenda on disability and development. OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/CRPD/StatementInclusionPost2015.doc
Corker, M., & French, S. (1999). Disability discourse. Open University Press.
Degener, T. (2014). A human rights model of disability. In P. Blanck & E. Flynn (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability law and human rights (pp. 31–49). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612881.ch3
Degener, T. (2016). Disability in a human rights context. Laws, 5(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5030035
Degener, T. (2017). 10 years of convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 35(3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051917722294
Forber-Pratt, A. J., Lyew, D. A., Mueller, C., & Samples, L. B. (2017). Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000134
Forber-Pratt, A. J., Minotti, B. J., Burdick, C. E., Kate Brown, M., & Hanebutt, R. A. (2021). Exploring disability identity with adolescents. Rehabilitation Psychology, 66(4), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000411
Isaac, R., Dharma Raja, B. W., & Ravanan, M. P. (2010). Integrating people with disabilities: Their right–our responsibility. Disability and Society, 25(5), 627–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2010.489314
Kasnitz, D., & Shuttleworth, R. (2001). Introduction: Anthropology in disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v21i3.289
Kazou, K. (2017). Analysing the definition of disability in the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Is it really based on a ‘social model’ approach? International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law, 2017(23), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.19164/ijmhcl.v2017i23.630
Kelemen, R., & Vanhala, L. (2010). The shift to the rights model of disability in the EU and Canada. Regional & Federal Studies, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560903174766
Lawson, A., & Beckett, A. (2021). The social and human rights models of disability: Towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(2), 348–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533
Madden, R., Glozier, N., Mpofu, E., & Llewellyn, G. (2011). Eligibility, the ICF and the UN convention: Australian perspectives. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl 4), S6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S6
Morris, J. (1991). Pride against Prejudice. New Society Publishers.
Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and disability: Constructing an ethics of care which promotes human rights. Hypatia, 16(4), 1–16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/hypatia/article/impairment-and-disability-constructing-an-ethics-of-care-that-promotes-human-rights/EDD86688512BE8BF1A1B020D6D1CCE64
Ngwena, C. (2018). Reproductive autonomy of women and girls under the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 140(1), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12351
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. St Martin’s Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
Oliver, M., & Sapey, B. (2006). Social work with disabled people (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Retief, M., & Letšosa, R. (2018). Models of disability: A brief overview. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 74(1), a4738. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i1.4738
Rioux, M., & Carbert, A. (2003). Human rights and disability: The international context. Journal On Developmental Disabilities, 10(2), 1–13. https://oadd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/rioux.pdf
Saxton, M. (2000). Why members of the disability community oppose prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion. In E. Parens & A. Asch (Eds.), Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 147–164). Georgetown University Press.
Scherer, M. J. (2020). It is time for the biopsychosocialtech model. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 15(4), 363–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1752319
Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887456
Söder, M. (2009). Tensions, perspectives and themes in disability studies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410902830496
Stein, M., & Lord, J. (2010). Monitoring the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Innovations, lost opportunities, and future potential. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(1), 689–728. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1101
Stein, M., & Stein, P. (2007). Beyond disability civil rights. Hastings Law Journal, 58(6), 1203–1240. https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol58/iss6/2
UN. (1989). United Nations convention on the rights of the child. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child
UN. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html
UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
United Nations [UN]. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
Vanhala, L. (2015). The diffusion of disability rights in Europe. Human Rights Quarterly, 37(4), 831–853. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24519118
Vernon, A. (1999). The dialectics of multiple identities and the disabled people’s movement. Disability and Society, 14(3), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599926217
Waddington, L., & Priestley, M. (2021). A human rights approach to disability assessment. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 37(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2020.21
Watermeyer, B., Swartz, L., Lorenzo, T., Schneider, M., Priestley, M., & (eds). (2006). Disability and social change: A South African agenda. HSRC Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/6540
Wendell, S. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of disability. Hypatia, 4(2), 104–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3809809
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2011). World report on disability 2011. World health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44575
Young, D. A., & Quibell, R. (2000). Why rights are never enough: Rights, intellectual disability and understanding. Disability and Society, 15(5), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/713661998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sedova, P. (2024). Human Rights Model of Disability. In: Bennett, G., Goodall, E. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Disability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_79-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_79-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40858-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40858-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences