Ultrasound Tomography

• Althaus L (2015) On acoustic tomography using paraxial approximations. Master thesis, Universität Darmstadt

  Google Scholar 

• Andersen AH (1990) A ray tracing approach to restoration and resolution enhancement in experimental ultrasound tomography. Ultrason Imaging 12(4):268–291

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• André MP, Janee HS, Martin PJ, Otto GP, Spivey BA, Palmer DA (1997) High-speed data acquisition in a diffraction tomography system employing large-scale toroidal arrays. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 8(1):137–147

  Article  Google Scholar 

• André MP, Barker CH, Sekhon N, Wiskin J, Borup D, Callahan K (2009) Pre-clinical experience with full-wave inverse-scattering for breast imaging. In: Akiyama I (ed) Acoustical imaging, volume 29 of acoustical imaging. Springer, Netherlands, pp 73–80

  Google Scholar 

• André M, Wiskin J, Borup D, Johnson S, Ojeda-Fournier H, Olson L (2012) Quantitative volumetric breast imaging with 3D inverse scatter computed tomography. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBS, pp 1110–1113

  Google Scholar 

• André M, Wiskin J, Borup D (2013) Clinical results with ultrasound computed tomography of the breast. Quantitative ultrasound in soft tissues. Springer, Berlin, pp 395-432

  Google Scholar 

• Calderon C, Vilkomerson D, Mezrich R, Etzold KF, Kingsley B, Haskin M (1976) Differences in the attenuation of ultrasound by normal, benign, and malignant breast tissue. J Clin Ultrasound 4:249–254

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Camacho J, Medina L, Cruza J, Moreno J, Fritsch C (2012) Multimodal ultrasonic imaging for breast cancer detection. Arch Acoust 37(3):253–260. https://acoustics.ippt.pan.pl/index.php/aa/article/view/89

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carson PL, Oughton TV, Hendee WR, Ahuja S (1977) Imaging soft tissue through bone with ultrasound transmission tomography by reconstruction. Med Phys 4(4):302–309

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Carson PL, Meyer CR, Scherzinger AL, Oughton TV (1981) Breast imaging in coronal planes with simultaneous pulse echo and transmission ultrasound. Science (New York, NY) 214(4525):1141–1143

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Case collection study to determine the accuracy, call back and cancer detection rates of qt ultrasound in breast imaging (accrue) (2021). https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03052166. Accessed: 2021-11-08

• Chen T, Shin J, Huang L (2016) Ultrasound transmission attenuation tomography using energy-scaled amplitude ratios. In: Duric N, Heyde B (eds) Medical imaging 2016: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 9790. International Society for optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham, pp 324–330

  Google Scholar 

• Chen Q, Song H, Yu J, Kim K (2021) Current development and applications of super-resolution ultrasound imaging. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 21(7):2417

  Google Scholar 

• Chenevert TL, Bylski DI, Carson PL, Meyer CR, Bland PH, Adler DD, Schmitt RM (1984) Ultrasonic computed tomography of the breast. Improvement of image quality by use of cross-correlation time-of-flight and phase-insensitive attenuation measurements. Radiology 152(1):155–159

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Cueto C, Guasch L, Cudeiro J, Agudo OC, Bates O, Strong G, Tang M-X (2021) Spatial response identification enables robust experimental ultrasound computed tomography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 69(1):27–37

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• D’Astous FT, Foster FS (1986) Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 12(10):795–808

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Dapp R (2013) Abbildungsmethoden für die Brust mit einem 3D-Ultraschall-Computertomographen. Dissertation, Karlsruher Institut f”ur Technologie

  Google Scholar 

• Dapp R, Zapf M, Ruiter NV (2011) Geometry-independent speed of sound reconstruction for 3D USCT using apriori information. In: 2011 IEEE international ultrasonics symposium, pp 1403–1406

  Google Scholar 

• Dapp R, Gemmeke H, Ruiter NV (2012) 3D refraction-corrected transmission reconstruction for 3D Ultrasound Computer Tomography. In: Bosch JG, Doyley MM (eds) SPIE medical imaging 2012: ultrasonic imaging, tomography, and therapy, pp 832014–832014–7

  Google Scholar 

• Delphinus Medical Technologies Inc (2021) Delphinus receives FDA approval for its SoftVue 3D whole breast ultrasound tomography system. https://www.delphinusmt.com/news/delphinus-receives-fda-approval-for-its-softvue-3d-whole-breast-ultrasound-tomography-system/. Accessed: 2021-11-08

• Ding M, Song J, Zhou L, Wang S, Yuchi M (2018) In vitro and in vivo evaluations of breast ultrasound tomography imaging system in HUST. In: Duric N, Byram BC (eds) Medical imaging 2018: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 10580. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham, pp 162–169

  Google Scholar 

• Doctor SR, Hall TE, Reid LD (1986) SAFT—the evolution of a signal processing technology for ultrasonic testing. NDT Int 19(3):163–167

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dubinsky TJ, Cuevas C, Dighe MK, Kolokythas O, Hwang JH (2008) High-intensity focused ultrasound: Current potential and oncologic applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(1):191–199

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Duric N, Littrup P, Li C, Rama O, Bey-Knight L, Schmidt S, Lupinacci J (2009) Detection and characterization of breast masses with ultrasound tomography: clinical results. In: McAleavey SA, D’hooge J (eds) SPIE proceedings vol. 7265: medical imaging 2009: ultrasonic imaging and signal processing, vol 7265. p 72651G

  Google Scholar 

• Duric N, Littrup P, Chandiwala-Mody P, Li C, Schmidt S, Myc L, Rama O, Bey-Knight L, Lupinacci J, Ranger B, Szczepanski A, West E (2010) In-vivo imaging results with ultrasound tomography: report on an ongoing study at the Karmanos cancer institute. In: SPIE proceedings vol. 7629: medical imaging 2010: ultrasonic imaging, tomography, and therapy, p 76290M

  Google Scholar 

• Duric N, Li C, Roy O, Schmidt S (2011) Acoustic tomography: promise versus reality. In: IEEE international ultrasonics symposium, IUS, pp 2033–2041

  Google Scholar 

• Duric N, Littrup P, Schmidt S, Li C, Roy O, Bey-Knight L, Janer R, Kunz D, Chen X, Goll J, Wallen A, Zafar F, Allada V, West E, Jovanovic I, Li K, Greenway W (2013) Breast imaging with the SoftVue imaging system: First results. In: SPIE proceedings vol. 8675: medical imaging 2013: ultrasonic imaging, tomography, and therapy, vol 8675. p 86750K

  Google Scholar 

• Duric N, Littrup P, Li C, Roy O, Schmidt S, Cheng X, Seamans J, Wallen A, Bey-Knight L (2014) Breast imaging with SoftVue: initial clinical evaluation. In: Bosch JG, Doyley MM (eds) Medical imaging 2014: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 9040. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, pp 208–215

  Google Scholar 

• Duric N, Littrup P, Sak M, Li C, Chen D, Roy O, Bey-Knight L, Brem R (2020) A novel marker, based on ultrasound tomography, for monitoring early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Breast Imaging 2(6):569–576

  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Dussik KT (1942) Über die Möglichkeit hochfrequente mechanische Schwingungen als diagnostisches Hilfsmittel zu verwerten. Z Neurol Psychiat 174(183):153-168

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Edmonds PD, Mortensen CL, Hill JR, Holland SK, Jensen JF, Schattner P, Valdes AD (1991) Ultrasound tissue characterization of breast biopsy specimens. Ultrason Imaging 13(2):162–185

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Errico C, Pierre J, Pezet S, Desailly Y, Lenkei Z, Couture O, Tanter M (2015) Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging. Nature 527(7579):499–502

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Fan X, Hynynen K (1996) Ultrasound surgery using multiple sonications–treatment time considerations. Ultrasound Med Biol 22(4):471–482

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Fischer T, Bick U, Thomas A (2007) Mammographie-Screening in Deutschland. Vis J 15:62–67

  Google Scholar 

• Günter A (2002) Quantitative Analyse und objektive Darstellung von Ultraschallbildern zur medizinischen Diagnose. Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe

  Google Scholar 

• Gemmeke H, Berger L, Hopp T, Zapf M, Tan W, Blanco R, Leys R, Peric I, Ruiter NV (2018) The new generation of the kit 3D USCT. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on medical ultrasound tomography: 1.- 3. Nov. 2017, Speyer, Germany. Hrsg.: T. Hopp. KIT Scientific Publishing, pp 271–282. 54.02.02; LK 01

  Google Scholar 

• Glover GH (1977) Characterization of in vivo breast tissue by ultrasonic time of flight computed tomography. In: Proceeding of the national bureau of standards 2nd international symposium on ultrasonic tissue characterization, p 221

  Google Scholar 

• Goncharsky AV, Romanov SY (2013) Supercomputer technologies in inverse problems of ultrasound tomography. Inverse Prob 29:075004

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greenleaf JF (1977) Quantitative cross-sectional imaging of ultrasound parameters. In: Ultrasonics symposium proceedings, pp 989–995

  Google Scholar 

• Greenleaf JF (1986) A graphical description of scattering. Ultrasound Med Biol 12(8):603–609

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Greenleaf J, Bahn RC (1981) Clinical imaging with transmissive ultrasonic computerized tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 28(2):177–185

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Greenleaf JF, Johnson SA, Lee SL, Herman GT, Wood EH (1974) Algebraic reconstruction of spatial distributions of acoustic absorption within tissue from their two-dimensional acoustic projections. In: Acoustic holography, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 591–603

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Greenleaf JF, Ylitalo J Gisvold JJ (1987) Ultrasonic computed tomography for breast examination. IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine: the quarterly magazine of the engineering in medicine & biology society 6(4):27–32

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Guasch L, Agudo OC, Tang M-X, Nachev P, Warner M (2020) Full-waveform inversion imaging of the human brain. NPJ Digital Med 3(1):28

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hardt M (2012) Distributed simulations for 3D ultrasound computer tomography. Acoustic wave simulations for a new breast cancer imaging device. Ph.d. thesis, University of Karlsruhe

  Google Scholar 

• Hesse MC, Salehi L, Schmitz G (2013) Nonlinear simultaneous reconstruction of inhomogeneous compressibility and mass density distributions in unidirectional pulse-echo ultrasound imaging. Phys Med Biol 58(17):6163–6178

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Holmes JH, Howry DH, Posakony GJ, Cushman CR (1955) The ultrasonic visualization of soft tissue structures in the human body. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 66(C):208–225

  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Hopp T (2012) Multimodal registration of x-ray mammography with 3D volume datasets. Ph.d. thesis, University Mannheim

  Google Scholar 

• Hopp T, Ruiter NV (2021) Strain elastography with ultrasound computer tomography: a simulation study based on biomechanical models. In: Byram BC, Ruiter NV (eds) Medical imaging 2021: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 11602. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham, pp 194–201

  Google Scholar 

• Hopp T, Duric N, Ruiter NV (2015) Image fusion of ultrasound computer tomography volumes with x-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration. Comput Med Imaging Graph 40:170–181

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Howry DH, Bliss WR (1952) Ultrasonic visualization of soft tissue structures of the body. J Lab Clin Med 40:579–592

  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Hung S-H, Dahlen FA, Nolet G (2000) Frechet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes-II. Examples. Geophys J Int 141:175–203

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jensen J, Nikolov SI, Yu A, Garcia D (2016) Ultrasound vector flow imaging: Ii: parallel systems. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 63:1–1

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson SA, Abbott T, Bell R, Berggren M, Borup D, Robinson D, Wiskin J, Olsen S, Hanover B (2007) Non-invasive breast tissue characterization using ultrasound speed and attenuation. In: Acoustical imaging. Springer, Netherlands, pp 147–154

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Keller JB (1969) Accuracy and validity of the Born and Rytov approximations. J Opt Soc Am 59(8):1003–1004

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kelly KM, Richwald GA (2011) Automated whole-breast ultrasound: advancing the performance of breast cancer screening. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 32(4):273–280

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Klepper JR, Brandenburger GH, Busse LJ, Miller JG (1977) Phase cancellation, reflection, and refraction effects in quantitative ultrasonic attenuation tomography. In: 1977 ultrasonics symposium, pp 182–188

  Google Scholar 

• Kretzek E, Ruiter NV (2014) GPU based 3D SAFT reconstruction including phase aberration. In: Bosch JG, Doyley MM (eds) Proceeding SPIE 9040, medical imaging 2014: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, p 90400W

  Google Scholar 

• Kretzek E, Zapf M, Birk M, Gemmeke H, Ruiter NV (2013) GPU based acceleration of 3D USCT image reconstruction with efficient integration into MATLAB. In: Bosch JG, Doyley MM (eds) Proceedings of SPIE 8675, medical imaging 2013: ultrasonic imaging, tomography, and therapy, p 86750O

  Google Scholar 

• Kretzek E, Hucker P, Zapf M, Ruiter NV (2015) Evaluation of directional reflectivity characteristics as new modality for 3D Ultrasound Computer Tomography. In: 2015 IEEE international ultrasonics symposium (IUS)

  Google Scholar 

• Lasaygues P, Rouyer J, Mensah S, Franceschini E, Rabau G, Guillermin R, Bernard S, Monteiller V, Komatitsch D (2018) Non-linear ultrasonic computed tomography (USCT) for soft and hard tissue imaging. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on medical ultrasound tomography, pp 77-88

  Google Scholar 

• Lavarello RJ, Oelze ML (2009) Tomographic reconstruction of three-dimensional volumes using the distorted Born iterative method. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(10):1643–1653

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Li C, Duric N, Huang L (2008) Breast imaging using transmission ultrasound: reconstructing tissue parameters of sound speed and attenuation. In: BioMedical engineering and informatics: new development and the future - proceedings of the 1st international conference on bioMedical engineering and informatics, BMEI 2008, vol 2. pp 708–712

  Google Scholar 

• Li C, Duric N, Littrup P, Huang L (2009) In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography. Ultrasound Med Biol 35(10):1615–1628

  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Linzer M, Norton, SJ (1982) Ultrasonic tissue characterization. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 11(4):303–329

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Malik B, Terry R, Wiskin J, Lenox M (2018) Quantitative transmission ultrasound tomography: imaging and performance characteristics. Med Phys 45(7):3063–3075

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Malik B, Iuanow E, Klock J (2020) An exploratory multi-reader, multi-case study comparing transmission ultrasound to mammography on recall rates and detection rates for breast cancer lesions. Acad Radiol 29:S10–S18

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Malik B, Lee S, Natesan R, Wiskin J (2020) Clustering based quantitative breast density assessment using 3D transmission ultrasound. In: Byram BC, Ruiter NV (eds) Medical imaging 2020: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 11319. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham, pp 91–96

  Google Scholar 

• Manohar S, Dantuma M (2019) Current and future trends in photoacoustic breast imaging. Photoacoustics 16:100134

  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Marmarelis VZ, Jeong J, Shin DC, Do S (2007) High-resolution 3-D imaging and tissue differentiation with transmission tomography. In: André MP et al (eds) Acoustical imaging, volume 28 of acoustical imaging. Springer, Netherlands, pp 195–206

  Google Scholar 

• Medina-Valdés L, Pérez-Liva M, Camacho J, Udías JM, Herraiz JL, González-Salido N (2015) Multi-modal ultrasound imaging for breast cancer detection. Phys Procedia 63:134–140. 43rd Annual UIA Symposium 23–25 April 2014 CSIC Madrid, Spain

  Google Scholar 

• Misaridis T, Jensen JA (2005) Use of modulated excitation signals in medical ultrasound. Part I: basic concepts and expected benefits. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 52(2):177–191

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Misaridis T, Munk P (2004) High frame rate imaging using parallel transmission of focused coded fields [medical ultrasound imaging applications]. In: IEEE ultrasonics symposium 2004, vol 2. pp 1417–1420

  Google Scholar 

• Mortensen CL, Edmonds PD, Gorfu Y, Hill JR, Jensen JF, Schattner P, Shifrin LA, Valdes AD, Jeffrey SS, Esserman LJ (1996) Ultrasound tissue characterization of breast biopsy specimens: expanded study. Ultrason Imaging 18(3):215–230

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mueller RK, Kaveh M, Wade G (1979) Reconstructive tomography and applications to ultrasonics. Proc IEEE 67(4):567–587

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Natterer F (2001) The mathematics of computerized tomography. Society for industrial and applied mathematics, Philadelphia

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Natterer F (2008) Acoustic mammography in the time domain. Technical report, University Muenster

  Google Scholar 

• Nikolov S, Jensen JA (2002) Virtual ultrasound sources in high-resolution ultrasound imaging. In: Insana MF, Walker WF (eds) Medical imaging 2002: ultrasonic imaging and signal processing, vol 4687. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham, pp 395–405

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Norton SJ, Linzer M (1979) Ultrasonic reflectivity imaging in three dimensions: reconstruction with spherical transducer arrays. Ultrason Imaging 1:210–231

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Norton SJ, Linzer M (1979) Ultrasonic reflectivity tomography: reconstruction with circular transducer arrays. Ultrason Imaging 1(2):154–184

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Norton SJ, Linzer M (1981) Ultrasonic reflectivity imaging in three dimensions: exact inverse scattering solutions for plane, cylindrical, and spherical apertures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME-28(2):202–220

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Donnell M, Mimbs JW, Sobel BE, Miller JB (1977) Ultrasonic attenuation in normal and ischemic myocardium. In: Proceeding of the national bureau of standards 2nd international symposium on ultrasonic tissue characterization, p 63

  Google Scholar 

• Özmen N, Dapp R, Zapf M, Gemmeke H, Ruiter NV, van Dongen KWA (2015) Comparing different ultrasound imaging methods for breast cancer detection. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 62(4):637–646

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Pellegretti P, Vicari M, Zani M, Weigel M, Borup D, Wiskin J, Saueressig U, Kotter E, Langer M (2011) A clinical experience of a prototype automated breast ultrasound system combining transmission and reflection 3D imaging. In: IEEE international ultrasonics symposium, IUS, p 1407–1410

  Google Scholar 

• Qian ZW, Xiong L, Yu J, Shao D, Zhu H, Wu X (2006) Noninvasive thermometer for HIFU and its scaling. Ultrasonics 44:e31–e35. Proceedings of Ultrasonics International (UI’05) and World Congress on Ultrasonics (WCU)

  Google Scholar 

• Rouyer J, Mensah S, Franceschini E, Lasaygues P, Lefebvre J-P (2012) Conformal ultrasound imaging system for anatomical breast inspection. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 59(7):1457–1469

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Roy O, Schmidt S, Li C, Allada V, West E, Kunz D, Duric N (2013) Breast imaging using ultrasound tomography: from clinical requirements to system design. In: 2013 IEEE international ultrasonics symposium (IUS), p 1174–1177

  Google Scholar 

• Ruiter NV, Göbel G, Berger L, Zapf M, Gemmeke H (2011) Realization of an optimized 3D USCT. In: D’hooge J, Doyley MM (eds) Proceeding SPIE 7968, medical imaging 2011: ultrasonic imaging, tomography, and therapy, p 796805

  Google Scholar 

• Ruiter NV, Zapf M, Dapp R, Hopp T, Kaiser WA, Gemmeke H (2013) First results of a clinical study with 3D ultrasound computer tomography. In: 2013 IEEE international ultrasonics symposium (IUS), pp 651–654

  Google Scholar 

• Ruiter NV, Zapf M, Hopp T, Gemmeke H, van Dongen KWA, Camacho J, Fritsch C, Cruza JF, Herraiz JL, Perez Liva M, Udias JM (2018) The USCT reference database. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on medical ultrasound tomography: 1.- 3. Nov. 2017, Speyer, Germany. Hrsg.: T. Hopp. KIT Scientific Publishing, pp 385–394. 54.02.02; LK 01

  Google Scholar 

• Sak M, Duric N, Pfeiffer R, Sherman M, Littrup P, Simon M, Gorski D, Albrecht T, Ali H, Brem R, Fan S, Gierach G (2020) Abstract p3-08-28: tissue sound speed is more strongly associated with breast cancer risk than mammographic percent density: a comparative case-control study. Cancer Res 80(4 Supplement):P3–08

  Google Scholar 

• Salido N, Medina L, Camacho J (2016) Full angle spatial compound of ARFI images for breast cancer detection. Ultrasonics 71:161–171

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sandhu GY, Li C, Roy O, Schmidt S, Duric N (2015) Frequency domain ultrasound waveform tomography: breast imaging using a ring transducer. Phys Med Biol 60(14):5381–5398

  Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Schomberg H (1978) An improved approach to reconstructive ultrasound tomography. J Phys D Appl Phys 11(15):L181–L185

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schwarzenberg GF, Gemmeke H, Ruiter NV (2008) 3D PSF analysis for arbitrary transducer geometries and SAFT-based image reconstruction. In: McAleavey SA, D’hooge J (eds) SPIE proceedings vol. 6920: medical imaging 2008: ultrasonic imaging and signal processing, p 69200A

  Google Scholar 

• Sehgal CM, Greenleaf JF (1984) Scattering of ultrasound by tissues. Ultrason Imaging 6(1):60–80

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Simonetti F, Huang L, Duric N (2009) A multiscale approach to diffraction tomography of complex three-dimensional objects. Appl Phys Lett 95:061904

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spetzler J, Snieder R (2004) The Fresnel volume and transmitted waves. Geophysics 69(3):653–663

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stotzka R, Widmann H, Müller TO, Schlote-Holubek K, Gemmeke H, Ruiter NV, Göbel G (2004) Prototype of a new 3D ultrasound computer tomography system: transducer design and data recording. In: Walker WF, Emelianov SY (eds) Proceeding SPIE. 5373, medical imaging 2004: ultrasonic imaging and signal processing, pp 70–79

  Google Scholar 

• Suzuki A, Tsubota Y, Terada T, Yamashita H, Kato F, Nishida M, Satoh M, and Kawabata K (2021) Optimized source estimation for full waveform inversion in ultrasound computed tomography. In: Byram BC, Ruiter NV (eds) Medical imaging 2021: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 11602. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham, pp 32–39

  Google Scholar 

• Szabo TL (2014) Diagnostic ultrasound imaging: inside out. Academic Press, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Tae-Seong K (2005) 3-D high resolution ultrasonic transmission tomography and soft tissue differentiation. J Biomed Eng Res 26(1):55–63

  Google Scholar 

• Tan WY, Steiner T, Ruiter NV (2015) Newton’s method based self calibration for a 3D Ultrasound Tomography System. In: 2015 IEEE international ultrasonics symposium (IUS), pp 1–4

  Google Scholar 

• Tanter M, Fink M (2014) Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq control 61:102–119

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Taskin U (2021) Full-waveform inversion for breast ultrasound. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology

  Google Scholar 

• Cormen TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL, Stein C (1990) Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• USCT Exchange and Collaboration Platform (2021) http://ipeusctdb1.ipe.kit.edu/~usct/challenge/. Accessed: 2021-04-21

• van Dongen KWA, Wright WMD (2007) A full vectorial contrast source inversion scheme for three-dimensional acoustic imaging of both compressibility and density profiles. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1538–1549

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Virieux J, Operto S (2009) An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics 74(6):WCC1–WCC26

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang H, Qian X, Gemmeke H, Hopp T, Ruiter NV, Hesser J (2020) Fast image reconstruction in ultrasound transmission tomography by U-net. In: 2020 virtual IEEE nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference

  Google Scholar 

• Webb S (1988) The physics of medical imaging. Hilger, Bristol Philadelphia

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Williamson PR (1991) A guide to the limits of resolution imposed by scattering in ray tomography. Geophysics 56(2):202–207

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wiskin J, Borup D, Johnson S (2011) Inverse scattering theory. In André MP, Jones JP, Lee H (eds) Acoustical imaging, vol 30. Springer, Netherlands, pp 53–59

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Wiskin J, Borup DT, Johnson SA, Berggren M (2012) Non-linear inverse scattering: high resolution quantitative breast tissue tomography. J Acoust Soc Am 131(5):3802–3813

  Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Wiskin J, Borup D, Johnson S, André M, Greenleaf J, Parisky Y, Klock J (2013) Three-dimensional nonlinear inverse scattering: quantitative transmission algorithms, refraction corrected reflection, scanner design and clinical results. In: Proceedings of meetings on acoustics, vol 19

  Google Scholar 

• Wiskin J, Malik B, Natesan R, Pirshafiey N, Klock J, Lenox M (2019) 3D full inverse scattering ultrasound tomography of the human knee (conference Presentation). In: Byram BC, Ruiter NV (eds) Medical imaging 2019: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 10955. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham

  Google Scholar 

• Wiskin J, Malik B, Theendakara V, Klock J (2020) Orthopedic and myopathic imaging with transmission ultrasound tomography: experimental verification, quantitative accuracy and clinical implications. In: Byram BC, Ruiter NV (eds) Medical imaging 2020: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 11319. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham, pp 175–182

  Google Scholar 

• Wiskin J, Malik B, Pirshafiey N, Klock J (2020) Limited view reconstructions with transmission ultrasound tomography: clinical implications and quantitative accuracy. In: Byram BC, Ruiter NV (eds) Medical imaging 2020: ultrasonic imaging and tomography, vol 11319. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Bellingham, p 167–174

  Google Scholar 

• Woo J (2015) A short history of the development of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/history1.html. Accessed: 2015-11-09.

• Yamashita M (2021) Delphinus SoftVue prospective case collection - arm 1 (SV PCC ARM1). https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03257839. Accessed: 2021-11-08

• Yu T, Fan X, Xiong S, Hu K, Wang Z (2006) Microbubbles assist goat liver ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound. Eur Radiol 16(7):1557–1563

  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Zhang X, Broschat SL, Flynn PJ (2004) A numerical study of conjugate gradient directions for an ultrasound inverse problem. J Comput Acoust 12(4): 587–604

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zografos G, Liakou P, Koulocheri D, Liovarou I, Sofras M, Hadjiagapis S, Orme M, Marmarelis V (2015) Differentiation of BIRADS-4 small breast lesions via multimodal ultrasound tomography. Eur Radiol 25(2):410–418

  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references