Skip to main content

Merging Affordances and (Abstract) Concepts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Affordances in Everyday Life

Abstract

The notion of affordance posits important challenges for the investigation of language and abstract concepts. Studies on affordances and language indicate that language is grounded in the sensorimotor system and also that language filters and selects information derived from affordances. Literature on affordances can be relevant for the comprehension of concepts, and particularly of abstract ones, for at least two reasons. First, affordances might play a role in the emergence of abstract concepts (e.g., freedom). When forming abstract concepts, we avoid focusing on object affordances and collect the categorical exemplars based on affordances relying on common sociocultural practices. Second, because to learn and use abstract concepts we might need other people more than to acquire and use concrete concepts, other people might evoke social affordances. These processes might be differently modulated by various kinds of affordances (e.g., motor, sociocultural) and vary depending on the considered kind of abstract concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, A. M. (2018). Affordances, context and sociality. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02044-1

  • Borghi, A. M. (2020). A future of words: Language and the challenge of abstract concepts. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2009). Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances. Brain Research, 1253, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, A. M., Fini, C., & Tummolini, L. (2021). Abstract concepts and metacognition: Searching for meaning in self and others. In Handbook of embodied psychology (pp. 197–220). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585–1599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., & Bayliss, A. P. (2011). Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119(3), 430–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2011). When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0054-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91(4), 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, F., Campione, G. C., Dalla Volta, R., Gianelli, C., & Gentilucci, M. (2011). Social requests and social affordances: How they affect the kinematics of motor sequences during interactions between conspecifics. PLoS One, 6(1), e15855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, C., Era, V., da Rold, F., Candidi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Abstract concepts in interaction: The need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions. Royal Society Open, 8, 7. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzuca, C., Fini, C., Michalland, A. H., Falcinelli, I., Da Rold, F., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). From affordances to abstract words: The flexibility of sensorimotor grounding. Brain Sciences, 11(10), 1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalland, A., Falcinelli, I., Liuzza, M. T., Tummolini, L., Borghi, A. M. (2021). Affordances in the CoviD-19 pandemic: The case of objects touched by unknown people. Royal Society Open Science. Pre registered report— in principle acceptance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzulo, G., & Cisek, P. (2016). Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scorolli, C., Miatton, M., Wheaton, L. A., & Borghi, A. M. (2014). I give you a cup, I get a cup: A kinematic study on social intention. Neuropsychologia, 57, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, N. (2018). Metacognition and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0133

  • Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 403–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rio, L., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., Nicoletti, R., Borghi, A.M.(2019). Children are less bounded to functional fixedness than adults in interacting with objects. Poster presentedat CAOS, Rovereto Workshop on Concepts, Actions, and Objects: Functional and Neural Perspectives, May 2-4,2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borghi, A.M. (2022). Merging Affordances and (Abstract) Concepts. In: Djebbara, Z. (eds) Affordances in Everyday Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08629-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics