Abstract
The notion of affordance posits important challenges for the investigation of language and abstract concepts. Studies on affordances and language indicate that language is grounded in the sensorimotor system and also that language filters and selects information derived from affordances. Literature on affordances can be relevant for the comprehension of concepts, and particularly of abstract ones, for at least two reasons. First, affordances might play a role in the emergence of abstract concepts (e.g., freedom). When forming abstract concepts, we avoid focusing on object affordances and collect the categorical exemplars based on affordances relying on common sociocultural practices. Second, because to learn and use abstract concepts we might need other people more than to acquire and use concrete concepts, other people might evoke social affordances. These processes might be differently modulated by various kinds of affordances (e.g., motor, sociocultural) and vary depending on the considered kind of abstract concepts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227.
Borghi, A. M. (2018). Affordances, context and sociality. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02044-1
Borghi, A. M. (2020). A future of words: Language and the challenge of abstract concepts. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 42.
Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2009). Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances. Brain Research, 1253, 117–128.
Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351
Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000089
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153.
Borghi, A. M., Fini, C., & Tummolini, L. (2021). Abstract concepts and metacognition: Searching for meaning in self and others. In Handbook of embodied psychology (pp. 197–220). Springer.
Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585–1599.
Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., & Bayliss, A. P. (2011). Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119(3), 430–437.
Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2011). When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0054-4
Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91(4), 451–471.
Ferri, F., Campione, G. C., Dalla Volta, R., Gianelli, C., & Gentilucci, M. (2011). Social requests and social affordances: How they affect the kinematics of motor sequences during interactions between conspecifics. PLoS One, 6(1), e15855.
Fini, C., Era, V., da Rold, F., Candidi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Abstract concepts in interaction: The need of others when guessing abstract concepts smooths dyadic motor interactions. Royal Society Open, 8, 7. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201205
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mazzuca, C., Fini, C., Michalland, A. H., Falcinelli, I., Da Rold, F., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). From affordances to abstract words: The flexibility of sensorimotor grounding. Brain Sciences, 11(10), 1304.
Michalland, A., Falcinelli, I., Liuzza, M. T., Tummolini, L., Borghi, A. M. (2021). Affordances in the CoviD-19 pandemic: The case of objects touched by unknown people. Royal Society Open Science. Pre registered report— in principle acceptance.
Pezzulo, G., & Cisek, P. (2016). Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013
Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352.
Scorolli, C., Miatton, M., Wheaton, L. A., & Borghi, A. M. (2014). I give you a cup, I get a cup: A kinematic study on social intention. Neuropsychologia, 57, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.006
Shea, N. (2018). Metacognition and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0133
Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 403–430.
Rio, L., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., Nicoletti, R., Borghi, A.M.(2019). Children are less bounded to functional fixedness than adults in interacting with objects. Poster presentedat CAOS, Rovereto Workshop on Concepts, Actions, and Objects: Functional and Neural Perspectives, May 2-4,2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borghi, A.M. (2022). Merging Affordances and (Abstract) Concepts. In: Djebbara, Z. (eds) Affordances in Everyday Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08629-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08629-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08583-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08629-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)