Abstract
Successful navigation often requires detecting and exploiting a range of affordances in the environment. These can be visible affordances such as a path enabling efficient travel, a landmark to distinguish the direction, or a boundary to locate a goal. Other affordances require greater integration of sensory information with stored knowledge, such as determining that a novel path will be a shortcut, or being able to infer that the current region of the environment has strong global connections due to its long line of sight and central location in the broader space. This essay reviews studies exploring affordances for navigation and their neural underpinnings. We highlight recent discoveries indicating a role of the occipital place area in detecting path affordances, the retrosplenial cortex in landmark processing, and the hippocampus in processing path connections. Finally, we extend our consideration to affordances of an environment that impact affect, where layout or features could induce negative affect such as fear, and the reverse where affordances can enhance positive affect by, for example, offering a sense of safety. Such alterations in the emotional state may impact navigation and learning of an environment, and we suggest new avenues for research to explore this.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Djebbara Z, Fich LB, Petrini L, & Gramann K. (2019). Sensorimotor brain dynamics reflect architectural affordances. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(29), 14769–14778.
Bailey, K. R., Rustay, N. R., & Crawley, J. N. (2006). Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice: Practical concerns and potential pitfalls. ILAR Journal, 47(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.47.2.124
Bonner, M. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2017). Coding of navigational affordances in the human visual system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18), 4793–4798.
Bonner, M. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2018). Computational mechanisms underlying cortical responses to the affordance properties of visual scenes. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(4), e1006111. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006111
Brunec, I. K., Javadi, A. H., Zisch, F. E., & Spiers, H. J. (2017). Contracted time and expanded space: The impact of circumnavigation on judgements of space and time. Cognition, 166, 425–432.
Caduff, D., & Timpf, S. (2008). On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cognitive Processing, 9(4), 249–267.
Coutrot, A., Silva, R., Manley, E., de Cothi, W., Sami, S., Bohbot, V. D., … Spiers, H. J. (2018). Global determinants of navigation ability. Current Biology, 28(17), 2861–2866.
Coutrot, A., Manley, E., Yesiltepe, D., Dalton, R. C., Wiener, J. M., Hölscher, C., … Spiers, H. J. (2020). Cities have a negative impact on navigation ability: Evidence from 38 countries. bioRxiv.. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.23.917211v3
Dalton, R. C. (2003). The secret is to follow your nose. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238867
Djebbara, Z., Fich, L. B., & Gramann, K. (2021). The brain dynamics of architectural affordances during transition. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–15.
Doeller, C. F., & Burgess, N. (2008). Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries. PNAS, 105(15), 5909–5914.
Duvelle, É., Grieves, R. M., Liu, A., Jedidi-Ayoub, S., Holeniewska, J., Harris, A., … Spiers, H. J. (2021). Hippocampal place cells encode global location but not connectivity in a complex space. Current Biology, 31(6), 1221–1233.
Emo, B. (2014). Seeing the axial line: Evidence from wayfinding experiments. Behavioral Sciences, 4(3), 167–180.
Epstein, R. A. (2008). Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(10), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.004
Epstein, S. L., Aroor, A., Evanusa, M., Sklar, E., & Parsons, S. (2015). Navigation with learned spatial affordances. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A.S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C.D. Jennings & P.P. Maglio (eds) Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 644–649.
Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J. B., & Spiers, H. J. (2017). The cognitive map in humans: Spatial navigation and beyond. Nature Neuroscience, 20(11), 1504–1513.
Erkan, L. (2018). Examining wayfinding behaviours in architectural spaces using brain imaging with electroencephalography (EEG). Architectural Science Review, 61(6), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1523129
Gahnstrom, C. J., & Spiers, H. J. (2020). Striatal and hippocampal contributions to flexible navigation in rats and humans. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 4, 2398212820979772.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The theory of affordances. In J. J. Gieseking, W. Mangold, C. Katz, S. Low, & S. Saegert (Eds.), The people, place, and space reader (2014) (pp. 56–60). Routledge.
Griesbauer, E., Manley, E., McNamee, D., Morley, J., & Spiers, H. J. (2021). What determines a boundary for navigating a complex street network: Evidence from London taxi drivers. Journal of Navigation, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463321000679
Hackman, D. A., Robert, S. A., Grübel, J., Weibel, R. P., Anagnostou, E., Hölscher, C., & Schinazi, V. R. (2019). Neighborhood environments influence emotion and physiological reactivity. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–11.
Harel, A., Nador, J. D., Bonner, M. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2022). Early electrophysiological markers of navigational affordances in scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 34(3), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01810
Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 29–37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41514683
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.
Hölscher, C., Brösamle, M., & Vrachliotis, G. (2012). Challenges in multilevel wayfinding: A case study with the space syntax technique (p. 36). Planning and Design.
Janzen, G., & Van Turennout, M. (2004). Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience, 7(6), 673–677.
Javadi, A. H., Emo, B., Howard, L. R., Zisch, F. E., Yu, Y., Knight, R., … Spiers, H. J. (2017). Hippocampal and prefrontal processing of network topology to simulate the future. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1–11.
Jeffery, K. (2019). Urban architecture: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. The Design Journal, 22(6), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1662666
Julian, J. B., Ryan, J., Hamilton, R. H., & Epstein, R. A. (2016). The occipital place area is causally involved in representing environmental boundaries during navigation. Current Biology, 26(8), 1104–1109.
Kostakos, P., Alavesa, P., Korkiakoski, M., Marques, M. M., Lobo, V., & Duarte, F. (2020). Wired to exit: Exploring the effects of wayfinding affordances in underground facilities using virtual reality. Simulation & Gaming, 52(2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120944567
Marchette, S. A., Vass, L. K., Ryan, J., & Epstein, R. A. (2015). Outside looking in: Landmark generalization in the human navigational system. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(44), 14896–14908. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2270-15.2015
Miller, J., & Carlson, L. (2011). Selecting landmarks in novel environments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0038-9
Noble, S., Dalton, N., Hornberger, M., & Spiers, H. (2020). Redefining global and local landmarks: When does a landmark stop being local and become a global one? In Spatial cognition XII: 12th international conference, spatial cognition 2020 proceedings (Vol. 12162, p. 111). Springer Nature.
O’Keefe, J., & Dostrovsky, J. (1971). The hippocampus as a spatial map: Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research, 34(1), 171–175.
O’Malley, M., Innes, A., & Wiener, J. M. (2017). Decreasing spatial disorientation in care-home settings: How psychology can guide the development of dementia friendly design guidelines. Dementia, 16(3), 315–328.
Ólafsdóttir, H. F., Barry, C., Saleem, A. B., Hassabis, D., & Spiers, H. J. (2015). Hippocampal place cells construct reward related sequences through unexplored space. eLife, 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.06063
Patai, E., & Spiers, H. (2021). The versatile wayfinder: Prefrontal contributions to spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(6), 520–533.
Pezzulo, G., & Cisek, P. (2016). Navigating the affordance landscape: Feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013
Safari, H., & Moridani, F. F. (2017). Syntactical analysis of the accessibility and sociability of a square in the Kuala Lumpur City Center. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(4), 456–468.
Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A. (2008). The dynamic nature of cognition during wayfinding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 232–249.
Spiers, H. J., Coutrot, A., & Hornberger, M. (2021). Explaining world-wide variation in navigation ability from millions of people: Citizen science project Sea Hero Quest. Topics in Cognitive Science. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/tops.12590
Sternberg, E. M., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Neuroscience and architecture: Seeking common ground. Cell, 127(2), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.012
Tu, S., Spiers, H. J., Hodges, J. R., Piguet, O., & Hornberger, M. (2017). Egocentric versus allocentric spatial memory in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 59(3), 883–892. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160592
Utton, D. (2009). The design of housing for people with dementia. Journal of Care Services Management, 3(4), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1179/csm.2009.3.4.380
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Gonzalez-Mora, J. L., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N., & Skov, M. (2015). Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Palumbo, L., & Chatterjee, A. (2021). Individual differences in preference for architectural interiors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101668.
Wiener, J. M., Hölscher, C., Buchner, S., & Konieczny, L. (2009). How the geometry of space controls visualattention during spatial decision making. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2286–2291.
Widloski, J., & Foster, D. J. (2022). Flexible rerouting of hippocampal replay sequences around changing barriers in the absence of global place field remapping. Neuron, 110, 1–12.
Wolbers, T., Weiller, C., & Büchel, C. (2004). Neural foundations of emerging route knowledge in complex spatial environments. Cognitive Brain Research, 21(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.013
Yazdani, A., Lee, J. S., Vesin, J. M., & Ebrahimi, T. (2012). Affect recognition based on physiological changes during the watching of music videos. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133366.2133373
Yesiltepe, D., Dalton, R., Ozbil Torun, A., Dalton, N., Noble, S., Hornberger, M., … & Spiers, H. (2019a). Usage of landmarks in virtual environments for wayfinding: Research on the influence of global landmarks. In 12th international space syntax symposium.
Yesiltepe, D., Dalton, R., Ozbil Torun, A., Dalton, N., Noble, S., Hornberger, M., & Spiers, H. (2019b). A wayfinding research in virtual environments: The effect of spatial structure and different conditions on movement. In 12th international space syntax symposium.
Yesiltepe, D., Ozbil Torun, A., Coutrot, A., Hornberger, M., Spiers, H., & Conroy Dalton, R. (2021). Computer models of saliency alone fail to predict subjective visual attention to landmarks during observed navigation. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 21(1), 39–66.
Zisch, F., Gage, S., & Spiers, H. (2014). Navigating the museum. In N. Levent & A. Pascual-Leone (Eds.), The multisensory museum: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on touch, sound, smell, memory, and space (pp. 215–237). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Zisch, F. Newton, C., Coutrot, A., Murcia, M., Motala, A., Greaves, J., de Cothi, W., Steed, A., Tyler, N., Gage, S. A., & Spiers, H. J. (2022). Comparable human spatial memory distortions in physical, desktop virtual and immersive virtual environments. bioRxiv [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.11.475791.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Leverhulme Trust Doctoral Training Programme for the Ecological Study of the Brain for funding LG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gregorians, L., Spiers, H.J. (2022). Affordances for Spatial Navigation. In: Djebbara, Z. (eds) Affordances in Everyday Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08629-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08629-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08583-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08629-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)