Skip to main content

Environmental Communication (EC) and the New Media

An African Context Perspective

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change

Abstract

The environment has become one of the most critical research areas in the twenty-first century. Along with this trend, Environmental Communication (EC) is also becoming popular. EC is the pragmatic and constitutive vehicle for the understanding of the environment as well as the relationships humans have with the natural world. Further, it is the symbolic medium humans use to construct environmental problems and negotiate society’s different responses to them. This chapter examines the role of the New Media in Environmental Communication in the African context. The chapter reveals that the New Media – online sites, blogs, and other social network platforms – presents many advantages and opportunities for advancing Environmental Communication in Africa including increased connectivity and fast communication on environmental issues, raising awareness of environmental issues, facilitating collaborations and participatory environmental communication, facilitating two-way communication and dialogue on environmental matters, facilitating environmental activism, and promoting environmental education. However, the New Media also has some drawbacks in advancing Environmental Communication in Africa, including information overload and decline of the audience on environmental matters, blanket/untargeted messages on matters of the environment, heterogeneity of African online audience, silencing of digital environmental activists by governments, and new digital media technology being anti-environment. The chapter concludes that, while EC is a public and contested practice, the New Media has the potential to transform communication for environmental matters. The New Media is now the new public sphere – a realm of influence where organizations, politicians, government departments, journalists, the private sector, activists, local authorities, and the public engage others in Environmental Communication – through conversation, questions, argument, and debate. All the stakeholders are responsible for making the best out of the New Media to transform Environmental Communication in Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeiza, M. (2013). The trouble with social media in Africa. New African. https://newafricanmagazine.com/3637/

  • Allen, M. (2016). Strategic communication for sustainable organizations: Theory and practice. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. (2007). What Is Web 2.0? Ideas, Technologies and Implications for Education [Online]. Bristol, UK: JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Retrieved from http://21stcenturywalton.pbworks.com/f/What%20is%20 Web%202.0.pdf.

  • Anderson, A. (2014). Media, environment and the network society. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antonopoulos, N., Karyotakis, M. A., Kiourexidou, M., & Veglis, A. (2019). Media websites environmental communication: Operational practices and news coverage. World of Media. Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 2, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan-Martin, D. (2021). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2021. In Technical report. International Telecommunications Union (ITU). https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2021.pdf

  • Bramwell-Lalor, S., Kelly, K., Ferguson, T., Gentles, C. H., & Roofe, C. (2020). Project-based learning for environmental sustainability action. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre of Environmental Information Studies. (1999). A new model of environmental communication for Europe: From consumption to use of information: Executive summary (Vol. 13). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2010). A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks. Decision Support Systems, 49, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, M., & Nilsson, A. E. (2018). Media, communication, and the environment in precarious times. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. H., Chiu, D. K., Ho, K. K., & Au, C. H. (2020). Applying social media to environmental education: Is it more impactful than traditional media? Information Discovery and Delivery, 48(4), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (2007). Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: Does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environmental Communication, 1(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, S. (2022). Number of social media users worldwide from 2018 to 2022, with forecasts from 2023 to 2027 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, Y., Wang, X., Brombal, D., Moriggi, A., Sharpley, A., & Pang, S. (2018). Changes in environmental awareness and its connection to local environmental management in water conservation zones: The case of Beijing, China. Sustainability, 10(6), 2087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA. (2021). What is environmental education? United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/education/what-environmental-education

  • Facebook. (2016). Liking and reacting. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/help/452446998120360/

  • Fernandez, M., Piccolo, L. S., Maynard, D., Wippoo, M., Meili, C., and Alani, H. (2016, May). Talking climate change via social media: Communication, engagement and behaviour. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on web science (pp. 85–94).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flor, A. G. (2004). Environmental communication: Principles, approaches, strategies of communication applied to environmental management. Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services, UP Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., & Fraser, J. (2017). Creating a climate for change: Interventions, efficacy and public discussion about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace. (2021). 10 African youth climate activists changing the face of the planet. Retrieved from https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/50006/10-african-climate-youth-activists-changing-the-face-of-the-planet/

  • Harris, U. S. (2017). Engaging communities in environmental communication. Pacific Journalism Review, 23(1), 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, U. S. (2018). Participatory media in environmental communication: Engaging communities in the periphery. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T. M., & Barthel, B. (2009). Wielding New Media in Web 2.0: Exploring the history of engagement with the collaborative construction of media products. New Media and society, 11(1–2), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, C., Lane, M., Morse-Jones, S., Brooks, K., & Viner, D. (2022). The ‘co’in co-production of climate action: Challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice. Global Environmental Change, 72, 102445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFRC. (2017). What is a disaster?. www.ifrc.org. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.

  • IPCC. (2021). AR6 climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

  • Jenkins, H. (2011). Convergence culture. Where old and new media collide. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 20, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. M. (2010). In the U.S., many environmental issues at 20-year low concern: Worry about all eight measures tested is down from last year 2010. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/126716/ environmental-issues-year-low-concern.aspx.

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. L., & Li, C. (2020). Toward a normative social media theory for public relations. Public Relations Review, 46, 101857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheerajit, C., & Flor, A. G. (2013). Participatory development communication for natural resources management in Ratchaburi province, Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 703–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León-Anguiano, B., Negredo-Bruna, S., & Erviti, M. (2022). Social engagement with climate change: principles for effective visual representation on social media. Climate Policy, 22(8), 976–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L. (2015). Three challenges for Environmental Communication research. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 392–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T. T. C. (2019). Communicating haze crisis online: Comparing traditional media news and new media perspectives in Singapore. Environmental Communication, 13(7), 864–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenfeld, L. A., Hall, D. M., McGreavy, B., Silka, L., & Hart, D. (2012). Creating a place for environmental communication research in sustainability science. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 6(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods. Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, A., &Okumu, S. (2022). 6 African women shaping the climate conversation. Greenpeace. Retrieved from https://www.greenpeace.org/international/story/52518/6-african-women-shaping-the-climate-conversation/

  • Murugesan, S. (2008). Harnessing green IT: Principles and practices. IT Professional, 10(1), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutsvairo, B. (2021). Why social media activists face an uphill struggle in Zimbabwe. http://democracyinafrica.org/social-media-activists-face-an-uphill-struggle-in-zimbabwe/

  • Owiny, S. A., Mehta, K., & Maretzki, A. N. (2014). The use of social media technologies to create, preserve, and disseminate indigenous knowledge and skills to communities in East Africa. International Journal of Communication, 8, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, M. S. (2013). The dual role of the media in environmental communication as a public sphere and as political actors. Forest Science and Technology, 9(1), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavelle, S., & Wilkinson, C. (2020). Into the digital wild: Utilizing Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook for effective science and environmental communication. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 575122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.575122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedelty, M. (2015). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Environmental Communication., 9(1), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.1003440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M., & Jalaladeen, J. (2016). The role of social media on environmental awareness of undergraduate students in University of Sulaimani in Iraq. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences–JALHSS, 10, 218–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (2008). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement (p. 103). MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshandel, A. T., Labafi, S., & Robati, M. (2016). Effects of social media on the environmental protection behaviour of the public (case study: protecting zayandeh-rood river environment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saepudin, A., & Mulyono, D. (2019). Community education in community development. EMPOWERMENT: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 8(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, M. S., & Schlichting, I. (2014). Media representations of climate change: A meta-analysis of the research field. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 142–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodeinde, S. (2018). Africa’s top five environmental blogs. Nature and Environment. Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/en/africas-top-five-environmental-blogs/a-42806118

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2014). Shaping the future we want: UN decade of education for sustainable development. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002301/230171e.pdf

  • Waititu, P. (2021). Creating community based environmental awareness with social media: A Kenyan perspective. Southern African. Journal of Environmental Education, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. A., Nair, K. S., & Ascroft, J. (1994). Participatory communication: Working for change and development. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • William, J. (2022). Environmental communication: An overview. Journal of Mass Communication and Journalism., 12(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, S., & Gatto, K. A. (2015). Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Advances in Nutrition, 6(6), 842–851. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, N., & Skoric, M. M. (2018). Media use and environmental engagement: Examining differential gains from news media and social media. International Journal of Communication, 12, 380–403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bhanye, J., Maisiri, M. (2023). Environmental Communication (EC) and the New Media. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_397-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_397-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87624-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics