Abstract
Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) is an operant conditioning procedure used to quantify the brain reward function. Thus, this procedure allows us to study the effects of behavioral, pharmacological, or molecular manipulations on the reward circuit. In the context of drug abuse and addiction, ICSS is generally used to test the abuse potential of drugs and to evaluate the aversive effect induced by withdrawal from chronic drug exposure. There are two main methods to assess the effect of a drug on brain stimulation reward: the discrete trial current intensity paradigm and the frequency-rate curve-shift paradigm. However, this chapter describes specifically the frequency-rate curve-shift paradigm in rats. The purpose of this section is to provide the reader with how to perform the frequency-rate curve-shift paradigm with several types of drug exposure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Olds J, Milner P (1954) Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. J Comp Physiol Psychol 47(6):419–427
Milner PM (1989) The discovery of self-stimulation and other stories. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13(2–3):61–67
Rolls ET (1975) The neural basis of brain-stimulation reward. Prog Neurobiol 3:73–160
Rompre PP, Boye S (1989) Localization of reward-relevant neurons in the pontine tegmentum: a moveable electrode mapping study. Brain Res 496(1–2):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(89)91076-7
Bechtholt-Gompf AJ, Walther HV, Adams MA, Carlezon WA Jr, Ongur D, Cohen BM (2010) Blockade of astrocytic glutamate uptake in rats induces signs of anhedonia and impaired spatial memory. Neuropsychopharmacology 35(10):2049–2059. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.74
John CS, Smith KL, Van't Veer A, Gompf HS, Carlezon WA Jr, Cohen BM, Ongur D, Bechtholt-Gompf AJ (2012) Blockade of astrocytic glutamate uptake in the prefrontal cortex induces anhedonia. Neuropsychopharmacology 37(11):2467–2475. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.105
Slattery DA, Markou A, Cryan JF (2007) Evaluation of reward processes in an animal model of depression. Psychopharmacology 190(4):555–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0630-x
Carlezon WA Jr, Chartoff EH (2007) Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in rodents to study the neurobiology of motivation. Nat Protoc 2:2987. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.441. https://www.nature.com/articles/nprot.2007.441#supplementary-information
Negus SS, Miller LL (2014) Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs. Pharmacol Rev 66(3):869–917. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007419
Edmonds DE, Gallistel CR (1974) Parametric analysis of brain stimulation reward in the rat: III. Effect of performance variables on the reward summation function. J Comp Physiol Psychol 87(5):876–883
Miliaressis E, Rompré P-P, Laviolette P, Philippe L, Coulombe D (1986) The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation. Physiol Behav 37:85–91
Bauer CT, Banks ML, Negus SS (2014) The effect of chronic amphetamine treatment on cocaine-induced facilitation of intracranial self-stimulation in rats. Psychopharmacology 231(12):2461–2470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-013-3405-1
Miliaressis E (1981) A miniature, moveable electrode for brain stimulation in small animals. Brain Res Bull 6:715–718
Miliaressis E, Rompré PP, Durivage A (1982) Psychophysical method for mapping behavioral substrates using a moveable electrode. Brain Res Bull 8(6):693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(82)90097-1
Vlachou S, Markou A (2011) Intracranial Self-Stimulation. In: Olmstead MC (ed) Animal Models of Drug Addiction. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-934-5_1
Desai SJ, Bharne AP, Upadhya MA, Somalwar AR, Subhedar NK, Kokare DM (2014) A simple and economical method of electrode fabrication for brain self-stimulation in rats. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 69(2):141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2013.12.006
Bergeron S, Rompré P-P (2013) Blockade of ventral midbrain NMDA receptors enhances brain stimulation reward: A preferential role for GluN2A subunits. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 23:1623–1635
Bonano JS, Glennon RA, De Felice LJ, Banks ML, Negus SS (2014) Abuse-related and abuse-limiting effects of methcathinone and the synthetic "bath salts" cathinone analogs methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), methylone and mephedrone on intracranial self-stimulation in rats. Psychopharmacology 231(1):199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-013-3223-5
Gallo A, Lapointe S, Stip E, Potvin S, Rompre PP (2010) Quetiapine blocks cocaine-induced enhancement of brain stimulation reward. Behav Brain Res 208(1):163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.029
Bauer CT, Banks ML, Blough BE, Negus SS (2013) Use of intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse-related and abuse-limiting effects of monoamine releasers in rats. Br J Pharmacol 168(4):850–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02214.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Hodebourg, R. (2021). Intracranial Self-Stimulation: Using the Curve-Shift Paradigm to Assess the Abuse Potential of Drugs. In: Fakhoury, M. (eds) The Brain Reward System. Neuromethods, vol 165. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1146-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1146-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1145-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1146-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols