Abstract
In this work, we present the first complex study of Cs\(_2\)ZrCl\(_6\) (CZC) scintillating crystals in terms of their chemical purity, crystal radiopurity, scintillating performance and pulse-shape discrimination ability. An ICP-MS measurement exhibits a high purity of the CZC material (overall impurity level less than 10 \(\mu \)g/g). The CZC crystals show a very low content of radionuclides from U/Th natural decay chains. For \(^{40}\)K and \(^{137}\)Cs only limits at the level few mBq/kg were set after more than 650 h of measurement with a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector. Nevertheless, they contained cosmogenic \(^{134}\)Cs with an activity of about 50 mBq/kg. The measurements with two CZC crystals (11 and 24 g) as scintillating detectors over 456.5 d in the low-background DAMA/CRYS facility, deep underground at LNGS, supported a substantial radiopurity of these crystals leading to a counting rate of 0.17\(_{-0.11}^{+0.13}\) (kg\(\cdot \)keV\(\cdot \)yr)\(^{-1}\) at the \(Q_{2\beta }\) of \(^{96}\)Zr (3.35 MeV). These detectors show a high particle-discrimination ability for \(\beta (\gamma )\) and \(\alpha \) particles. Limits on the half-lives of the double beta decays (DBD) of \(^{96}\)Zr and of \(^{94}\)Zr with and without neutrinos emission were also set at the level \(T_{1/2} \sim 10^{17}\)–\(10^{20}\) yr (90\(\%\) C.L.). The detailed analyses of the internal background components will also be useful for further developments of Cs\(_2\)ZrCl\(_6\) low-background scintillating detectors and for the optimization of the experimental conditions.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepja%2Fs10050-023-01090-9/MediaObjects/10050_2023_1090_Fig13_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The data produced in this study are contained in the publication.]
Notes
This uncertainty is related to the used method of measurement, i.e. semi-quantitative mode, where the calibration is over a wide mass range. Better accuracy can be achieved for a certain element only with a dedicated calibration using a standard (i.e. a certified solution with a known amount of the element of interest). However, such precise calibration is typically not performed when acquiring a wide range of elements.
It should be emphasized that in this work, when not differently specified, keV means keV electron equivalent.
The \(\alpha /\beta \) ratio is the light yield ratio between an internal \(\alpha \) particle and an electron with the same kinetic energy of the \(\alpha \) particle. Its knowledge allows the \(\alpha \) energy scale determination from gamma energy calibration.
It should be stressed, that the value of the \(\alpha /\beta \) ratio also depends on many experimental parameters. Here, to evaluate the \(\alpha /\beta \) ratio, the scintillating signals were recorded and analyzed in a 24 \(\mu \)s long time-window.
Only statistical errors coming from the data fluctuations were taken into account in the estimations of the lim S values, and systematic contributions have not been included in the half-life limit values, being negligible.
References
A. Giuliani et al., arXiv:1910.04688v2 [hep-ex] (2020)
S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1530001 (2015)
H. Ejiri, Front. Phys. 7, 30 (2019)
M. Agostini et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 252502 (2020)
Majorana Coll., Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 062501 (2023)
C. Alduino et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 132501 (2018)
CUORE Coll., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 122501 (2020)
O. Azzolini et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 03250 (2019)
CUPID Coll., Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111801 (2022)
A.S. Barabash et al., Phys. Rev. D 98, 092007 (2018)
E. Armengaud et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 181802 (2021)
C. Augier et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1033 (2022)
V. Alenkov et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 791 (2019)
V. Caracciolo et al., Nucl. Phys. A 1002, 121941 (2020)
S. Nagorny, Physics 3, 320 (2021)
C. Cardenas et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 869, 63 (2017)
C. Cardenas et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 872, 23 (2017)
V. Mykhaylyk et al., Dalton Trans. 51, 6944–6954 (2022)
M. Buryi et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 9, 2955–2968 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TC05482H
S. Keiichiro et al., Appl. Phys. Express 9, 042602 (2016)
J. Argyriades et al., Nucl. Phys. A 847, 168 (2010)
N. Dokania et al., J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 45, 075104 (2018)
R. Arnold et al., Nucl. Phys. A 658, 299 (1999)
E. Celi et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 396 (2023)
C. Arpesella et al., Europhys. Lett. 27, 29–34 (1994)
J.D. Vergados, H. Ejiri, F. Šimkovic, IOP 75(10), 106301 (2012)
J. Suhonen, J. Kostensalo, Front. Phys. 7, 29 (2019)
J. Suhonen, Phys. Rev. C 96, 055501 (2017)
P. Belli et al., Particles 4(2), 241–274 (2021)
M. Laubenstein, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32(30), 1743002 (2017)
M. Boswell et al., IEEE-NS 58(3), 1212 (2011)
S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003)
G.J. Feldman, R.D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873 (1998)
R. Bernabei et al., J. Inst. 7, P03009 (2012)
E. Gatti, F. De Martini, Nucl. Electron. 2, 265 (1965)
T. Fazzini et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 410, 213–219 (1998)
L. Bardelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 584, 129 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Robert Janssens.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Belli, P., Bernabei, R., Cappella, F. et al. Development of low-background Cs\(_2\)ZrCl\(_6\) detectors to study rare decays in Zr isotopes. Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 176 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01090-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01090-9