Skip to main content
Log in

Restoration prioritization must be informed by marginalized people

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Matters Arising to this article was published on 13 July 2022

The Original Article was published on 14 October 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Holl, K. D. Restoring tropical forests from the bottom up. Science 355, 455–456 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rights and Resources Initiative. Estimate of the Area of Land and Territories of Indigenous Peoples, Local Communities, and Afro-Descendants Where Their Rights Have Not Been Recognized https://doi.org/10.53892/UZEZ6605 (Rights + Resources, 2020).

  4. Erbaugh, J. T. et al. Global forest restoration and the importance of prioritizing local communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1472–1476 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams, C., Rodrigues, S. T., Calmon, M. & Kumar, C. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: what we know and do not know. Biotropica 48, 731–744 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramprasad, V., Joglekar, A. & Fleischman, F. Plantations and pastoralists: afforestation activities make pastoralists in the Indian Himalaya vulnerable. Ecol. Soc. 25, 1 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar, B. M. Species richness and aboveground carbon stocks in the homegardens of central Kerala, India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 140, 430–440 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ribot, J. Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. J. Peasant Stud. 41, 667–705 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, D. K. & Robbins, P. Ecologies of the colonial present: pathological forestry from the taux de boisement to civilized plantations. Environ. Plan. E Nat. Space 1, 447–469 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Agrawal, A. & Redford, K. Conservation and displacement: an overview. Conserv. Soc. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26392956.pdf (2009).

  11. Barletti, J. P. S. & Larson, A. M. Rights Abuse Allegations in the Context of REDD+ Readiness and Implementation: A Preliminary Review and Proposal for Moving Forward https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006630 (Center for International Forestry Research, 2017).

  12. Pellegrini, P. & Fernández, R. J. Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2335–2340 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. IUFRO. Forests, Trees and the Eradication of Poverty: Potential and Limitations. World Series Vol. 39 (International Union of Forest Research Organizations, 2020).

  14. Luttrell, C., Sills, E., Aryani, R., Ekaputri, A. D. & Evinke, M. F. Beyond opportunity costs: who bears the implementation costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation? Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang 23, 291–310 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman, E. A., Manyindo, J., Parker, A. R. & Schultz, B. Stakeholder engagement increases transparency, satisfaction, and civic action. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24486–24491 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

F.F., E.C., H.F., V.R. and C.R.S. were supported by NASA grant NNX17AK14G and Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (Formas) grant 2020-02781. F.F. and H.F. were supported by Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) grant 2018-05875. J.W.V. was supported by USDA-NIFA Sustainable Agricultural Systems grant 2019-68012-29819, USDA-NIFA McIntire-Stennis Project 1016880 and the National Science Foundation under award DEB-1931232. M.P. was funded through BBSRC Global Challenges research grant no. BB/S014586/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors conceptualized the work and contributed to writing the manuscript. F.F. led the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Forrest Fleischman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fleischman, F., Coleman, E., Fischer, H. et al. Restoration prioritization must be informed by marginalized people. Nature 607, E5–E6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04733-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04733-x

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation