Skip to main content
Log in

Do you see what I see?: exploring trends in organizational culture perceptions across residency programs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Program culture is a highly emphasized attribute across surgery residency programs and throughout trainee recruitment. A positive program culture has been linked to increased resident satisfaction, perceptions of improved program support, and reduced resident burnout and attrition. The aim of this study was to evaluate trends in program culture across residency programs and to identify differences in culture perceptions between residents and faculty members.

Methods

This was a multi-institutional study involving seven general surgery residency programs. Faculty and residents completed a 29-item program culture inventory which was divided into four distinct dimensions: Authoritative, Self-directed, Empowering, and Relational. Dimensions were rated on a scale of 1–5, with 1 being “Not at all accurate” and 5 being “Very accurate.” Statistical analyses were assessed via independent t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

A total of 124 subject matter experts (SME, 95 faculty and 29 senior residents) across seven general surgery residency programs completed the program culture inventory. Each program had an average of 18 SMEs (range 8–38). Average ratings across the four dimensions ranged from 2.53 to 4.03. Collectively, programs were rated lowest in the Empowering dimension, which evaluated whether trainees felt encouraged to identify opportunities for leading and taking initiative. Programs were rated highest under the Relational dimension, which assessed interpersonal support and relationship with peers. Programs shared similar perceptions of Self-directed, Empowering, and Relational culture. However, there was a significant difference in the degree of perceived Authoritative culture across programs (p < 0.05, CI 0.03–1.26). Faculty members tended to rate their program as less Authoritative (2.71 versus 3.14, p < 0.05; CI − 1.14 to − 0.25) compared to residents.

Conclusion

Surgery residency programs differ significantly in the perception of Authoritative attributes among residents and faculty. Further evaluation of leadership styles can offer opportunities to create a more cohesive and favorable culture in residency programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Any additional data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, JHC.

References

  1. Bing-You R, Ramani S, Ramesh S, et al. The interplay between residency program culture and feedback culture: a cross-sectional study exploring perceptions of residents at three institutions. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1611296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1611296.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bongiovanni T, Yeo H, Sosa JA, et al. Attrition from surgical residency training: perspectives from those who left. Am J Surg. 2015;210(4):648–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Costa P, Harris L, Rothstein DH, et al. Dissecting a department of surgery: exploring organizational culture and competency expectations. Am J Surg. 2021;221(2):298–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoff TJ, Pohl H, Bartfield J. Creating a learning environment to produce competent residents: the roles of culture and context. Acad Med. 2004;79(6). https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2004/06000/Creating_a_Learning_Environment_to_Produce.7.aspx

  5. Pololi LH, Evans AT, Civian JT, Shea S, Brennan RT. Assessing the culture of residency using the C-change resident survey: validity evidence in 34 US Residency Programs. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(7):783–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4038-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Salles A, Liebert CA, Greco RS. Promoting balance in the lives of resident physicians: a call to action. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(7):607–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allaire Y, Firsirotu ME. Theories of organizational culture. Organ Stud. 1984;5(3):193–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068400500301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meek V. Organizational culture: origins and weaknesses. Org Stud. 1988;9:453–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068800900401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chatman JA, O’Reilly CA. Paradigm lost: reinvigorating the study of organizational culture. Res Organ Behav. 2016;36:199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooke RA, Rousseau DM. Behavioral norms and expectations: a quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group Org Stud. 1988;13(3):245–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118801300302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xenikou A, Simosi M. Organizational culture and transformational leadership as predictors of business unit performance. J Manag Psychol. 2006;21(6):566–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610684409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Verquer ML, Beehr TA, Wagner SH. A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes. J Vocat Behav. 2003;63(3):473–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00036-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Silverthorne C. The impact of organizational culture and person-organization fit on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadersh Org Dev J. 2004;25(7):592–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410561477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meterko M, Mohr DC, Young GJ. Teamwork culture and patient satisfaction in hospitals. Med Care. 2004;42(5):492–498. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4640779

  15. Mahl S, Lee SK, Baker GR, Cronin CMG, Stevens B, Ye XY. The association of organizational culture and quality improvement implementation with neonatal outcomes in the NICU. J Pediatr Health Care. 2015;29(5):435–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Appelbaum NP, Dow A, Mazmanian PE, Jundt DK, Appelbaum EN. The effects of power, leadership and psychological safety on resident event reporting. Med Educ. 2016;50(3):343–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Appelbaum NP, Lee N, Amendola M, Dodson K, Kaplan B. Surgical resident burnout and job satisfaction: the role of workplace climate and perceived support. J Surg Res. 2019;234:20–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jippes M, Driessen EW, Broers NJ, Majoor GD, Gijselaers WH, van der Vleuten CPM. Culture matters in successful curriculum change: an international study of the influence of national and organizational culture tested with multilevel structural equation modeling. Acad Med. 2015;90(7):921–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Surgery Milestones.; 2019.

  20. Swendiman RA, Hoffman DI, Bruce AN, Blinman TA, Nance ML, Chou CM. Qualities and methods of highly effective surgical educators: a grounded theory model. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(5):1293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ellis RJ, Nicolas JD, Cheung E, et al. Comprehensive characterization of the general surgery residency learning environment and the association with resident burnout. Ann Surg. 2021;274(1). https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/2021/07000/Comprehensive_Characterization_of_the_General.3.aspx

  22. Cooke RA, Szumal JL. Using the organizational culture inventory to understand the operating cultures of organizations. Handb Org Cult Clim. 2000;4:1032–45.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cooke RA, Szumal JL. Measuring normative beliefs and shared behavioral expectations in organizations: the reliability and validity of the organizational culture inventory. Psychol Rep. 1993;72(3_suppl):1299–330. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3c.1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Conger JA, Kanungo RN. The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev. 1988;13(3):471–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/258093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, Hu YY, et al. An empirical national assessment of the learning environment and factors associated with program culture. Ann Surg. 2019;270(4). https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/2019/10000/An_Empirical_National_Assessment_of_the_Learning.2.aspx

  26. Musselman LJ, MacRae HM, Reznick RK, Lingard LA. ‘You learn better under the gun’: intimidation and harassment in surgical education. Med Educ. 2005;39(9):926–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02247.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Elmore LC, Jeffe DB, Jin L, Awad MM, Turnbull IR. National survey of burnout among US General Surgery Residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(3). https://journals.lww.com/journalacs/Fulltext/2016/09000/National_Survey_of_Burnout_among_US_General.2.aspx

  28. Fulford MD, Enz CA. The impact of empowerment on service employees. J Manag Issues. 1995;7(2):161–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40604059

  29. Sigler TH, Pearson CM. Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. J Qual Manag. 2000;5(1):27–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-8568(00)00011-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lai J, Schnapp B, Tillman D, Westergaard M, Hess J, Kraut A. Use of graded responsibility and common entrustment considerations among United States emergency medicine residency programs. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:11. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1176–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. The American Board of Surgery. Training Requirements. Published 2023. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://www.absurgery.org/?certgsqe_training

  33. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in general surgery.; 2022. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/440_generalsurgery_2022.pdf

  34. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) Program. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://www.acgme.org/initiatives/clinical-learning-environment-review-cler/

  35. Mischel W. Personality and assessment. Oxford: Wiley; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bate P. Changing the culture of a hospital: from hierarchy to networked community. Public Adm. 2000;78(3):485–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sanfilippo F, Bendapudi N, Rucci A, Schlesinger L. Strong leadership and teamwork drive culture and performance change: Ohio State University Medical Center 2000–2006. Acad Med. 2008;83:845–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181d2e7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sanfilippo F, Burns KH, Borowitz MJ, Jackson JB, Hruban RH. The Johns Hopkins Department of Pathology novel organizational model: a 25-year-old ongoing experiment. Acad Pathol. 2018;5:2374289518811145. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289518811145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Vitous CA, Shubeck S, Kanters A, Mulholland M, Dimick JB. Reflections on a leadership development program: Impacts on culture in a surgical environment. Surgery. 2019;166(5):721–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cottingham AH, Suchman AL, Litzelman DK, et al. Enhancing the informal curriculum of a medical school: a case study in organizational culture change. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(6):715–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0543-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mcalearney A, Fisher D, Heiser K, Robbins D, Kelleher K. Developing effective physician leaders: changing cultures and transforming organizations. Hosp Top. 2005;83:11–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shen MR, Zhuo L, Madison K, et al. How we do it: an innovative general surgery mentoring program. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(5):1088–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Miles VP, Schroll RW, Beaty JS. Empowering the resident learner. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(4):909–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Korndorffer JR, Bellows CF, Tekian A, Harris IB, Downing SM. Effective home laparoscopic simulation training: a preliminary evaluation of an improved training paradigm. Am J Surg. 2012;203(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Appelbaum NP, Lockeman KS, Orr S, et al. Perceived influence of power distance, psychological safety, and team cohesion on team effectiveness. J Interprof Care. 2020;34(1):20–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1633290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(7):941–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Meyerson SL, Sternbach JM, Zwischenberger JB, Bender EM. The effect of gender on resident autonomy in the operating room. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(6):e111–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Meyerson SL, Odell DD, Zwischenberger JB, et al. The effect of gender on operative autonomy in general surgery residents. Surgery. 2019;166(5):738–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Eruchalu CN, He K, Etheridge JC, et al. Gender and racial/ethnic disparities in operative volumes of graduating general surgery residents. J Surg Res. 2022;279:104–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Eruchalu CN, Etheridge JC, Hammaker AC, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in operative experience among general surgery residents: a multi-institutional study from the US ROPE Consortium. Ann Surg. Published online 9900. https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/fulltext/9900/racial_and_ethnic_disparities_in_operative.405.aspx

  51. Hoops H, Heston A, Dewey E, Spight D, Brasel K, Kiraly L. Resident autonomy in the operating room: does gender matter? Am J Surg. 2019;217(2):301–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gerull KM, Loe M, Seiler K, McAllister J, Salles A. Assessing gender bias in qualitative evaluations of surgical residents. Am J Surg. 2019;217(2):306–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.09.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Eruchalu CN, Etheridge JC, Hammaker AC, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in operative experience among general surgery residents: a multi-institutional study from the US ROPE Consortium. Ann Surg. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer H. Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Drs. Gardner and Costa provide advice on selection & assessment through SurgWise. Dr. Chen has no conflicts of interest to report.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J.H., Costa, P. & Gardner, A. Do you see what I see?: exploring trends in organizational culture perceptions across residency programs. Global Surg Educ 3, 34 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-024-00230-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-024-00230-z

Keywords

Navigation