Abstract
Limited international authorship in psychological journals is one indicator of the need for greater internationalization of research in psychology. This paper is a review of six international large-scale recurring survey programs with open access to data with regard to their contributions to international research collaborations and publications in psychology. These programs are the International Social Survey Programme, the World Values Survey, Children’s Worlds: International Survey of Children’s Well-Being, the Programme for International Student Assessment, the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies, and the Skills Toward Employment and Productivity Measurement Programme. Each program is described in terms of the stages of research (planning and standard setting, instrumentation, data-gathering procedures and quality control, data access and user support) and its development and expansion through the years. The ensuing research outputs and journal publications have international authorship and have analyzed the survey data to address broad, international issues in psychology. These programs exemplify features that encourage and facilitate international collaborations and publications in psychology: an international collaborative network that gathers comprehensive data from large nationally diverse samples over the years, provisions for open, unrestricted access to data, survey documentation, and user support.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No data sets were generated or analyzed for this manuscript; data sharing is not applicable. Materials pertaining to the surveys reviewed in this manuscript are in the survey programs’ websites, which are cited in the manuscript.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Notes
That there are markedly fewer publications using the ISSP data is due to the fact that many more of the publications are sociological, political, or economic, rather than psychological, in analysis and perspective, and we have not included these publications in the count. The ISCWeB, the PIAAC, and the STEP, which started later, generated fewer publications than the WVS and the PISA. The first data collections of the ISCWeB, the PIAAC, and the STEP were in 2011, 2011, and 2012, respectively, whereas, the first data collections of the WVS and the PISA were in 1981 and 2000, respectively. The few publications using the STEP data possibly are indicative of the higher frequency of research outputs in developed countries than in developing countries (of which the STEP data are about).
References
Adair, J. G., Coělho, A. E., & Luna, J. R. (2002). How international is psychology? International Journal of Psychology, 37(3), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590143000351
American Psychological Association (n.d.a). APA PsycArticles. Retrieved November 18, 2022, from https://apa.org/pubs/databases/psycarticles
American Psychological Association (n.d.b). Survey. APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved November 28, 2022, from https://dictionary.apa.org/surveys
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%. Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602
Center for Open Science (n.d.). Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://cos.io
Children’s Worlds: International Survey of Children’s Well-Being (n.d.). Retrieved September 24, 2021, from https://isciweb.org
Collaborative Replications and Education Project (n.d.). Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://osf.io/wfc6u/wiki/home/
García-Martínez, A. T., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. D. (2012). World scientific production in psychology. Universitas Psychologica, 11(3), 699–717.
GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (n.d.). International Social Survey Programme. Retrieved September 24, 2021, from https://gesis.org/en/issp/home
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. A. (2018). Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
International Social Survey Programme (n.d.). Retrieved September 24, 2021, from https://issp.org
Klein, V., Savas, Ö., & Conley, T. (2021). How weird and androcentric is sex research? Global inequities in study populations. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1918050
Montero, M., & Sonn, C. C. (2009). About liberation and psychology: An introduction. In M. Montero & C. C. Sonn (Eds.), Psychology of liberation. Theory and applications (pp. 1–10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85784-8_1
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (n.d.a). Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://oecd.org/pisa
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (n.d.b). Programme for International Student Assessment. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://oecd.org/skills/piaac
Pelham, B., Hardin, C., Murray, D., Shimizu, M., & Vandello, J. (2022). A truly global, non-weird examination of collectivism: The global collectivism index (GCI). Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 3, 10030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2021.100030
Piocuda, J. E., Smyers, J. O., Knyshev, E., Harris, R. J., & Rai, M. (2015). Trends of internationalization and collaboration in US psychology journals 1950–2010. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 3(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000020
Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–171.
Psychological Science Accelerator (n.d.). Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://psysciacc.org/
Puthillam, A., Doble, L. J. M., Santos, J. J. I. D., Elsherif, M. M., Steltenpohl, C. N., Moreau, D., Pownall, M., & Kapoor, H. (2022). Guidelines to improve internationalization in psychological science. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2u4h5
Scopus (n.d.). Retrieved November 18, 2022, from https://scopus.com
Scott, K. M., & Kline, M. (2019). Enabling confirmatory secondary data analysis by logging data checkout. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918815849
Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American? American Psychologist, 76(1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000622
Van de Vijver, F. J. (2013). Contributions of internationalization to psychology: Toward a global and inclusive discipline. American Psychologist, 68(8), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033762
Wagge, J. R., Brandt, M. J., Lazarevic, L. B., Legate, N., Christopherson, C., Wiggins, B., & Grahe, J. E. (2019). Publishing research with undergraduate students via replication work: The collaborative replications and education project. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00247
Webster, G. D., Nichols, A. L., & Schember, T. O. (2009). American psychology is becoming more international. American Psychologist, 64(6), 566–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016193
Weston, S. J., Ritchie, S. J., Rohrer, J. M., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919848684
The World Bank (n.d.a). The STEP Skills Measurement Programme. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/step/about
The World Bank (n.d.b). World Bank country and lending groups. Retrieved November 20, 2022, from https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
The World Values Survey (n.d.) Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://worldvaluessurvey.org
Acknowledgements
We thank Lancelot Lyle de Jesus for his work on PsycArticles and Scopus search and publication categorization and tallying.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Reyes, M.L., Daganzo, M.A.A. & Calleja, M.O. International Large-Scale Recurring Surveys with Open Access to Data: Contributions to International Research Collaborations and Publications in Psychology. Trends in Psychol. 31, 561–581 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00273-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00273-z