Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term lymphocyte subset number reconstitution is unique but comparable between umbilical cord blood and unrelated bone marrow transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of umbilical cord blood transplantation (U-CBT) procedures has been growing annually, but little research has been done on long-term immune recovery after U-CBT. Infection risk is high in U-CBT recipients, and this can be partially attributed to immature immunocompetent cells in umbilical cord blood. In this study, we analyzed lymphocyte subset (LST) number to determine the long-term recovery timeline. We included 36 U-CBT and 10 unrelated bone marrow transplantation (U-BMT) recipients who survived more than 2 years after transplantation, and followed them for up to 10 years post-transplant. Recovery kinetics in the early phase post-transplant was different for each LST. Recovery of CD19+ B cells was faster after U-CBT than after U-BMT in the first 5 years after transplantation. Although CD4+ T cells increased in the first several months after U-CBT, long-term cell count recovery was impaired in approximately 20% of patients. Thus, although the LST recovery pattern after U-CBT was unique, LST number recovery was statistically comparable between U-CBT and U-BMT past 5 years post-transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, S. Takagi, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Tomblyn M, Chiller T, Einsele H, Gress R, Sepkowitz K, Storek J, et al. Guidelines for preventing infectious complications among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a global perspective. Preface Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44(8):453–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Valiathan R, Deeb K, Diamante M, Ashman M, Sachdeva N, Asthana D. Reference ranges of lymphocyte subsets in healthy adults and adolescents with special mention of T cell maturation subsets in adults of South Florida. Immunobiology. 2014;219(7):487–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roux E, Dumont-Girard F, Starobinski M, Siegrist CA, Helg C, Chapuis B, et al. Recovery of immune reactivity after T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation depends on thymic activity. Blood. 2000;96(6):2299–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindemans CA, Chiesa R, Amrolia PJ, Rao K, Nikolajeva O, de Wildt A, et al. Impact of thymoglobulin prior to pediatric unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation on immune reconstitution and clinical outcome. Blood. 2014;123(1):126–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakatani K, Imai K, Shigeno M, Sato H, Tezuka M, Okawa T, et al. Cord blood transplantation is associated with rapid B-cell neogenesis compared with BM transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(9):1155–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shima T, Miyamoto T, Kikushige Y, Mori Y, Kamezaki K, Takase K, et al. Quantitation of hematogones at the time of engraftment is a useful prognostic indicator in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2013;121(5):840–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Comans-Bitter WM, de Groot R, van den Beemd R, Neijens HJ, Hop WC, Groeneveld K, et al. Immunophenotyping of blood lymphocytes in childhood. Reference values for lymphocyte subpopulations. J Pediatr. 1997;130(3):388–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris DT, Schumacher MJ, Locascio J, Besencon FJ, Olson GB, DeLuca D, et al. Phenotypic and functional immaturity of human umbilical cord blood T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89(21):10006–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Grindebacke H, Stenstad H, Quiding-Jarbrink M, Waldenstrom J, Adlerberth I, Wold AE, et al. Dynamic development of homing receptor expression and memory cell differentiation of infant CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2009;183(7):4360–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuno N, Yamamoto H, Watanabe N, Uchida N, Ota H, Nishida A, et al. Rapid T-cell chimerism switch and memory T-cell expansion are associated with pre-engraftment immune reaction early after cord blood transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2013;160(2):255–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuasa M, Asano-Mori Y, Mitsuki T, Yamaguchi K, Kageyama K, Kaji D, et al. Prognostic significance of lymphocyte reconstitution in the early phase after cord blood transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2021;193(2):423–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Politikos I, Lavery JA, Hilden P, Cho C, Borrill T, Maloy MA, et al. Robust CD4+ T-cell recovery in adults transplanted with cord blood and no antithymocyte globulin. Blood Adv. 2020;4(1):191–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Moretta A, Andriolo G, Lisini D, Martinetti M, Pasi A, Rebulla P, et al. In vitro evaluation of graft-versus-graft alloreactivity as a tool to identify the predominant cord blood unit before double cord blood transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(7):1108–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients and the donors. We also thank physicians, nurses, pharmacists, transplantation coordinator (Ms. Madoka Narita, Ms. Rumiko Tsuchihashi, Ms. Tomoko Amemiya, Ms. Rina Hino), data managers (Ms. Kaori Kobayashi), secretariat member of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Promotion Base Hospital Project (Ms. Naomi Watanabe), and support personnel for their care of the patients involved in the study. We publish this paper with deep gratitude and condolences to Dr. Akiko Yoneyama, who has been the director of the Department of Clinical Laboratory and the Department of Infectious Diseases in Toranomon Hospital. She supported and contributed greatly to the development of umbilical cord blood transplantation at Toranomon Hospital from its earliest days and was a dedicated clinical and research physician. She also laid the foundation for the seamless collaboration between Hematology and Clinical Laboratory and Infectious Diseases Departments in Toranomon Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K. Tsumita, S. Takagi and Y. Koike are principal investigators and take primary responsibility for the paper; K. Tsumita, S. Takagi and Y. Koike wrote the manuscript; S. Takagi, Y.A-M, O.W., M.E., K.Y., M.Y., K.K., D.K., Y.T., A.N., K.I., H.Y., G.Y., A.W., N.U., S. Taniguchi treated patients and reviewed the final manuscript; H.A. and S.M. reviewed the final manuscript; N. Uchida, S. Taniguchi and Y. Koike organized the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukako Koike.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12185_2024_3727_MOESM1_ESM.pptx

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 325 KB) Figure S1 Representatives flowcytometry for each lymphocyte subset. Figure S2 Comparison of immune reconstitution of each lineage after umbilical cord blood transplantation, GVHD prophylaxis method. Figure S3 Comparison of immune reconstitution of each lineage after umbilical cord blood transplantation, acute GVHD severity. Figure S4 Comparison of immune reconstitution of each lineage after umbilical cord blood transplantation, chronic GVHD severity. Figure S5 Comparison of immune reconstitution of CD8+ T cells after umbilical cord blood transplantation, transplanted unit number

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsumita, K., Takagi, S., Asano-Mori, Y. et al. Long-term lymphocyte subset number reconstitution is unique but comparable between umbilical cord blood and unrelated bone marrow transplantation. Int J Hematol 119, 573–582 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-024-03727-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-024-03727-x

Keywords

Navigation