Mathematics instructor actions and knowledge integration: utilizing resources in mathematics courses for teachers

• Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Education Research Journal 14(4). 367–381.

• Arbaugh, F., Graysay, D., Konuk, N., & Freeburn, B. (2019). The three-minute-rehearsal cycle of enactment and investigation: Preservice secondary mathematics teachers learning to elicit and use evidence of student thinking. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 8(1), 22–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 241–247.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barker, D. D., Lannin, J. K., Winsor, M. S., & Kirwan, J. V. (2019). Integrating knowledge for instruction: A tale of two teachers. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1), 331–358.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barker, D. D., Winsor, M. S., Kirwan, J. V., & Rupnow, T. J. (2020). Searching for the key to knowledge integration. In T. Lehmann (Ed.), International Perspectives on Knowledge Integration: Theory, research, and good practice in pre-service teacher and higher education (pp. 59–78). Brill Sense.

• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.

• Battista, M. T. (1999). Fifth graders enumeration of cubes in 3D arrays: Conceptual progress in an inquiry-based classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 417–448.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E., & Shavelson, R. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chamberlin, M. (2009). Teacher’s reflections on their mathematical learning experiences in a professional development course. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 11, 22–35.

  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. American Education Research Journal 25(2). 119–142.

• Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences [CBMS] (2001). The mathematical education of teachers Providence, RI and Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.

• Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences [CBMS] (2012). The Mathematical Education of Teachers II. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

• Feldman, A. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Research, 32, 26–28.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Frykohlm, J. A. (1999). The impact of reform: Challenges for mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 79–105.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.

  Google Scholar 

• Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers. Boston, MA: Pearson.

  Google Scholar 

• Gottein, H. P. (2020). Closing the gap: An innovative learning environment for enabling pre-service teachers to put theoretical knowledge into action. In T. Lehmann (Ed.), International perspectives on knowledge integration: Theory, research, and good practice in preservice teacher and higher education (pp. 231–254). Brill Sense.

• Graziano, M. S. A. (2022). A conceptual framework for consciousness. Pnas, 19(18), e2116933119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116933119

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harr, N., Eichler, A., & Renkyl, A. (2014). Integrating pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical/psychological knowledge in mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology, Article 924, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00924. 5.

• Harr, N., Eichler, A., & Renkyl, A. (2015). Integrated learning: Ways of fostering the applicability of teachers’ pedagogical and psychological knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, Article 738, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00738. 6.

• Herman, W. E. (1998). Promoting pedagogical reasoning as preservice teachers analyze case vignettes. Journal of Teacher Education, 49(5), 391–397.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Janssen, N., & Lazonder, A. W. (2016). Supporting pre-service teachers in designing technology-infused lesson plans. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 456–467.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Klein, F. (2016). Elementary mathematics from a higher standpoint: Arithmetic, algebra, analysis. Trans.). Springer. (Original work published 1924)G. Schubring.

• Kontorovich, I., & Ovadiya, T. (2023). How narratives about the secondary-tertiary transition shape undergraduate tutors’ sense-making of their teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113, 125–146.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, J., & Turner, J. E. (2017). Extensive knowledge integration strategies in pre-service teachers: The role of perceived instrumentality, motivation, and self-regulation. Educational Studies, 44(5), 505–520.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lehmann, T. (2020). What is knowledge integration of multiple domains and how does it relate to teachers’ professional competence? In T. Lehmann (Ed.), International Perspectives on Knowledge Integration: Theory, research, and good practice in pre-service teacher and higher education (pp. 9–29). Brill Sense.

• Lehmann, T., Rott, B., & Schmidt-Borcherding, F. (2019). Promoting pre–service teachers’ integration of professional knowledge: Effects of writing tasks and prompts on learning from multiple documents. Instructional Science, 47, 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9472-2

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lehmann, T., Pirnay-Dummer, P., & Schmidt-Borcherding, F. (2020). Fostering integrated mental models of different professional knowledge domains: Instructional approaches and model-based analyses. Education Tech Research Development, 68, 905–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09704-0

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Levasseur, K., & Cuoco, A. (2003). Mathematical habits of mind. In H. Schoen, & R. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades 6–12 (pp. 27–38). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindmeier, A. (2011). Modeling and measuring knowledge and competences of teachers. Münster: Waxmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindmeier, A., Seemann, S., Kuratli-Geeler, S., Wullschleger, A., Dunekacke, S., Leuchter, M., Vogt, F., Moser Opitz, E., & Heinze, A. (2020). Modeling early childhood teachers’ mathematics-specific professional competence and its differential growth through professional development—an aspect of structural validity. Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 168–187.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.

• Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 12–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Nickerson, C. (2021). December 6). The role of a Schema in psychology. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/what-is-a-schema.html

• Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1976). Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: Three modes of learning Report No. 7602. (ED134902) ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED134902.pdf

• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Sherman, U. P., & Morley, M. J. (2015). On the formation of the psychological contract: A schema theory perspective. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 160–192.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Steele, M., & Hillen, A. (2012). The content-focused methods course: A model for integrating pedagogy and mathematics content. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1, 53–70.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–98.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vanassche, E., & Keltchermans, G. (2016). Facilitating self-study of teacher education practices: Toward a pedagogy of teacher educator professional development. Professional Development in Education, 42, 100–122.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025125

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wäschle, K., Lehmann, T., Brauch, N., & Nückles, M. (2015). Prompted journal writing supports preservice history teachers in drawing on multiple knowledge domains for designing learning tasks. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 546–559.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Widmayer, S. A. (2001). Schema theory: An introduction. Retrieved December 16, 2022. https://docplayer.net/21424460-Schema-theory-an-introduction-sharon-alayne-widmayer-george-mason-university.html

• Winsor, M., Kirwan, J. V., & Ssebaggala, L. (2018). What do we know about secondary mathematics teacher preparation in the United States? The Mathematics Educator, 27(2), 73–106.

  Google Scholar 

• Winsor, M. S., Barker, D. D., & Kirwan, J. V. (2020). Promoting knowledge integration in teacher education programs. In T. Lehmann (Ed.), International Perspectives on Knowledge Integration: Theory, research, and good practice in pre-service teacher and higher education (pp. 349–369). Brill Sense.

• Zazkis, R., & Kontorovich, I. (2016). A curious case of superscript (-1): Prospective secondary mathematics teachers explain. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 98–110.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zeichner, Z. (1996). Designing Educative Practicum Experiences for prospective teachers. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. L. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 215–234). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  Google Scholar 

Download references