Abstract
The Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) Index stands as a crucial geomagnetic metric, serving to quantify the intensity of geomagnetic disturbances. The accurate prediction of the Dst index plays a pivotal role in mitigating the detrimental effects caused by severe space-weather events. Therefore, Dst prediction has been a long-standing focal point within the realms of space physics and space-weather forecasting. In this study, a Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) is deployed in tandem with the Integrated Gradient (IG) algorithm to predict the Dst index and scrutinize its associated physical processes. With these two components, our model can give the contribution of each input parameter to the outcome along with the forecast. The TCN component of our model utilizes interplanetary observational data, encompassing the vector magnetic field, solar-wind velocity, proton temperature, proton density, interplanetary electric field, and other relevant parameters for forecasting Dst indices. Despite the disparity in test sets, our model’s forecast accuracy approximates the error levels of the prior models. Remarkably, the prediction error of these machine-learning models has become comparable to the inherent error between the Dst index itself and the actual ring-current strength.
To understand the physical process behind the forecasting model, the IG algorithm was applied in our prediction model, in an attempt to analyze the underlying physical process of the machine-learning black box. In the temporal dimension, it is evident that the more recent the time, the more substantial the influence on the final prediction. Regarding the physical parameters, besides the historical Dst index itself, the flow pressure, the \(z\)-component of the magnetic field, and the proton density all significantly contribute to the final prediction. Additionally, IG attributions were analyzed for subsets of data, including different Dst-index ranges, different observation times, and different interplanetary structures. Most of the subsets exhibit an IG matrix with deviations from the mean distribution, which indicates a complex nonlinear system and sensitivity of the prediction to input values. These analyses align with physical reasoning and are in good agreement with previous research. The results affirm that the TCN+IG technique not only enhances space-weather forecast accuracy but also advances our comprehension of the underlying physical processes in space weather.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig18_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig19_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11207-024-02340-9/MediaObjects/11207_2024_2340_Fig20_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Abduallah, Y., Wang, J.T.L., Bose, P., Zhang, G., Gerges, F., Wang, H.: 2022, Forecasting the disturbance storm time index with bayesian deep learning. Int. FLAIRS Conf. Proc. 35. DOI.
Akasofu, S.-I.: 1981, Prediction of development of geomagnetic storms using the solar wind-magnetosphere energy coupling function \(\epsilon \). Planet. Space Sci. 29, 1151. DOI.
Ancona, M., Ceolini, E., Öztireli, C., Gross, M.: 2017, Towards Better Understanding of Gradient-Based Attribution Methods for Deep Neural Networks. ArXiv. DOI.
Asensio Ramos, A., Cheung, M.C.M., Chifu, I., Gafeira, R.: 2023, Machine learning in solar physics. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 20, 4. DOI.
Baehrens, D., Schroeter, T., Harmeling, S., Kawanabe, M., Hansen, K., Mueller, K.-R.: 2009, How to Explain Individual Classification Decisions. ArXiv.
Bai, S., Kolter, J.Z., Koltun, V.: 2018, An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling. arXiv [cs].
Boynton, R.J., Balikhin, M.A., Billings, S.A., Sharma, A.S., Amariutei, O.A.: 2011, Data derived NARMAX Dst model. Ann. Geophys. 29, 965. DOI.
Branco, P., Torgo, L., Ribeiro, R.: 2015, A Survey of Predictive Modelling under Imbalanced Distributions. ArXiv.
Buhrmester, V., Münch, D., Arens, M.: 2021, Analysis of explainers of black box deep neural networks for computer vision: a survey. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 3, 966. DOI.
Burton, R.K., McPherron, R.L., Russell, C.T.: 1975, An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst. J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4204. DOI.
Cai, L., Ma, S.Y., Zhou, Y.L.: 2010, Prediction of SYM-H index during large storms by NARX neural network from IMF and solar wind data. Ann. Geophys. 28, 381. DOI.
Chi, Y., Shen, C., Wang, Y., Xu, M., Ye, P., Wang, S.: 2016, Statistical study of the interplanetary coronal mass ejections from 1995 to 2015. Solar Phys. 291, 2419. DOI.
Chi, Y., Shen, C., Luo, B., Wang, Y., Xu, M.: 2018, Geoeffectiveness of stream interaction regions from 1995 to 2016. Adv. Space Res. 16, 1960. DOI.
Chi, Y., Shen, C., Scott, C., Xu, M., Owens, M., Wang, Y., Lockwood, M.: 2022, Predictive capabilities of corotating interaction regions using STEREO and wind in-situ observations. Adv. Space Res. 20, e2022SW003112. DOI.
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: 2014, Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling. arXiv [cs].
Cliver, E.W., Kamide, Y., Ling, A.G.: 2000, Mountains versus valleys: semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 105, 2413. DOI.
Daly, E.J.: 2005, Outlook on space weather effects on spacecraft. In: Daglis, I.A. (ed.) Effects of Space Weather on Technology Infrastructure 91, Springer, Dordrecht, 978.
Dang, T., Li, X., Luo, B., Li, R., Zhang, B., Pham, K., Ren, D., Chen, X., Lei, J., Wang, Y.: 2022, Unveiling the space weather during the starlink satellites destruction event on 4 February 2022. Adv. Space Res. 20, e2022SW003152. DOI.
Echer, E., Gonzalez, W.D., Alves, M.V.: 2006, On the geomagnetic effects of solar wind interplanetary magnetic structures. Adv. Space Res. 4, 2005SW000200. DOI.
Elman, J.L.: 1990, Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14, 179. DOI.
Fox, N.J., Velli, M.C., Bale, S.D., Decker, R., Driesman, A., Howard, R.A., Kasper, J.C., Kinnison, J., Kusterer, M., Lario, D., Lockwood, M.K., McComas, D.J., Raouafi, N.E., Szabo, A.: 2016, The solar probe plus mission: humanity’s first visit to our star. Space Sci. Rev. 204, 7. DOI.
Gleisner, H., Lundstedt, H., Wintoft, P.: 1996, Predicting geomagnetic storms from solar-wind data using time-delay neural networks. Ann. Geophys. 14, 679. DOI.
Gonzalez, W.D., Echer, E.: 2005, A study on the peak dst and peak negative bz relationship during intense geomagnetic storms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 2005GL023486. DOI.
Gonzalez, W.D., Joselyn, J.A., Kamide, Y., Kroehl, H.W., Rostoker, G., Tsurutani, B.T., Vasyliunas, V.M.: 1994, What is a geomagnetic storm? J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 99, 5771. DOI.
Gopalswamy, N., Barbieri, L., Cliver, E.W., Lu, G., Plunkett, S.P., Skoug, R.M.: 2005, Introduction to violent Sun-Earth connection events of October–November 2003. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 110, 2005JA011268. DOI.
Gruet, M.A., Chandorkar, M., Sicard, A., Camporeale, E.: 2018, Multiple-hour-ahead forecast of the dst index using a combination of long short-term memory neural network and Gaussian process. Adv. Space Res. 16, 1882. DOI.
Hapgood, M., Liu, H., Lugaz, N.: 2022, SpaceX—sailing close to the space weather? Adv. Space Res. 20, e2022SW003074. DOI.
Harris, C.R., Millman, K.J., Van Der Walt, S.J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N.J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., Van Kerkwijk, M.H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., Del Río, J.F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., Gérard-Marchant, P., Sheppard, K., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Abbasi, H., Gohlke, C., Oliphant, T.E.: 2020, Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357. DOI.
He, H., Garcia, E.A.: 2009, Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 21, 1263. DOI.
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: 2016, Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 770, 1063. DOI.
Heirtzler, J.R., Allen, J.H., Wilkinson, D.C.: 2002, Ever-present South Atlantic anomaly damages spacecraft. Eos Trans. AGU 83, 165. DOI.
Hewage, P., Behera, A., Trovati, M., Pereira, E., Ghahremani, M., Palmieri, F., Liu, Y.: 2020, Temporal Convolutional Neural (TCN) network for an effective weather forecasting using time-series data from the local weather station. Soft Comput. 24, 16453. DOI.
Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: 1997, Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735. DOI.
Hu, A., Camporeale, E., Swiger, B.: 2023, Multi-hour-ahead Dst index prediction using multi-fidelity boosted neural networks. Adv. Space Res. 21, e2022SW003286. DOI.
Hunter, J.D.: 2007, Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90. DOI.
Hutter, F., Hoos, H.H., Leyton-Brown, K.: 2011, Sequential model-based optimization for general algorithm configuration. In: Coello, C.A.C. (ed.) Learning and Intelligent Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6683, Springer, Berlin, 978. DOI.
Kaiser, M.L., Kucera, T.A., Davila, J.M., St.Cyr, O.C., Guhathakurta, M., Christian, E.: 2008, The STEREO mission: an introduction. Space Sci. Rev. 136, 5. DOI.
Kappenman, J.G.: 2005, An overview of the impulsive geomagnetic field disturbances and power grid impacts associated with the violent sun-Earth connection events of 29-31 October 2003 and a comparative evaluation with other contemporary storms. Adv. Space Res. 3, 2004SW000128. DOI.
King, J.H., Papitashvili, N.E.: 2005, Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 110, 2004JA010649. DOI.
Krawczyk, B.: 2016, Learning from Imbalanced Data: Open Challenges and Future Directions, Lect. Notes. Artif. Int. 5, 221. DOI.
Lazzús, J.A., Vega, P., Rojas, P., Salfate, I.: 2017, Forecasting the Dst index using a swarm-optimized neural network: forecasting the Dst index using ANN+PSO. Adv. Space Res. 15, 1068. DOI.
Lethy, A., El-Eraki, M.A., Samy, A., Deebes, H.A.: 2018, Prediction of the Dst index and analysis of its dependence on solar wind parameters using neural network. Adv. Space Res. 16, 1277. DOI.
Li, Y.Y., Huang, S.Y., Xu, S.B., Yuan, Z.G., Jiang, K., Wei, Y.Y., Zhang, J., Xiong, Q.Y., Wang, Z., Lin, R.T., Yu, L.: 2022, Selection of the main control parameters for the Dst index prediction model based on a layer-wise relevance propagation method. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 260, 6. DOI.
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Dollar, P.: 2020, Focal loss for dense object detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 42, 318. DOI.
Lindauer, M., Eggensperger, K., Feurer, M., Biedenkapp, A., Deng, D., Benjamins, C., Ruhkopf, T., Sass, R., Hutter, F.: 2022, SMAC3: a versatile Bayesian optimization package for hyperparameter optimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 23, 1.
Lühr, H., Maus, S.: 2010, Solar cycle dependence of quiet-time magnetospheric currents and a model of their near-Earth magnetic fields. Earth Planets Space 62, 843. DOI.
Lundstedt, H., Wintoft, P.: 1994, Prediction of geomagnetic storms from solar wind data with the use of a neural network. Ann. Geophys. 12, 19. DOI.
Lundstrom, D.D., Huang, T., Razaviyayn, M.: 2022, A rigorous study of integrated gradients method and extensions to internal neuron attributions. In: Chaudhuri, K., Jegelka, S., Song, L., Szepesvari, C., Niu, G., Sabato, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 162, PMLR, 14485.
Mandea, M., Chambodut, A.: 2020, Geomagnetic field processes and their implications for space weather. Surv. Geophys. 41, 1611. DOI.
Mannucci, A.J., Tsurutani, B.T., Iijima, B.A., Komjathy, A., Saito, A., Gonzalez, W.D., Guarnieri, F.L., Kozyra, J.U., Skoug, R.: 2005, Dayside global ionospheric response to the major interplanetary events of October 29–30, 2003 “halloween storms”. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 2004GL021467. DOI.
Microsoft: 2021, Neural Network Intelligence.
Molinski, T.S., Feero, W.E., Damsky, B.L.: 2000, Shielding grids from solar storms [power system protection]. IEEE Spectr. 37, 55. DOI.
Müller, D., St.Cyr, O.C., Zouganelis, I., Gilbert, H.R., Marsden, R., Nieves-Chinchilla, T., Antonucci, E., Auchère, F., Berghmans, D., Horbury, T.S., Howard, R.A., Krucker, S., Maksimovic, M., Owen, C.J., Rochus, P., Rodriguez-Pacheco, J., Romoli, M., Solanki, S.K., Bruno, R., Carlsson, M., Fludra, A., Harra, L., Hassler, D.M., Livi, S., Louarn, P., Peter, H., Schühle, U., Teriaca, L., Del Toro Iniesta, J.C., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R.F., Marsch, E., Velli, M., De Groof, A., Walsh, A., Williams, D.: 2020, The solar orbiter mission – science overview. Astron. Astrophys. 642, A1. DOI.
Mursula, K., Karinen, A.: 2005, Explaining and correcting the excessive semiannual variation in the Dst index. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 2005GL023132. DOI.
Nose, M., Sugiura, M., Kamei, T., Iyemori, T., Koyama, Y.: 2015, Dst Index, WDC for Geomagnetism, Kyoto. DOI.
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., Desmaison, A., Kopf, A., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., Raison, M., Tejani, A., Chilamkurthy, S., Steiner, B., Fang, L., Bai, J., Chintala, S.: 2019, PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Beygelzimer, A., dAlché-Buc, F., Fox, E., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, Curran Associates, Red Hook, 8024.
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E.: 2011, Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825.
Perreault, P., Akasofu, S.-I.: 1978, A study of geomagnetic storms. Geophys. J. Int. 54, 547. DOI.
Pulkkinen, A., Bernabeu, E., Eichner, J., Beggan, C., Thomson, A.W.P.: 2012, Generation of 100-year geomagnetically induced current scenarios. Adv. Space Res. 10, 2011SW000750. DOI.
Russell, C.T., McPherron, R.L., Burton, R.K.: 1974, On the cause of geomagnetic storms. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 1105. DOI.
Schulte In Den Bäumen, H., Moran, D., Lenzen, M., Cairns, I., Steenge, A.: 2014, How severe space weather can disrupt global supply chains. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 14, 2749. DOI.
Shen, C., Chi, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, M., Wang, S.: 2017, Statistical comparison of the ICME���s geoeffectiveness of different types and different solar phases from 1995 to 2014. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 122, 5931. DOI.
Shen, C., Chi, Y., Xu, M., Wang, Y.: 2021, Origin of Extremely Intense Southward Component of Magnetic Field (Bs) in ICMEs, Aip. Conf. Proc. 9, 762488. DOI.
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., Kundaje, A.: 2019, Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences. arXiv [cs].
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., Zisserman, A.: 2014, Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps. ArXiv.
Sugiura, M.: 1963, Hourly Values of Equatorial Dst for the Igy. Technical Report NASA-TM-X-55238.
Sugria, M., Chapman, S.: 1961, The average morphology of geomagnetic storms with sudden commencement. Abhandl, Akad, Wiss, Goettingen Math, Phys., Kl 4, 1.
Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., Yan, Q.: 2017, Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks. arXiv [cs].
Temerin, M., Li, X.: 2015, The dst index underestimates the solar cycle variation of geomagnetic activity. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 120, 5603. DOI.
The pandas development team: 2020, Pandas-Dev/Pandas: Pandas, Zenodo. DOI.
Tsurutani, B.T., Gonzalez, W.D., Kamide, Y., Arballo, J.K.: 1997, Preface. In: Tsurutani, B.T., Gonzalez, W.D., Kamide, Y., Arballo, J.K. (eds.) Geophysical Monograph Series 98, American Geophysical Union, Washington, 978. DOI.
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., Van Der Walt, S.J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K.J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A.R.J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C.J., Polat, İ., Feng, Y., Moore, E.W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E.A., Harris, C.R., Archibald, A.M., Ribeiro, A.H., Pedregosa, F., Van Mulbregt, P., SciPy 1.0 Contributors, Vijaykumar, A., Bardelli, A.P., Rothberg, A., Hilboll, A., Kloeckner, A., Scopatz, A., Lee, A., Rokem, A., Woods, C.N., Fulton, C., Masson, C., Häggström, C., Fitzgerald, C., Nicholson, D.A., Hagen, D.R., Pasechnik, D.V., Olivetti, E., Martin, E., Wieser, E., Silva, F., Lenders, F., Wilhelm, F., Young, G., Price, G.A., Ingold, G.-L., Allen, G.E., Lee, G.R., Audren, H., Probst, I., Dietrich, J.P., Silterra, J., Webber, J.T., Slavič, J., Nothman, J., Buchner, J., Kulick, J., Schönberger, J.L., De Miranda Cardoso, J.V., Reimer, J., Harrington, J., Rodríguez, J.L.C., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Kuczynski, J., Tritz, K., Thoma, M., Newville, M., Kümmerer, M., Bolingbroke, M., Tartre, M., Pak, M., Smith, N.J., Nowaczyk, N., Shebanov, N., Pavlyk, O., Brodtkorb, P.A., Lee, P., McGibbon, R.T., Feldbauer, R., Lewis, S., Tygier, S., Sievert, S., Vigna, S., Peterson, S., More, S., Pudlik, T., Oshima, T., Pingel, T.J., Robitaille, T.P., Spura, T., Jones, T.R., Cera, T., Leslie, T., Zito, T., Krauss, T., Upadhyay, U., Halchenko, Y.O., Vázquez-Baeza, Y. (eds.): 2020, SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat. Methods 17, 261. DOI.
Wang, Y., Shen, C.L., Wang, S., Ye, P.Z.: 2003, An empirical formula relating the geomagnetic storm’s intensity to the interplanetary parameters: – and \(\Delta \) t. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2003GL017901. DOI.
Wang, Y., Ye, P., Zhou, G., Wang, S., Wang, S., Yan, Y., Wang, J.: 2005, The interplanetary responses to the great solar activities in late October 2003. Solar Phys. 226, 337. DOI.
Wang, Y., Bai, X., Chen, C., Chen, L., Cheng, X., Deng, L., Deng, L., Deng, Y., Feng, L., Gou, T., Guo, J., Guo, Y., Hao, X., He, J., Hou, J., Huang, J., Huang, Z., Ji, H., Jiang, C., Jiang, J., Jin, C., Li, X., Li, Y., Liu, J., Liu, K., Liu, L., Liu, R., Liu, R., Qiu, C., Shen, C., Shen, F., Shen, Y., Shi, X., Su, J., Su, Y., Su, Y., Sun, M., Tan, B., Tian, H., Wang, Y., Xia, L., Xie, J., Xiong, M., Xu, M., Yan, X., Yan, Y., Yang, S., Yang, S., Zhang, S., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhou, G., Zou, H.: 2023, Solar ring mission: building a panorama of the sun and inner-heliosphere. Adv. Space Res. 71, 1146. DOI.
Wei, H.L., Zhu, D.Q., Billings, S.A., Balikhin, M.A.: 2007, Forecasting the geomagnetic activity of the Dst index using multiscale radial basis function networks. Adv. Space Res. 40, 1863. DOI.
Wolpert, D.H.: 1992, Stacked generalization. Neural Netw. 5, 241. DOI.
Wu, J.-G., Lundstedt, H.: 1997, Geomagnetic storm predictions from solar wind data with the use of dynamic neural networks. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 102, 14255. DOI.
Xu, S.B., Huang, S.Y., Yuan, Z.G., Deng, X.H., Jiang, K.: 2020, Prediction of the Dst index with bagging ensemble-learning algorithm. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 248, 14. DOI.
Yang, Y., Zha, K., Chen, Y.-C., Wang, H., Katabi, D.: 2021, Delving into deep imbalanced regression. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
Yang, Y., Liu, J.J., Feng, X.S., Chen, P.F., Zhang, B.: 2023, Prediction of the transit time of coronal mass ejections with an ensemble machine-learning method. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 268, 69. DOI.
Yermolaev, Y.I., Yermolaev, M.Y.: 2002, Statistical relationships between solar, interplanetary, and geomagnetospheric disturbances, 1976–2000. Cosm. Res. 40, 1. DOI.
Zhang, J., Feng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, Y.: 2023, The short time prediction of the dst index based on the long-short time memory and empirical mode decomposition–long-short time memory models. Appl. Sci. 13, 11824. DOI.
Zhao, H., Zong, Q., Wei, Y., Wang, Y.: 2011, Influence of solar wind dynamic pressure on geomagnetic Dst index during various magnetic storms. Sci. China, Technol. Sci. 54, 1445. DOI.
Funding
This work is supported by grants from the NSFC (42325405, 42130204, 41904151, 42188101, 42074222) and the Strategic Priority Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB41000000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Junyan Liu and Chenglong Shen wrote the main manuscript. Yang Wang, Mengjiao Xu, Yutian Chi, Zhihui Zhong, Dongwei Mao, Can Wang, Jiajia Liu, and Yuming Wang contributed to the discussions and offered revision suggestions.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Shen, C., Wang, Y. et al. Forecasting the Dst Index with Temporal Convolutional Network and Integrated Gradients. Sol Phys 299, 98 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02340-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-024-02340-9