Abstract
Satellite constellation deployment is a cohesive mission where the trajectories of satellites must be planned concurrently. This paper presents an Integrated Program for Optimal Deployment of a Satellite Constellation (PODSC) consisting of \(m\) non-identical satellites in any desired arrangement in \(n\) orbital planes. The PODSC can optimize the scheduling of mission timelines, ensuring effective coordination with the trajectory of each satellite. This involves meticulous planning that considers temporal constraints and regards collision avoidance constraint. Additionally, the PODSC can select the most favorable deployment strategy, considering the trade-offs between time and fuel consumption across all possible deployment methods. The PODSC also utilizes an innovative Perturbed Multi-impulsive Inclined transfer trajectory Amalgamated with a modified Lambert targeting problem (PMIAL). The main idea of designing the mentioned maneuver is to eliminate the defects of the Lambert Targeting Problem (LTP). The LTP cannot account for space perturbations. Moreover, the LTP faces challenges when attempting to align the transfer trajectory tangentially with the final orbit in situations where there exists a substantial disparity in inclination and right ascension between the initial and final orbits. The PMIAL establishes three consecutive steps to fix the mentioned defects. Balancing the trade-off between time and achieving optimal fuel consumption will be possible by applying a hybrid IWO/PSO (The hybrid Invasive Weed Optimization/Particle Swarm Optimization) optimization algorithm in both PMIAL and PODSC. The case study will involve simulating two constellation deployment missions, with a particular focus on considering the Earth’s oblateness as a notable perturbation; however, the proposed algorithms can consider any space perturbations.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10509-024-04288-5/MediaObjects/10509_2024_4288_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10509-024-04288-5/MediaObjects/10509_2024_4288_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10509-024-04288-5/MediaObjects/10509_2024_4288_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10509-024-04288-5/MediaObjects/10509_2024_4288_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10509-024-04288-5/MediaObjects/10509_2024_4288_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10509-024-04288-5/MediaObjects/10509_2024_4288_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Abbasali, E., Kosari, A., Bakhtiari, M.: Effects of oblateness of the primaries on natural periodic orbit-attitude behaviour of satellites in three body problem. Adv. Space Res. (2021)
Ansari, K., Park, K.-D.: Multi constellation GNSS precise point positioning and prediction of propagation errors using singular spectrum analysis. Astrophys. Space Sci. 363, 1–7 (2018)
Appel, L., Guelman, M., Mishne, D.: Optimization of satellite constellation reconfiguration maneuvers. Acta Astronaut. 99, 166–174 (2014)
Arnas, D., Linares, R.: Uniform satellite constellation reconfiguration. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 1–14 (2022)
Bainum, P.M., Strong, A., Tan, Z., Capó-Lugo, P.A.: Techniques for deploying elliptically orbiting constellations in along-track formation. Acta Astronaut. 57, 685–697 (2005)
Bakhtiari, M., Daneshjou, K., Abbasali, E.: A new approach to derive a formation flying model in the presence of a perturbing body in inclined elliptical orbit: relative hovering analysis. Astrophys. Space Sci. 362 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2968-9
Bakhtiari, M., Abbasali, E., Daneshjoo, K.: Minimum cost perturbed multi-impulsive maneuver methodology to accomplish an optimal deployment scheduling for a satellite constellation. J. Astronaut. Sci. 70, 18 (2023a)
Bakhtiari, M., Abbasali, E., Sabzy, S., Kosari, A.: Natural coupled orbit—attitude periodic motions in the perturbed-CRTBP including radiated primary and oblate secondary. Astrodynamics 7, 229–249 (2023b)
Budianto, I.A., Olds, J.R.: Design and deployment of a satellite constellation using collaborative optimization. J. Spacecr. Rockets 41, 956–963 (2004)
Casanova, D., Avendano, M.E., Mortari, D.: Design of flower constellations using necklaces. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 50, 1347–1358 (2014)
Cuollo, M., Ortore, E., Bunkheila, F., Ulivieri, C.: Interlink and coverage analysis for small satellite constellations. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., G J. Aerosp. Eng. 227, 1201–1212 (2013)
Curtis, H.D.: Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students. Butterworth, Stoneham (2013)
De Weck, O.L., De Neufville, R., Chaize, M.: Staged deployment of communications satellite constellations in low Earth orbit. J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun. 1, 119–136 (2004)
Del Portillo, I., Cameron, B.G., Crawley, E.F.: A technical comparison of three low Earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband. Acta Astronaut. 159, 123–135 (2019)
Di Carlo, M., Ricciardi, L.A., Vasile, M.: Multi-objective optimisation of constellation deployment using low-thrust propulsion. In: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, p. 5577 (2016)
Fakoor, M., Bakhtiari, M., Soleymani, M.: Optimal design of the satellite constellation arrangement reconfiguration process. Adv. Space Res. 58, 372–386 (2016)
Garcia, I., How, J.P.: Trajectory optimization for satellite reconfiguration maneuvers with position and attitude constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005, pp. 889–894. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)
Ha, S.N.: A nonlinear shooting method for two-point boundary value problems. Comput. Math. Appl. 42, 1411–1420 (2001)
Hajimirsadeghi, H., Lucas, C.: A hybrid IWO/PSO algorithm for fast and global optimization. In: IEEE EUROCON 2009, pp. 1964–1971. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)
He, X., Li, H., Yang, L., Zhao, J.: Reconfigurable satellite constellation design for disaster monitoring using physical programming. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2020 (2020)
Lee, Y., Choi, J.P.: Connectivity analysis of mega-constellation satellite networks with optical intersatellite links. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 57, 4213–4226 (2021)
Liu, S., Meng, T., Jin, Z., Song, R.: Optimal deployment of heterogeneous microsatellite constellation based on Kuhn-Munkres and simulated annealing algorithms. J. Aerosp. Eng. 35, 4022090 (2022)
Mahdisoozani, H., Bakhtiari, M., Daneshjoo, K.: Developing novel multi-plane satellite constellation deployment methods using the concept of nodal precession. Adv. Space Res. (2021)
McGrath, C.N., Macdonald, M.: General perturbation method for satellite constellation reconfiguration using low-thrust maneuvers. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 42, 1676–1692 (2019)
McLemore, B., Psiaki, M.: Navigation using Doppler shift from LEO constellations and INS data. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. (2022)
Morgan, S.J., McGrath, C., De Weck, O.L.: Mobile target tracking using a reconfigurable low Earth orbit constellation. In: ASCEND 2020, p. 4247 (2020)
Mushet, G., Mingotti, G., Colombo, C., McInnes, C.: Self-organising satellite constellation in geostationary Earth orbit. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 51, 910–923 (2015)
Ortore, E., Ulivieri, C., Bunkheila, F.: Satellite constellations in inclined multi-stationary orbits. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., G J. Aerosp. Eng. 225, 1050–1060 (2011)
Pachler, N., del Portillo, I., Crawley, E.F., Cameron, B.G.: An updated comparison of four low Earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), pp. 1–7. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2021)
Shtark, T., Gurfil, P.: Position and velocity estimation with a low Earth orbit regional navigation satellite constellation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., G J. Aerosp. Eng. 236, 1375–1387 (2022)
Soleymani, M., Fakoor, M., Bakhtiari, M.: Optimal mission planning of the reconfiguration process of satellite constellations through orbital maneuvers: a novel technical framework. Adv. Space Res. 63, 3369–3384 (2019)
Toth, V.T.: Gravitational anomaly detection using a satellite constellation: analysis and simulation. Astrophys. Space Sci. 368, 92 (2023)
Wang, J., Liang, B.: 4-GNSS radio occultation satellite constellation design based on Dual-gate uniformity evaluation index. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., G J. Aerosp. Eng. 231, 3–16 (2017)
Zuo, X., Bai, X., Xu, M., Li, M., Zhou, J., Yu, L., Zhang, J.: Satellite constellation reconfiguration using surrogate-based optimization. J. Aerosp. Eng. 35, 4022043 (2022)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Majid Bakhtiari gave the main idea of the article and reviewed the past studies, also validated the results of this article and corrected the English language of the article. Ehsan Abbasali did the coding and simulation of the article and wrote the text of the article
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bakhtiari, M., Abbasali, E. An optimal deployment strategy for multi-plane satellite constellation using a generalized non-planar maneuver. Astrophys Space Sci 369, 26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-024-04288-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-024-04288-5