Abstract
Water surplus and deficits are crucial concerns in water management with climate change and increasing demand. We investigated spatial and temporal variations in the net water flux (precipitation minus evapotranspiration) as an indicator of water availability over the main water basins of the Brazilian Cerrado biome from 2000 to 2019 (20 years). Net water flux has decreased in all basins during the analyzed period. Through several examples, we hypothesize that land use and land cover changes can provide insights into net water flux dynamics. We found a general trend of increasing evapotranspiration (14.91 mm year\(^{-1}\)) together with decreasing precipitation (\(-\)15.41 mm year\(^{-1}\)) over the entire Cerrado. Results indicated that soybeans and sugarcane crops expansion across the Cerrado biome drove an impact on increasing the evapotranspiration in a scenario of decreasing precipitation, resulting in lower net water flux. A decreasing trend of net water flux was significant in the 5-year periods across all Cerrado biome basins. The nexus between net water flux and land use and cover changes is provided by evidence of evapotranspiration increasing by converting pasture and forest into crops (mostly soybeans).
Graphic abstract
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10113-023-02127-x/MediaObjects/10113_2023_2127_Figa_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10113-023-02127-x/MediaObjects/10113_2023_2127_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10113-023-02127-x/MediaObjects/10113_2023_2127_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10113-023-02127-x/MediaObjects/10113_2023_2127_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10113-023-02127-x/MediaObjects/10113_2023_2127_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10113-023-02127-x/MediaObjects/10113_2023_2127_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data and material are available from the corresponding author under reasonable request.
Code Availability
The code is available from the corresponding author under reasonable request.
References
Ajjur SB, Al-Ghamdi SG (2021) Evapotranspiration and water availability response to climate change in the Middle East and North Africa. Clim Change 166(3–4):28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03122-z
ANA (2012) Ottocoded basins (otto levels 1-7) - agência nacional de Águas. https://metadados.snirh.gov.br/geonetwork/srv/api/records/b228d007-6d68-46e5-b30d-a1e191b2b21f, Accessed 21 Apr 2022
ANA (2021) Brazil irrigation atlas. http://atlasirrigacao.ana.gov.br/, Accessed 27 Jan 2022
Anderson RG, Lo MH, Famiglietti JS (2012) Assessing surface water consumption using remotely-sensed groundwater, evapotranspiration, and precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 39(16). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052400
Araujo LM, Teixeira AHdC, Bassoi LH (2020) Evapotranspiration and biomass modelling in the Pontal Sul Irrigation Scheme. Int J Remote Sens 41(6):2326–2338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1688416
Ballarin AS, Sousa Mota Uchôa JG, dos Santos MS, Almagro A, Miranda IP, et al (2023) Brazilian water security threatened by climate change and human behavior. Water Resour Res 59(7):e2023WR034,914. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR034914
Bitencourt MD, Mesquita HN Jr, Kuntschik G, Rocha HR, Furley PA (2007) Cerrado vegetation study using optical and radar remote sensing: two Brazilian case studies. Can J Remote Sens 33(6):468–480. https://doi.org/10.5589/m07-054
Bravo JM, Collischonn W, Paz AR, Allasia D, Domecq F (2014) Impact of projected climate change on hydrologic regime of the upper Paraguay River basin. Clim Change 127(1):27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0816-2
Bustamante MMC, Nardoto GB, Pinto AS, Resende JCF, Takahashi FSC et al (2012) Potential impacts of climate change on biogeochemical functioning of Cerrado ecosystems. Braz J Biol 72:655–671. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842012000400005
Byrne MP, O’Gorman PA (2015) The response of precipitation minus evapotranspiration to climate warming: why the “wet-get-wetter, dry-get-drier’’ scaling does not hold over land. J Clim 28(20):8078–8092. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0369.1
Caballero CB, Ruhoff A, Biggs T (2022) Land use and land cover changes and their impacts on surface-atmosphere interactions in Brazil: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ 808(152):134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152134
Calder IR (1998) Water use by forests, limits and controls. Tree physiology 18(8–9):625–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.8-9.625
Chan KS, Cryer JD (2008) Time series analysis with applications in R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75959-3
Chen C, Park T, Wang X, Piao S, Xu B et al (2019) China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nature sustainability 2(2):122–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0220-7
Cheng L, Yang M, Wang X, Wan G (2020) Spatial and temporal variations of terrestrial evapotranspiration in the upper Taohe River Basin from 2001 to 2018 based on MOD16 ET data. Adv Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3721414
Cleugh HA, Leuning R, Mu Q, Running SW (2007) Regional evaporation estimates from flux tower and MODIS satellite data. Remote Sens Environ 106(3):285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.007
Coe MT, Latrubesse E, Ferreira M, Amsler M (2011) The effects of deforestation and climate variability on the streamflow of the Araguaia River, Brazil. Biogeochemistry 105(1):119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9582-2
Dinpashoh Y, Jhajharia D, Fakheri-Fard A, Singh VP, Kahya E (2011) Trends in reference crop evapotranspiration over Iran. J Hydrol 399(3–4):422–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.021
Duan SB, Li ZL, Li H, Göttsche FM, Wu H et al (2019) Validation of collection 6 MODIS land surface temperature product using in situ measurements. Remote Sens Environ 225:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.020
Eiten G (1972) The Cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Bot Rev 38(2):201–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859158
Farinosi F, Arias ME, Lee E, Longo M, Pereira FF et al (2019) Future climate and land use change impacts on River flows in the Tapajós basin in the Brazilian Amazon. Earth’s Future 7(8):993–1017. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001198
Ferreira FLV, Rodrigues LN, Althoff D, Amorim RSS (2023) Spatial-temporal variability of climatic water balance in the Brazilian Savannah Region River Basins. Water 15(10):1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15101820
Furley PA (1999) The nature and diversity of neotropical savanna vegetation with particular reference to the Brazilian Cerrados. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8(3–4):223–241. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.1999.00142.x
Grosberg RK, Vermeij GJ, Wainwright PC (2012) Biodiversity in water and on land. Curr Biol 22(21):R900–R903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.050
Guidolini J, Ometto J, Nery T, Arcoverde G, Giarolla A (2020) Hydro-geomorphological characterization of the Rio Grande basin, Brazil, using geospatial approach. Sustain Water Resour Manag 6(5):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00454-z
Hijmans RJ, Bivand R, Pebesma E, Sumner MD (2023) Terra: spatial data analysis. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra
Hofmann GS, Cardoso MF, Alves RJ, Weber EJ, Barbosa AA et al (2021) The Brazilian Cerrado is becoming hotter and drier. Glob Change Biol 27(17):4060–4073. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15712
Hyndman R, Athanasopoulos G, Bergmeir C, Caceres G, Chhay L et al (2023) Forecast: forecasting functions for time series and linear models. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=forecast
INPE (2022) Projeto (prodes) Cerrado - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. http://www.obt.inpe.br/Cerrado/, Accessed 21 Jan 2022
Jaiswal R, Lohani A, Tiwari H (2015) Statistical analysis for change detection and trend assessment in climatological parameters. Environ Process 2(4):729–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-015-0105-3
Júnior J, Tomasella J, Rodriguez D (2015) Impacts of future climatic and land cover changes on the hydrological regime of the Madeira River basin. Clim Change 129(1):117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1338-x
Kabite G, Gessesse B (2018) Hydro-geomorphological characterization of Dhidhessa River basin, Ethiopia. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 6(2):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.02.003
Kendall M (1975) Rank correlation methods. San Francisco, CA 8:875
Lahsen M, Bustamante MMC, Dalla-Nora EL (2016) Undervaluing and overexploiting the Brazilian Cerrado at our peril. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 58(6):4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1229537
Lehmann F, Vishwakarma BD, Bamber J (2022) How well are we able to close the water budget at the global scale? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 26(1):35–54. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-35-2022
Lima JE, Silva CL, Oliveira CAS (2001) Comparação da evapotranspiração real simulada e observada em uma bacia hidrográfica em condições naturais de Cerrado. Rev Bras Eng Agr Amb 5:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662001000100007
Lucas M, Oliveira PT, Melo DC, Wendland E (2015) Evaluation of remotely sensed data for estimating recharge to an outcrop zone of the Guarani Aquifer System (South America). Hydrogeol J 23(5):961–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1246-1
Maeda EE, Abera TA, Siljander M, Aragão LE, Moura YM et al (2021) Large-scale commodity agriculture exacerbates the climatic impacts of Amazonian deforestation. PNAS 118(7). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22840-7
Magnoni PHJ, Silva CdOF, Manzione RL (2020) Groundwater recharge and water table levels modelling using remotely sensed data and cloud-computing. Sustain Water Resour Manag 6(6):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00469-6
Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 245–259
Manzione RL (2023) Detection of spatial and temporal precipitation patterns using remotely sensed data in the Paranapanema River Basin, Brazil from 2000 to 2021. Discover Water 3(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-023-00035-z
Manzione RL, Silva COF (2022) Expansion of biofuel cash-crops and its geoethical implications in the scope of groundwater governance. Sustain Water Resour Manag 8(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00627-y
Manzione RL, Silva CdOF, Castrignano A (2021) A combined geostatistical approach of data fusion and stochastic simulation for probabilistic assessment of shallow water table depth risk. Sci Tot Env 765(142):743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142743
MapBiomas (2021) Plataforma MapBiomas Brasil. https://plataforma.brasil.mapbiomas.org/, Accessed 27 Jan 2022
Marengo JA, Jimenez JC, Espinoza JC, Cunha AP, Aragão LE (2022) Increased climate pressure on the agricultural frontier in the eastern Amazonia-Cerrado transition zone. Sci Rep 12(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04241-4
Moreira AA, Adamatti DS, Ruhoff AL (2018) Evaluation of remotely sensed evapotranspiration products MOD16 and GLEAM in eddy covariance flux sites from LBA project. Ciência e Natura 40(Special Editon):112–118. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X30714
Mu Q, Zhao M, Running SW (2011) Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sens Environ 115(8):1781–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019
Muniz RA, Sousa EF, Mendonça JC, Esteves BdS, Lousada LL (2014) Balanço de energia e evapotranspiração do capim Mombaça sob sistema de pastejo rotacionado. Rev Bras Meteo 29:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-77862014000100005
Oliveira PTS, Nearing MA, Moran MS, Goodrich DC, Wendland E et al (2014) Trends in water balance components across the Brazilian Cerrado. Water Resour Res 50(9):7100–7114. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015202
PAM/IBGE (2022) Produção agrícola municipal - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/pam/tabelas/, Accessed 21 Jan 2022
Penatti NC, Almeida TIR, Ferreira LG, Arantes AE, Coe MT (2015) Satellite-based hydrological dynamics of the world’s largest continuous wetland. Remote Sens Environ 170:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.08.031
Pettitt A (1979) A non-parametric approach t stat. App Stat 28(2):126–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346729
Pfafastetter O (1989) Classificação de bacias hidrográficas - metodologia de codificação. DNOS, Rio de Janeiro
Pohlert T (2023) Trend: non-parametric trend tests and change-point detection. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=trend
Probst WN, Stelzenmüller V, Fock HO (2012) Using cross-correlations to assess the relationship between time-lagged pressure and state indicators: an exemplary analysis of north sea fish population indicators. ICES J Mar Sci 69(4):670–681. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss015
Queiroz TB, Rocha SMG, Fonseca FSA, Martins ER, Alvarenga ICA (2017) Efeitos do déficit hídrico no cultivo de mudas de Eucalipto. Irriga 22(4):659–674. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2017v22n4p659-674
Rocha HR, Freitas HC, Rosolem R, Juárez RI, Tannus RN et al (2002) Measurements of CO2 exchange over a woodland savanna (Cerrado Sensu stricto) in southeast Brazil. Biota Neotropica 2(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032002000100009
Roche JW, Ma Q, Rungee J, Bales RC (2020) Evapotranspiration mapping for forest management in California’s Sierra Nevada. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 3:69. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00069
Ruhoff A, Paz A, Aragao L, Mu Q, Malhi Y et al (2013) Assessment of the MODIS global evapotranspiration algorithm using eddy covariance measurements and hydrological modelling in the Rio Grande basin. Hydrol Sci J 58(8):1658–1676. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.837578
Sano EE, Rodrigues AA, Martins ES, Bettiol GM, Bustamante MMC et al (2019) Cerrado ecoregions: a spatial framework to assess and prioritize Brazilian savanna environmental diversity for conservation. J Environ Manag 232(15):818–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00469-6
Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s Tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63(324):1379–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934
Sheffield J, Ferguson CR, Troy TJ, Wood EF, McCabe MF (2009) Closing the terrestrial water budget from satellite remote sensing. Geophys Res Lett 36(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL037338
Shumway RH, Stoffer DS, Stoffer DS (2000) Time series analysis and its applications, vol 3. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52452-8
Silva COF, Manzione RL, Albuquerque Filho JL (2019a) Combining remotely sensed actual evapotranspiration and GIS analysis for groundwater level modeling. Environ Earth Sci 78:462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8467-x
Silva COF, Manzione RL, Albuquerque Filho JL (2019b) Comparison of SAFER and METRIC-based actual evapotranspiration models in a subtropical area of Brazil. Irriga 1(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2019v1n1p48-55
Silva NdS, Ribeiro CAAS, Barroso WR, Ribeiro PEÁ, Soares VP et al (2008) Sistema de otto-codificação modificado para endereçamento de redes hidrográficas. Arvore 32:891–897. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622008000500014
Siqueira PP, Oliveira PTS, Bressiani D, Neto AAM, Rodrigues DB (2021) Effects of climate and land cover changes on water availability in a Brazilian Cerrado basin. J Hydrol Reg Studies 37(100):931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100931
Song XP, Hansen MC, Potapov P, Adusei B, Pickering J et al (2021) Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation. Nat Sustain 4(9):784–792. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00729-z
Stoffer D (2023) astsa: applied statistical time series analysis. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=astsa
Swenson S, Wahr J (2006) Estimating large-scale precipitation minus evapotranspiration from grace satellite gravity measurements. J Hydromet 7(2):252–270. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM478.1
Teixeira A, Leivas J, Takemura C, Bayma G, Garçon E et al (2023) Remote sensing environmental indicators for monitoring spatial and temporal dynamics of water and vegetation conditions: applications to the Brazilian biomes. Environ Monit Assess 195:944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11560-8
Teixeira AHdC, Takemura CM, Leivas JF, Pacheco EP, Bayma-Silva G et al (2020) Water productivity monitoring by using geotechnological tools in contrasting social and environmental conditions: applications in the São Francisco River basin, Brazil. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 18(100):296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100296
Teixeira AHdC, Leivas JF, Pacheco EP, Garçon EAM, Takemura CM (2021) Biophysical characterization and monitoring large-scale water and vegetation anomalies by remote sensing in the agricultural growing areas of the brazilian semi-arid region. Advances in Remote Sensing for Natural Resource Monitoring 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119616016.ch7
Terrabrasilis (2022) Geographic data platform. http://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br/en/home-page/, Accessed 5 Jan 2022
TRASE (2022) Transparent supply chains for sustainable economies. https://trase.earth/data?lang=en/, Accessed 21 Jan 2022
TRMM (2019) Rainfall estimate L3 3 hour 0.25 degree x 0.25 degree v7. https://doi.org/10.5067/TRMM/TMPA/3H/7
Von Randow RCS, Rodriguez DA, Tomasella J, Aguiar APD, Kruijt B et al (2019) Response of the River discharge in the Tocantins River Basin, Brazil, to environmental changes and the associated effects on the energy potential. Reg Env Change 19(1):193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1396-5
Wang H, Guan H, Gutiérrez-Jurado HA, Simmons CT (2014) Examination of water budget using satellite products over Australia. J Hydrol 511:546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.076
Wendland E, Barreto C, Gomes L (2007) Water balance in the Guarani Aquifer outcrop zone based on hydrogeologic monitoring. J Hydrol 342(3–4):261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.033
te Wierik SA, Cammeraat EL, Gupta J, Artzy-Randrup YA (2021) Reviewing the impact of land use and land-use change on moisture recycling and precipitation patterns. Water Resour Res 57(7):e2020WR029,234. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029234
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conceptualization and investigation. Methodology and validation were performed by COFS and RLM. COFS conducted the modeling research, including coding, data curation, software, and formal analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by COFS and RLM and MMC commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by George Zittis.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Silva, C., Manzione, R.L. & Caldas, M.M. Net water flux and land use shifts across the Brazilian Cerrado between 2000 and 2019. Reg Environ Change 23, 151 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02127-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02127-x