Skip to main content
Log in

The role of emotion recognition in reappraisal affordances

  • Research
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 14 June 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Emotion regulation is essential for psychological well-being. One strategy that is commonly researched is reappraisal. Individual differences regarding the tendency to use reappraisal, as well as its implications for affective experience, were extensively studied. In recent years, interest has emerged in the choice to use reappraisal, based on stimuli properties. Recently, we suggested that reappraisal is related to emotion recognition processes. Emotion recognition (and affective labeling, as an explicit form of emotion recognition) is regarded as a form of emotion regulation, however, the relations between emotion recognition and reappraisal have not been previously investigated. The aim of the current study was to explore the relationship between reappraisal affordances (the opportunities of re-interpretation that are inherent in a stimulus) and emotion recognition.

Method

For this purpose, we used the Categorized Affective Picture Database, a database that provides data regarding the emotional category of each picture, agreement levels for each category, and intensity ratings. Agreement levels were used to assess the certainty regarding the emotion evoked by the pictures.

Results

Findings suggest that reappraisal affordance is predicted by both agreement levels and intensity, in negative pictures alone. In negative pictures, intensity was negatively correlated with the difficulty to reappraise.

Discussion

These findings strengthen the hypothesis regarding the relationship between emotion recognition and reappraisal, and provide evidence for the role of emotion recognition in reappraisal affordances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data regarding this study will be available on request.

Change history

References

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

conceptualization: Natali Moyal, Avishai Henik and Gideon E. Anholt; methodology: Natali Moyal; data analysis and investigation: Natali Moyal and Ilona Glebov-Russinov; supervision: Avishai Henik and Gideon E. Anholt; writing—original draft preparation: Natali Moyal, Ilona Glebov-Russinov; writing—review and editing: Natali Moyal, Ilona Glebov-Russinov, Avishai Henik and Gideon E. Anholt.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natali Moyal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Psychology Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moyal, N., Glebov-Russinov, I., Henik, A. et al. The role of emotion recognition in reappraisal affordances. Psychological Research 88, 1629–1636 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01966-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01966-5

Navigation