Abstract
One-neutron stripping process between \(^{6}\)Li and \(^{209}\)Bi was studied at 28, 30, and 34 MeV using the in-beam \(\gamma \)-ray spectroscopy method. The \(\gamma \)–\(\gamma \) coincident analysis clearly identified two \(\gamma \)-rays feeding the ground and long-lived isomeric states, which were employed to determine the cross section. The one-neutron stripping cross sections were similar to the cross sections of complete fusion in the \(^6\)Li+\(^{209}\)Bi system, but the one-neutron stripping cross sections decreased more gradually at the sub-barrier region. A coupled-reaction-channel calculation was performed to study the detailed reaction mechanism of the one-neutron stripping process in \(^6\)Li. The calculations indicated that the first excited state of \(^5\)Li is critical in the actual one-neutron transfer mechanism, and the valence proton of \(^{209}\textrm{Bi}\) can be excited to the low-lying excited state in (\(^{6}\textrm{Li}\),\(^{5}\textrm{Li}\)) reaction, unlike in the (d,p) reaction.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-024-01462-w/MediaObjects/41365_2024_1462_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-024-01462-w/MediaObjects/41365_2024_1462_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-024-01462-w/MediaObjects/41365_2024_1462_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-024-01462-w/MediaObjects/41365_2024_1462_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-024-01462-w/MediaObjects/41365_2024_1462_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41365-024-01462-w/MediaObjects/41365_2024_1462_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Science Data Bank at https://cstr.cn/31253.11.sciencedb.j00186.00545 and https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.j00186.00545.
References
B.B. Back, H. Esbensen, C.L. Jiang et al., Recent developments in heavy-ion fusion reactions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 317–360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.317
C. Beck, N. Keeley, A. Diaz-Torres, Coupled-channel effects in elastic scattering and near-barrier fusion induced by weakly bound nuclei and exotic halo nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 75, 054605 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.054605
L. Canto, P. Gomes, R. Donangelo et al., Fusion and breakup of weakly bound nuclei. Phys. Rep. 424, 1–111 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.006
L. Canto, P. Gomes, R. Donangelo et al., Recent developments in fusion and direct reactions with weakly bound nuclei. Phys. Rep. 596, 1–86 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.08.001
M. Dasgupta, P.R.S. Gomes, D.J. Hinde et al., Effect of breakup on the fusion of \(^{6}{\rm Li}\), \(^{7}{\rm Li}\), and \(^{9}{\rm Be}\) with heavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 70, 024606 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.024606
N. Keeley, N. Alamanos, K. Kemper et al., Elastic scattering and reactions of light exotic beams. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 396–447 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2009.05.003
N. Keeley, R. Raabe, N. Alamanos et al., Fusion and direct reactions of halo nuclei at energies around the coulomb barrier. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 579–630 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2007.02.002
K. Hagino, N. Takigawa, Subbarrier fusion reactions and many-particle quantum tunneling. Prog. Theor. Phys. 128, 1061–1106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.128.1061
J.F. Liang, C. Signorini, Fusion induced by radioactive ion beams. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 14, 1121–1150 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021830130500382X
C.S. Palshetkar, S. Santra, A. Chatterjee et al., Fusion of the weakly bound projectile \(^{9}{\rm Be}\) with \(^{89}{\rm Y}\). Phys. Rev. C 82, 044608 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.044608
S. Santra, V. Parkar, K. Ramachandran et al., Resonant breakup of 6Li by 209 Bi. Phys. Lett. B 677, 139–144 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.05.016
A. Shrivastava, A. Navin, A. Lemasson et al., Exploring fusion at extreme sub-barrier energies with weakly bound nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 232702 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.232702
G.L. Zhang, C.L. Zhang, H.Q. Zhang et al., Quasi-elastic scattering of the proton drip line nucleus 17f on 12c at 60 mev. Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 65 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12065-x
S.P. Hu, G.L. Zhang, J.C. Yang et al., One-neutron stripping processes to excited states of the \(^{6}{\rm Li}+^{96}{\rm Zr}\) reaction at near-barrier energies. Phys. Rev. C 93, 014621 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.014621
G.L. Zhang, G.X. Zhang, S.P. Hu et al., One-neutron stripping processes to excited states of \(^{90}{\rm Y}^{*}\) in the \(^{89}{\rm Y}(^{6}{\rm Li},^{5}{\rm Li})^{90}{\rm Y}^{*}\) reaction. Phys. Rev. C 97, 014611 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.014611
Y.D. Fang, P.R.S. Gomes, J. Lubian et al., One-neutron stripping from \(^{9}\text{ Be }\) to \(^{169}\text{ Tm },^{181}\text{ Ta }\), and \(^{187}\text{ Re }\) at near-barrier energies. Phys. Rev. C 93, 034615 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034615
A. Shrivastava, A. Navin, A. Lemasson et al., Exploring fusion at extreme sub-barrier energies with weakly bound nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 232702 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.232702
A. Shrivastava, A. Navin, A. Diaz-Torres et al., Role of the cluster structure of 7Li in the dynamics of fragment capture. Phys. Lett. B 718, 931–936 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.064
C.S. Palshetkar, S. Thakur, V. Nanal et al., Fusion and quasi-elastic scattering in the \(^{6,7}{\rm Li}\)+\(^{197}{\rm Au}\) systems. Phys. Rev. C 89, 024607 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.024607
A. Di Pietro, P. Figuera, E. Strano et al., Heavy residue excitation functions for the collisions \({}^{6,7}\)li+\({}^{64}\)zn near the coulomb barrier. Phys. Rev. C 87, 064614 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.064614
Y.D. Fang, P.R.S. Gomes, J. Lubian et al., Complete and incomplete fusion of \(^{9}{\rm Be}\)\(+\)\(^{169}{\rm Tm},^{187}{\rm Re}\) at near-barrier energies. Phys. Rev. C 91, 014608 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.014608
M. Fisichella, A.C. Shotter, P. Figuera et al., Breakup and \(n\)-transfer effects on the fusion reactions \(^{6,7}{\rm Li}+^{120,119}{\rm Sn}\) around the coulomb barrier. Phys. Rev. C 95, 034617 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034617
M.K. Pradhan, A. Mukherjee, S. Roy et al., Importance of the \(1n\)-stripping process in the \({}^{6}\)Li + \({}^{159}\)Tb reaction. Phys. Rev. C 88, 064603 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064603
S. Santra, S. Kailas, V.V. Parkar et al., Disentangling reaction mechanisms for \(\alpha \) production in the \({}^{6}\)Li + \({}^{209}\)Bi reaction. Phys. Rev. C 85, 014612 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.014612
P.R.S. Gomes, A.M.M. Maciel, R.M. Anjos et al., Transfer reactions as a doorway to fusion. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 23, 1315 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/23/10/020
N. Timofeyuk, R. Johnson, Theory of deuteron stripping and pick-up reactions for nuclear structure studies. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 111, 103738 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2019.103738
S. Butler, On angular distributions from (d, p) and (d, n) nuclear reactions. Phys. Rev. 80, 1095–1096 (1950). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.80.1095.2
K. Wimmer, Nucleon transfer reactions with radioactive beams. J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 45, 033002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aaa2bf
C. Cline, W. Alford, H. Gove et al., Multiplet structure of 210bi from the 209bi(d, p) and 209bi(α, 3he) reactions. Nucl. Phys. A 186, 273–296 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(72)90046-2
J.J. Kolata, W.W. Daehnick, Shell-model structure of \(^{210}{\rm Bi}\): \(^{209}{\rm Bi}(d, p)\) at 17 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 5, 568–578 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.5.568
C.R. Bingham, D.L. Hillis, Neutron shell structure in \(^{125}{\rm Sn}\) by (\(d, p\)) and (\(\alpha,^{3}{\rm He}\)) reactions. Phys. Rev. C 8, 729–736 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.8.729
M.J. Bechara, O. Dietzsch, States in \(^{121}{\rm Sn}\) from the \(^{120}{\rm Sn}(d, p)^{121}{\rm Sn}\) reaction at 17 mev. Phys. Rev. C 12, 90–101 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.12.90
D. Burke, G. Kajrys, Single-nucleon-transfer tests of the u(612) supersymmetry in platinum isotopes. Nucl. Phys. A 517, 1–26 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(90)90258-N
C.R. Bingham, G.T. Fabian, Neutron shell structure in \(^{93}{\rm Zr}\), \(^{95}{\rm Zr}\), and \(^{97}{\rm Zr}\) by (\(d, p\)) and (\(\alpha \), \(^{3}{\rm He}\)) reactions. Phys. Rev. C 7, 1509–1518 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.7.1509
V.V. Parkar, A.P.M. Parmar et al., Investigating neutron transfer in the \(^{6}{\rm Li}+^{124}{\rm Sn}\) system. Phys. Rev. C 107, 024602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.024602
J.R. Erskine, W.W. Buechner, H.A. Enge, \(^{209}{\rm Bi}\) (d, p) \(^{210}{\rm Bi}\) reaction at low bombarding energies and with high resolution. Phys. Rev 128, 720 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.128.720
C. Ellegaard, P.D. Barnes, R. Eisenstein et al., Decay modes and lifetimes of the levels in the \(\pi h 92.\nu \)g92 multiplet in \(^{210}{\rm Bi}\). Phys. Lett. B 35, 145–147 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(71)90241-3
H.T. Motz, E.T. Jurney, E.B. Shera et al., Low-lying configurations in \(^{210}{\rm Bi}\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 854 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.854
C.V.K. Baba, T. Faestermann, D.B. Fossan et al., Magnetic moments of the 7- and 5-(\(\pi \) h 9/2, \(\nu \) g 9/2) states in \(^{210}{\rm Bi}\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 496 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.496
D. Proetel, F. Riess, E. Grosse et al., Gamma decay of excited states in \(^{210}{\rm Bi}\) and an interpretation with the shell model. Phys. Rev. C 7, 2137 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.7.2137
D.J. Donahue, O. Häusser, R.L. Hershberger et al., Transition rates between two-body states in \(^{206}{\rm Tl}\), \(^{208}{\rm Bi}\), and \(^{210}{\rm Bi}\). Phys. Rev. C 12, 1547 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.12.1547
T.R. Canada, R.A. Eisenstein, C. Ellegaard et al., The \(\gamma \)-decay of two-particle states in 210bi. Nucl. Phys. A 205, 145–167 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(73)90126-7
J. Gutleber, S. Murray, L. Orsini, Towards a homogeneous architecture for high-energy physics data acquisition systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 155–163 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00161-9
A. Goasduff, D. Mengoni, F. Recchia et al., The Galileo-ray array at the Legnaro national laboratories. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 1015, 165753 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2021.165753
D. Testov, D. Mengoni, A. Goasduff et al., The 4 \(\pi \) highly-efficient light-charged-particle detector euclides, installed at the Galileo array for in-beam \(\gamma \)-ray spectroscopy. Eur. Phys. J. A. 55, 47 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12714-6
A. Gavron, Statistical model calculations in heavy ion reactions. Phys. Rev. C 21, 230–236 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.21.230
R.K. Sheline, R.L. Ponting, A.K. Jain et al., Spectroscopy of the high-lying configurations in \(^{210}\)Bi. Czech. J. Phys. B39, 22 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01597435
I.J. Thompson, Coupled reaction channels calculations in nuclear physics. Comput. Phys. Rep. 7, 167–212 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7977(88)90005-6
S. Santra, S. Kailas, K. Ramachandran et al., Reaction mechanisms involving weakly bound \(^{6}{\rm Li}\) and \(^{209}{\rm Bi}\) at energies near the coulomb barrier. Phys. Rev. C 83, 034616 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034616
L.C. Chamon, D. Pereira, M.S. Hussein et al., Nonlocal description of the nucleus-nucleus interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5218–5221 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5218
J. Lubian, J.L. Ferreira, J. Rangel et al., Fusion processes in collisions of \(^6\)Li beams on heavy targets. Phys. Rev. C li beams on heavy targets. Phys. Rev. C 105, 054601 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054601
L.F. Canto, J. Lubian, P.R.S. Gomes et al., Continuum-continuum coupling and polarization potentials for weakly bound systems. Phys. Rev. C 80, 047601 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.047601
K.H. Maier, T. Nail, R.K. Sheline et al., Structure of \(^{209}{\rm Bi}\) deduced from the \(^{208}{\rm Pb}(t, 2n\gamma )\) reaction. Phys. Rev. C 27, 1431–1453 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.27.1431
NuShellX for Windows and Linux, http://www.garsington.eclipse.co.uk/ (2024)
E.K. Warburton, B.A. Brown, Appraisal of the Kuo-Herling shell-model interaction and application to A=210-212 nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 43, 602–617 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.43.602
J. McGrory, T. Kuo, Shell model calculations of two to four identical—“particle” systems near Pb. Nucl. Phys. A 247, 283–316 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(75)90637-5
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the INFN-LNL staff for providing a stable 6-Li beam throughout the experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Gao-Long Zhang, Zhen-Wei Jiao, Guang-Xin Zhang and Shi-Peng Hu. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Zhen-Wei Jiao, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. U2167204, 11975040, and U1832130), the Brazilian funding agencies CAPES, CNPq, FAPERJ, and the INCT-FNA (Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia-Física Nuclear e Aplicações), research project 464898/2014-5. S. P. Hu was supported by Guang dong Key Research And Development Program (No. 2020B040420005), Guang dong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2021B1515120027), Ling Chuang Research Project of China National Nuclear Corporation (No. 20221024000072F6-0002-7), and Nuclear Energy Development and Research Project (No. HNKF202224(28)). The work was also supported by the ‘111’ center (B20065). M. Siciliano was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under contract number DE-AC02- 06CH1135.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, GL., Jiao, ZW., Zhang, GX. et al. One-neutron stripping process in the 209Bi(6Li, 5Li)210Bi* reaction reaction. NUCL SCI TECH 35, 104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01462-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01462-w