Skip to main content
Log in

“Speaking More than Words”: Classifying Men with Social Anxiety Disorder via Vocal Acoustic Analyses of Diagnostic Interviews

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between vocal pitch and social anxiety has been examined with encouraging results across a growing number of studies, highlighting increased fundamental frequency (F0) as a potential disorder-specific physiological marker of social anxiety. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between mean F0 emitted during diagnostic interviews and social anxiety disorder (SAD) symptoms. Patients who qualified for a diagnosis of SAD (n = 26) and a subsample of demographically-matched healthy controls (HCs; n = 12) were administered clinical diagnostic interviews. We examined mean F0 emitted during select segments of the diagnostic interviews utilizing specialized vocal analysis equipment. Men (but not women) who qualified for a diagnosis of SAD emitted greater overall mean F0 in comparison to HCs throughout the course of the diagnostic interviews, and mean F0 emitted during the introductory segment of the diagnostic interviews was positively related to SAD symptoms for men (but not women). Furthermore, a previously-established threshold of mean F0 which demonstrated excellent differentiation between men with SAD and controls was successfully replicated in the present design, with regard to F0 emitted during the introductory segment of the interviews. These results provide strong additional support for increased F0 as a physiological indicator and behavioral marker of SAD in samples of men. Implications for the assessment and treatment of SAD are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It bears noting that it was not statistically reasonable to examine whether the patient and control samples were demographically-equivalent with regard to racial/ethnic minority status, given the small sample size of ethnic/racial minorities (i.e., non-Caucasians represented only 7.9 % of the overall sample).

  2. For the sake of comprehensiveness, it is worth noting that the diagnostic group (i.e., SAD patients versus healthy controls) by interview timepoint multivariate interaction remained significant when diagnostic comorbidity status was not included as a covariate, F = 6.85, p = .02; however, the follow-up between-subjects comparison was no longer significant upon removing diagnostic comorbidity status as a covariate, p = .88, Nevertheless, inclusion of diagnostic comorbidity status as a covariate was statistically warranted (see “Preliminary Analyses” section and Fig. 2).

  3. In response to a suggestion from an anonymous reviewer, we added age as a covariate and re-ran our analyses, and our results were substantively identical. To illustrate, the diagnostic group (i.e., SAD patients versus healthy controls) by interview timepoint multivariate interaction remained significant, F = 6.79, p = .033, and this was a large effect, partial η2 = .80. A follow-up between-subjects comparison revealed that the SAD patients emitted significantly higher mean F0 throughout the diagnostic interviews (M = 131.87, SE = 2.12) in comparison to the healthy controls (M = 121.32, SE = 2.94), F = 7.35, p = .03, and this remained a large effect, partial η2 = .51. However, age was not a significant predictor of mean F0, F = 1.64, p = .29, and thus, we have retained focus on our original results. It bears noting that racial/ethnic minority status was deemed inappropriate to include as a covariate in our analyses given the small sample size of ethnic/racial minorities (i.e., non-Caucasians represented only 7.9 % of the overall sample [men and women]; and only 7.7 % of the men in particular).

  4. In response to a suggestion from an anonymous reviewer (see also 3), we also computed the partial correlation between LSAS total scores and mean F0 during the introductory segment of the diagnostic interview upon controlling for age, and this effect remained robust, r = .62, p = .04.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory Manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, A. (2007). Speech and Voice Science. San Diego: Plural Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuke, C. J., Fischer, R., & McDowall, J. (2003). Anxiety and depression: why and how to measure their separate effects. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 831–848. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(03)00074-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.

  • Boone, D. R., McFarlane, S. C., Von Berg, S., & Zraick, R. (2010). The voice and voice therapy (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A., DiNardo, P. A., Lehman, C. L., & Campbell, L. A. (2001). Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: Implications for the classification of emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 49–58. doi:10.1037//0021-843X.110.1.49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collias, N. E. (1960). An ecological and functional classification of animal sounds. In W. E. Lanyon & W. N. Tavolga (Eds.), Animal Sounds and Communication (pp. 368–391). Washington DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Computerized Speech Lab, Model 4500 (Version 3.2). [Software]. (2008). Lincoln Park, NJ: KayPentax.

  • De Los Reyes, A., & Aldao, A. (2015). Introduction to the special section. Toward implementing physiological measures in clinical child and adolescent assessments. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.891227.

  • DiNardo, P. A., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1994). Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV-Lifetime Version (ADIS-IV-L). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galili, L., Amir, O., & Gilboa-Schechtman, E. (2013). Acoustic properties of dominance and request utterances in social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32, 651–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2001). Evolution and social anxiety: the role of attraction, social competition, and social hierarchies. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24, 723–751. doi:10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70260-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, P. (2014). Evolutionary models: Practical and conceptual utility for the treatment and study of social anxiety disorder. In J. W. Weeks (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of social anxiety disorder. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Galili, L., & Amir, O. (2014). Being “in” or “out” of the game: Subjective and acoustic reactions to exclusion and popularity in social anxiety. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimberg, R. G., Mueller, G. P., Holt, C. S., Hope, D. A., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1992). Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: the social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale. Behavior Therapy, 23, 53–73. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80308-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimberg, R. G., Horner, K. J., Juster, H. R., Safren, S. A., Brown, E. J., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Psychological Medicine, 29, 199–212. doi:10.1017/S0033291798007879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, T., & Scherer, K.R. (1999). The effects of emotions on voice quality. In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A. C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIVth International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 2029–2032). San Francisco, CA.

  • Kaminer, D., & Stein, D.J. (2005). An evolutionary perspective on social anxiety disorder. CNS Forum. Retrieved from http://www.cnsforum.com/clinicalresources/articles/annualreviews/sad_evolution/

  • Kapur, S., Phillips, A. G., & Insel, T. R. (2012). Why has it taken so long for biological psychiatry to develop clinical tests and what to do about it? Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 1174–1179. doi:10.1038/mp.2012.105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katzelnick, D. J., Kobak, K. A., DeLeire, T., Henk, H. J., Greist, J. H., Davidson, J. R. T., Greist, J. H., & Helstad, C. P. (2001). Impact of generalized social anxiety disorder in managed care. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1999–2007. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp. 158.12.1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Stang, P., Wittchen, H.-U., Stein, M., & Walters, E. E. (1999). Lifetime comorbidities between social phobia and mood disorders in the U.S. National Comorbidity Survey. Psychological Medicine, 29, 555–567. doi:10.1017/S0033291799008375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P. D., Demler, O., Olga, J. R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 593–602. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laukka, P., Linnman, C., Åhs, F., Pissiota, A., Örjan, F., & Furmark, T. (2008). In a nervous voice: acoustic analysis and perception of anxiety in social phobics’ speech. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 32, 195–214. doi:10.1007/s10919-008-0055-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P., & Blumstein, S. E. (1988). Speech physiology, speech perception, and acoustic phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Schmidt, N. B., & Eckel, L. A. (2008). Submitting to defeat: social anxiety, dominance threat, and decrements in testosterone. Psychological Science, 19, 764–768. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02154.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, D. W., & Quentin, L. L. (2014). Clinical interviews: Empirical overview and procedural recommendations. In J. W. Weeks (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of social anxiety disorder. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, D. S., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Schneier, F. R., Davies, S. O., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2002). Screening for social anxiety disorder in the clinical setting: using the Liebowitz social anxiety scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16, 661–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, E. S. (1977). On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. American Naturalist, 111, 855–869. doi:10.1086/283219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehlberg, K. A., Revelle, W., & Mineka, S. (2012). Time-course of attention to negative stimuli: negative affectivity, anxiety, or dysphoria? Emotion, 12, 943–959. doi:10.1037/a0027227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safren, S. A., Heimberg, R. G., Brown, E. J., & Holle, C. (1997). Quality of life in social phobia. Depression and Anxiety, 4, 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sataloff, R. (1991). Endocrine dysfunction. In R. Sataloff (Ed.), Professional voice: The science and art of clinical care. New York: Raven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, F. R., Heckelman, L. R., Garfinkel, R., Campeas, R., Fallon, B. A., Gitow, A., & Leibowitz, M. R. (1994). Functional impairment in social phobia. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55, 322–331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. B., McQuaid, J. R., Laffaye, C., & McCahill, M. E. (1999). Social phobia in the primary care medical setting. Journal of Family Practice, 48, 514–519.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szafranski, D. D., Talkovsky, A. M., Farris, S. G., & Norton, P. J. (2014). Comorbidity: Social anxiety disorder and psychiatric comorbidity are not shy to co-occur. In J. W. Weeks (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of social anxiety disorder. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Zvolensky, M. J., Cox, B. J., Deacon, B., Heimberg, R. G., Ledley, D. R. ... & Cardenas, S. J. (2007). Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: development and initial validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. Psychological Assessment, 19, 176–188. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.176.

  • Thomas, S. A., Aldao, A., & De Los Reyes, A. (2012). Implementing clinically feasible psychophysiological measures in evidence-based assessments of adolescent social anxiety. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43, 510–519. doi:10.1037/a0029183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. W., Heimberg, R. G., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2008). The fear of positive evaluation scale: assessing a proposed cognitive component of social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 44–55. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. W., Rodebaugh, T. L., Heimberg, R. G., Norton, P. J., & Jakatdar, T. A. (2009). “To avoid evaluation, withdraw”: fears of evaluation and depressive cognitions lead to social anxiety and submissive withdrawal. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 375–389. doi:10.1007/s10608-008-9203-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. W., Jakatdar, T. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (2010). Comparing and contrasting fears of positive and negative evaluation as facets of social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 68–94. doi:10.1521/jscp.2010.29.1.68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. W., Heimberg, R. G., & Heuer, R. (2011). Exploring the role of behavioral submissiveness in social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 217–249. doi:10.1521/jscp.2011.30.3.217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. W., Lee, C.-Y., Reilly, A. R., Howell, A. N., France, C., Kowalsky, J. M., & Bush, A. (2012). “The sound of fear”: assessing vocal fundamental frequency as a physiological indicator of social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 811–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. W., Howell, A. N., & Goldin, P. R. (2013). Gaze avoidance in social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 30, 749–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P., Ludgate, J., Hackmann, A., & Gelder, M. (1995). Social phobia: the role of in-situation safety behaviors in maintaining anxiety and negative beliefs. Behavior Therapy, 26, 153–161. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80088-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, A., & Fucci, D. (2000). Effects of race and gender on acoustic features of voice analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 951–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

Justin W. Weeks, Akanksha Srivastav, Ashley N. Howell and Andrew R. Menatti declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin W. Weeks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weeks, J.W., Srivastav, A., Howell, A.N. et al. “Speaking More than Words”: Classifying Men with Social Anxiety Disorder via Vocal Acoustic Analyses of Diagnostic Interviews. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 38, 30–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9495-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9495-9

Keywords

Navigation